Box and Draper · 2007
Response Surfaces, Mixtures, and Ridge Analyses
- Matches
- Very close
- Close
- Differs
Factorial gives the book's answers, with a few differences. Where they differ, this page says why: some are misprints in the book, and for some the reason is not known yet.
Examples
Each example, and how closely Factorial gives its answers.
Pages 1 to 99
- Two nitrogen fertilizers at three levels in all nine combinations: balanced in the amounts, very unbalanced in their total and ratioDesign · pp. 4-6Matches
- A 16-run two-level fractional factorial screening eight variables, of which four proved influentialDesign · p. 11Matches
- Number of coefficients in polynomials of degree 1 to 4 in 2 to 5 inputsDesign · p. 18Matches
- Four second-order polynomials in two variables: simple maximum, stationary ridge, rising ridge and saddleDesign · p. 20Matches
- Worsted yarn: cycles to failure for specimen length, load-cycle amplitude and load in a 2^3, fitted as a plane in log cyclesExample · pp. 24-27Misprint found
- Electrical conductivity of cotton fibre against humidity: a straight line fitted by least squaresExample · pp. 31, 33-37Matches
- Two catalysts at proportional levels, z2 = 2z1: a design whose Z'Z is singularDesign · pp. 35-36Matches
- Cycles to failure of worsted yarn, a portion of Barella and Sust's data: a first-order model in three coded factorsExample · pp. 37-39Matches
- Yield of a dyestuff against reaction temperature: a quadratic, and the bias of a straight line fitted in its placeExample · pp. 39-40, 57-59Misprint found
- Three observations y = (4, 1, 1)': the geometry of least squares, its analysis of variance, and a second regressorExample · pp. 40-53Matches
- Aliases of a first-degree fit to the 2^(5-2) fraction with I = 124 = 135 when a second-degree model is neededDesign · pp. 59-60Matches
- Design A, the 2^2 factorial: an orthogonal design for a first-order model and its 0.95 confidence regionsDesign · pp. 64-67Matches
- Design B: a nonorthogonal four-run design for a first-order model and its 0.95 confidence regionsDesign · pp. 66-67Misprint found
- A straight line fitted by iteratively reweighted least squares for t-distributed errors, with and without an outlierExample · pp. 72-77Matches
- Retention time of semiconductor memory devices against supply voltage (Exercises 3.1 and 3.2)Exercise · pp. 89-90, 629-630Very close
- Five observations with z = 1: estimate θ and test θ = 8 (Exercise 3.3)Exercise · pp. 90, 630Matches
- Cold-start ignition time against two gasoline additives (Exercise 3.4, Table E3.4)Exercise · pp. 90, 631Misprint found
- Inactivation of adrenaline by liver in vitro: concentration against time in the lower tissues (Exercise 3.5, Table E3.5)Exercise · pp. 90-91, 631-632Very close
- Impurity at three temperatures, two pressures and two catalysts, a 3 x 2 x 2 factorial read as a cubeExample · pp. 92-93Matches
- Textile specimens: cycles to failure against length, amplitude of load cycle and load, a 2^3 analysed in log10Example · pp. 94-99, 111-113Matches
Pages 100 to 199
- Dyestuff manufacture: strength, hue and brightness against six process variables, a 2^6 factorialExample · pp. 100-111, 118-119Differs
- Dyestuff manufacture: the 64 observations grouped in sets of eight by polysulfide index, time and temperatureExample · pp. 104-107Matches
- Twenty observations drawn from a normal distribution, plotted on normal probability paperExample · pp. 113-115Matches
- Detecting an aberrant observation in an unreplicated 2^4 from the normal plot and signs of its effectsExample · pp. 115-118Matches
- Fifteen contrasts of a 2^4 to judge on a normal plot (Exercise 4.2)Exercise · pp. 119, 632Matches
- Fifteen contrasts of a 2^4 to interpret with a normal plot (Exercise 4.3)Exercise · pp. 120, 632Matches
- A 2^3 run in standard order while a disregarded fourth variable drifts: bias of a first-order fit (Exercise 4.5)Exercise · pp. 120, 633Matches
- A 2^3 to analyse by Yates's algorithm (Exercise 4.6)Exercise · pp. 120-121, 633Matches
- Martensite start temperature against carbon, manganese and nickel, a 2^3 (Exercise 4.8)Exercise · pp. 121, 633Matches
- Rate of penetration of a drill against speed, thrust and drilling fluid flow rate (Exercises 4.9 and 4.12)Exercise · pp. 122-123, 633-635Very close
- Yield of a chemical process against catalyst, NaOH, agitation and temperature, a 2^4 (Exercises 4.10 and 4.13)Exercise · pp. 122-124, 634-635Very close
- Tear resistance of paper bags against type of paper, humidity and direction of tear, a 2^3 replicated three times (Exercises 4.11 and 4.14)Exercise · pp. 123-124, 634-635Matches
- A 2^3 with four centre points: a first-order fit, lack of fit and orthogonal contrasts (Exercise 4.15)Exercise · pp. 124, 636-637Misprint found
- Four responses of a 2^4 with six centre points (Chang, Kononenko and Franklin 1960; Exercise 4.16)Exercise · pp. 124-126, 636-638Very close
- Time to discharge of AA batteries against battery type, connector and temperature, a 2^3 (Exercise 4.19)Exercise · pp. 127-128, 638Matches
- A measure of tire performance against four variables, a 2^4 with four centre points (Exercise 4.20)Exercise · pp. 128, 638-639Very close
- The 2^6 factorial in two blocks of 32 runs, the blocks confounded with the 123456 interaction (Table 5.1)Design · pp. 129-130Matches
- The 2^6 factorial in four blocks of 16 and in eight blocks of 8: block generators and the interactions they confound (Section 5.1)Design · pp. 130-133Matches
- Useful blocking arrangements for 2^k factorial designs, k = 3 to 7, with block generators and the interactions confounded (Table 5.2)Design · p. 133Matches
- The half fraction I = 123456 of the 2^6 (block II of Table 5.1): columns of signs, aliases and resolution VI (Table 5.3)Design · pp. 134-138Matches
- Quarter fractions of the 2^6: the block (B1, B2) = (+, +) of B1 = 1234, B2 = 3456, its aliases and resolution IV, and the block (-, +)Design · pp. 137-138Matches
- A saturated resolution III 2^(7-4) design from the 2^3 (Table 5.4): generators, aliases, and designs for fewer variablesDesign · pp. 139-140Matches
- Adding a second 2^(7-4) fraction: reversing the signs of variable 1 (Possibility 1) or of all variables (Possibility 2), and the estimates of the combined designsDesign · pp. 140-142Matches
- Shrinkage of injection-molded parts: eight variables in a 2^(8-4) resolution IV design obtained by fold-over (Table 5.5)Example · pp. 142-144, 167-168Matches
- The 2^(8-4) resolution IV design in eight blocks of two runs, each block a run and its mirror image (Table 5.6)Design · pp. 144-145Matches
- Combining two fractions from the same family: defining relations, the U-L rule, and Li and Lin's choice of sign changes (Section 5.5)Design · pp. 144-147Matches
- Screening with 2^(k-p) designs: the designs left when variables are dropped (Section 5.6)Design · pp. 148-150Matches
- Complete factorials within fractional factorial designs: projections of resolution R designs onto R - 1 and R variables (Section 5.7)Design · pp. 150-152Matches
- Plackett and Burman design for n = 12 and its projections onto two to five factors (Table 5.7, Figure 5.1)Design · pp. 152-156Matches
- First rows of Plackett and Burman designs for n = 12 to 60 (not 28, 40, 52 or 56), and the run sizes the book listsDesign · pp. 152-155Matches
- Three 9 x 9 construction blocks for the Plackett and Burman design that examines 27 variables in 28 runs (Table 5.8)Design · pp. 153-154Matches
- A characteristic projection of the 12-run Plackett and Burman design into five dimensions, with a pair of repeat runs (Table 5.9(a))Design · pp. 156-157Matches
- A characteristic projection of the 12-run Plackett and Burman design into five dimensions, with a mirror-image pair of runs (Table 5.9(b))Design · pp. 156-157Matches
- Runs needed to estimate all main effects and two-factor interactions of k = 2 to 15 two-level factors (Mee 2004)Design · pp. 158-159Matches
- Rechtschaffner's saturated 22-run design for k = 6 factors (Table 5.10)Design · pp. 158-159Matches
- Tobias's saturated 29-run design for k = 7 factors (Table 5.11)Design · pp. 159-160Matches
- Peter John's 48-run design for k = 8 factors, three-quarters of a 2_V^(8-2) (Table 5.12)Design · pp. 159, 161Matches
- A 64-run design for k = 10 factors, and for k = 9 with x2 omitted (Table 5.13)Design · pp. 159, 162-163Matches
- Construction and blocking of designs of resolution V and higher, 5 to 11 variables, with no main effect or two-factor interaction confounded (Table 5.14)Design · pp. 160, 163Matches
- Two-level fractional designs for k = 3 to 11 variables in N = 4 to 128 runs, with generators and resolutions (Table 5.15)Design · pp. 164-166Matches
- True or false for a 2_R^(k-p) design: k ≥ R, and k ≥ R + p (Exercise 5.1)Design · pp. 168, 639Matches
- A 2_III^(5-2) design with generators I = 1234 = 135 (Exercise 5.2)Design · p. 168Matches
- Two proposed quarter replicates of a 2^5: I = ABCDE = BCDE against I = ABC = BCDE (Exercise 5.3)Design · pp. 168, 639Matches
- Fold-over of the 2_III^(7-4) design I = 1234 = 125 = 146 = 247 to a 2_IV^(8-4) (Exercise 5.4)Design · p. 168Matches
- A 2_IV^(8-4) design generated by I = 1235 = 1246 = 1347 = 2348, to be split in two blocks (Exercise 5.5)Design · p. 168Matches
- Six variables in four blocks of four runs: the 2_IV^(6-2) I = 1235 = 1246 with B1 = 12, B2 = 13 (Exercise 5.6)Design · p. 169Matches
- Six variables in eight blocks of two runs: the 2_IV^(6-2) I = 1235 = 1246 with B1 = 12, B2 = 13, B3 = 14 (Exercise 5.7)Design · p. 169Matches
- A 2^(5-2) with 4 = 123, 5 = 23 followed by its fold-over: the combined 16-run design (Exercise 5.8)Design · pp. 169, 641Matches
- Sixteen runs in six factors that estimate every main effect and every two-factor interaction of factor 1 (Exercise 5.9)Design · pp. 169, 641-642Matches
- The design I = 124 = 135 = 236 followed by the fraction with the signs of 1 and 2 switched (Exercise 5.10)Design · pp. 169, 642Matches
- Effects of a 2_V^(5-1) design in five factors A to E, rounded to the nearest unit, for a normal plot (Exercise 5.14)Exercise · pp. 170-171Matches
- Sixteen runs to estimate six main effects and 12, 123, 13, 14, 15, 16, 23, 24: does such a design exist? (Exercise 5.11)Design · pp. 170, 642Matches
- Identify the design of Table E5.15, four factors in eight runs, and analyse it with V(y) = 2 (Exercise 5.15)Exercise · p. 171Misprint found
- Identify and analyse the five-factor design of Table E5.16, eight runs read twice (Exercise 5.16)Exercise · pp. 171-172Misprint found
- Business at Ozzie's Bar and Grill: six factors in a 2_III^(6-3) fraction, I = 124 = -135 = 236 (Exercise 5.19, Table E5.19)Exercise · pp. 172-173Misprint found
- A 2_V^(5-1) design defined by I = -12345, to be divided into four blocks (Exercise 5.17)Design · p. 172Matches
- The (B1, B2) = (+, +) block of a 2^(7-1), I = 1234567, blocked by B1 = 1357, B2 = 1256 (Exercise 5.18)Design · pp. 172, 643-644Matches
- Business at Ozzie's Bar and Grill: both fractions, with the second fraction's calculation matrix from the answer, analysed apart and together (Exercise 5.19)Exercise · pp. 173, 175, 644-646Matches
- Williams's 28-run Plackett and Burman type design for 24 variables, with cross products and effects (Exercise 5.20, Table E5.20)Exercise · pp. 174-175Misprint found
- Business at Ozzie's Bar and Grill: the second fraction, chosen to estimate Miss Freeny's effect and her interactions (Exercise 5.19)Exercise · p. 175Matches
- A partially replicated 2^3 factorial, analysed by regression with a full factorial model (Exercise 5.21, Table E5.21)Exercise · p. 175Matches
- Dry strip-shear strength of plywood glued with a sucrose-modified phenolic resin: six variables in a 2_IV^(6-2) (Exercise 5.22)Exercise · pp. 175-177Misprint found
- Cutting-tool temperature: a first-order model in ln T for five variables in a 2_V^(5-1), each run read twice (Exercise 5.23, Table E5.23)Exercise · pp. 177-178Very close
- Sales ratings of a dairy company's delivery rounds against five yes-or-no factors in eight runs (Exercise 5.26, Table E5.26)Exercise · pp. 178-179Matches
- Nine variables in 16 runs with clear main effects: no 2_IV^(9-5) exists; the answer's 2_III^(9-5) (Exercise 5.24)Design · pp. 178, 648Misprint found
- Variables 4 and 7 dropped from the 2_III^(7-4) design I = 124 = 235 = 136 = 1237 (Exercise 5.25)Design · p. 178Matches
- Time to pack 100 standard items: a 2_III^(7-4) with I = -126 = 135 = -237 = -1234, then its fold-over (Exercise 5.27)Exercise · p. 179Matches
- Time to pack 100 standard items: the two 2_III^(7-4) tables of the answer, with columns 4 to 7, analysed apart and together (Exercise 5.27)Exercise · pp. 179, 649-650Matches
- Seven runs of an eight-run 2^(k-p) design recovered by an industrial spy (Exercise 5.28, Table E5.28)Exercise · pp. 179-180Matches
- Water quality: four factors on columns 1 to 4 of the 12-run Plackett and Burman design (Exercise 5.31)Exercise · p. 180Misprint found
- The Plackett and Burman design for n = 8 from the signs + + + - + - -, identified as a 2_III^(7-4) (Exercise 5.30)Design · pp. 180, 651Matches
- A five-factor 16-run factorial experiment with an additional problem to find (Exercise 5.32, Table E5.32)Exercise · p. 181Misprint found
- Growth of mice: eight factors screened in a replicated 2_IV^(8-4) in eight blocks of two with centre runs, 94 mice surviving (Exercise 5.33)Exercise · pp. 181-184Not yet explained
- Force to open the closure of a medical infusion bottle: seven molding variables in a 2_III^(7-4), three readings per run (Exercise 5.34)Exercise · p. 184Matches
- Bread making: four ingredients in a 2_IV^(4-1) with three runs repeated, then four semifold runs (Exercise 5.35)Exercise · p. 185Matches
- Screening seven variables, at most four of them important, in a 2^(7-3) generated by I = 1235 = 1246 = 1347 (Exercise 5.36, Table E5.36)Exercise · p. 186Misprint found
- Percentage yield of a reaction in drug manufacture: five factors in a 2^(5-1) resolution V fraction, the path of steepest ascent and its confidence coneExample · pp. 189-197Differs
- Activity of a chemical mixture in three active ingredients and a diluent: the path of steepest ascent from a 2^3 factorial, turned along the constraint A + B + C ≤ 100Example · pp. 197-201Misprint found
Pages 200 to 299
- Steepest ascent in two variables: a 2^2 factorial with a centre point, six runs on or near the path, then eight runs with repeats to test lack of fit (Exercise 6.1)Exercise · pp. 207-208, 655-656Matches
- Is a point on the path of steepest ascent? A 2^2 factorial with a centre point in coded units (Exercise 6.2)Exercise · pp. 208, 656Matches
- Circular saw blades: can blade life above 21.5 h and unit cost below 54 cents be had together, from two first-order equations (Exercise 6.6)Exercise · pp. 209, 657Matches
- Cycles to failure of worsted yarn: length, amplitude and load in a 3^3 factorial, fitted by first-, second- and third-degree polynomials to Y and to log YExample · pp. 211-226, 230-244Differs
- Two sets of data on a Box-Behnken design in four variables and three blocks, fitted by least squares and by iteratively reweighted least squaresExample · pp. 226-230Misprint found
- Mean, linear and quadratic orthogonal components of three observations at three equally spaced levelsExample · pp. 238-240Matches
- The nine orthogonal components of a 3² factorial: mean, linear, quadratic and their productsDesign · p. 240Matches
- All-bias central composite designs for a spherical region: centre runs, cube and star distancesDesign · pp. 244-248Matches
- A 3² factorial in x1 and x2 with a log response: first-, second- and third-order models, Tukey's test and confidence limits (Exercises 7.1 to 7.6)Exercise · pp. 248-249Close
- A 3^3 factorial from Davies (1956), p. 333: second-order fit, Tukey's test and the 3^k algorithm (Exercise 7.7)Exercise · pp. 249-250Not yet explained
- Washing performance of a detergent: detergent level, sodium carbonate and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose in a 3^3 factorial (Exercise 7.8)Exercise · pp. 250-251Very close
- Application of coloring inks to package labels: speed, pressure and distance of a printing machine in a 3^3 factorial replicated three times (Exercise 7.9)Exercise · p. 251Not yet explained
- Failure stress of sand aggregate pavements: asphalt and sulphur in a replicated 3² factorial (Exercise 7.10)Exercise · p. 252Very close
- A central composite design in two factors with four centre runs: first- and second-order fits, then 37 added to runs 7 to 12 (Exercise 7.11)Exercise · p. 252Misprint found
- A central composite design in two orthogonal blocks: a 2^2 with three centre runs, then four axial runs at ±√2 with three more (Exercise 7.12)Exercise · p. 253Very close
- Twenty-five hypothetical observations of MBT production on a 5 x 5 grid, nine of them a composite design: second-order fits to all and to the nine (Exercise 7.13)Exercise · pp. 253-254Very close
- A central composite design in two factors with axial runs at ±1.5 and four centre runs: second-order fit and contours of the prediction variance (Exercise 7.14)Exercise · p. 254Not yet explained
- Dry ash value of pulp A: temperature and time in a central composite design with duplicate determinations (Exercise 7.15)Exercise · pp. 254-255Very close
- Yield of mercaptobenzothiazole: reaction time and temperature, twelve runs then five confirmatory runs, second-order fits (Exercise 7.16)Exercise · pp. 255-257Not yet explained
- Taylor's tool life equation: two variables at uncoded settings with four observations each (Exercise 7.17)Exercise · pp. 256-257Very close
- Potato yield against nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium: maximize a fitted second-order equation subject to a specific gravity constraint (Exercise 7.18)Exercise · p. 258Matches
- A central composite design in three factors with duplicated axial runs at ±2 and four centre runs (Exercise 7.21)Exercise · p. 260Misprint found
- Cutting-tool temperature: speed, feed and depth of cut in a cube plus doubled star with four centre runs, two sets of 24 tests in random order (Exercise 7.22)Exercise · pp. 260-262Very close
- Cutting-tool temperature: the confirmatory runs to be predicted by the fitted equation (Exercise 7.22)Exercise · p. 262Matches
- Dry strip-shear strength of plywood glued with a sucrose-modified phenolic resin: sucrose, paraform, NaOH and water in a Box-Behnken design in three orthogonal blocks (Exercise 7.23)Exercise · pp. 262-264Very close
- Yield of an agronomic trial in a dodecahedron design with ten centre points in five orthogonal blocks, two replicates (Exercise 7.24)Exercise · pp. 264-265Very close
- Chemical process improvement: a composite design in three factors with unequal axial distances and four centre runs, two responses (Exercise 7.25)Exercise · pp. 265-266Very close
- Extraction of silica from quartz: quartz size, time, temperature and sodium hydroxide concentration in a central composite design, its axial runs a second block (Exercise 7.26)Exercise · pp. 266-267Very close
- Brookfield viscosity of a sterilized concentrated baby formula after 0, 3, 6 and 9 months: five additives in a 2^(5-1) plus axial and centre runs (Exercise 7.27)Exercise · pp. 266-269Differs
- Six responses on a two-factor, third-order, rotatable, orthogonally blocked design: a circle of eight points, a circle of seven points and six centre runs in three blocks (Exercise 7.28)Exercise · pp. 269-270Not yet explained
- Numerical values of the contractive transformations Y^1/2, log10 Y, Y^-1/2 and Y^-1 over Y = 1 to 4Example · pp. 271-272Matches
- Cycles to failure of worsted yarn (3^3, Barella and Sust): estimation adequacy, the log metric and a Box-Cox powerExample · pp. 280-292Differs
- Polymer formed against catalyst charge: estimating the power of a predictor by Box and Tidwell's linearizationExample · pp. 296-298Very close
Pages 300 to 399
- Exercise 8.4: Mooney viscosities ML4 and MS4 of filled, plasticized NBR against silica and oil, a Box-Cox power for eachExercise · p. 300Not yet explained
- Exercise 8.5: Mooney viscosity ML4 against two silicas and a carbon black, choosing a Box-Cox power for a first-order modelExercise · pp. 300-302Differs
- Exercise 8.6: washing performance against detergent, sodium carbonate and carboxymethyl cellulose (3^3, Feuell and Wagg 1949)Exercise · pp. 301-302Differs
- Polymer elasticity: a 2^3 factorial around the best conditions so far shows large interactions, so the first-degree model failsExample · pp. 304-306Matches
- Polymer elasticity: a central composite design in two orthogonal blocks, its fitted maximum and its residual degrees of freedom isolatedExample · pp. 305-318Very close
- Exercise 9.1: yield of an ester analogue of jojoba oil against temperature, catalyst and pressure, a central composite design in two blocksExercise · pp. 318-319Very close
- Canonical analysis of a constructed second-degree equation in two variables: the A and B canonical forms of a maximumExample · pp. 331-334, 339-340Matches
- Elasticity of a polymer against two concentrations and temperature: B canonical analysis of the fitted second-degree equation, a point maximum (Section 10.3, Example 1)Example · pp. 335-337Close
- The theoretical second-degree systems in three variables and their limiting ridge forms, by the signs of θ and λ (Table 11.1, Figure 11.3)Design · pp. 344-346Differs
- The canonical analysis of the constructed equation in two variables summarized as slopes, curvatures, distances and changes (Example 11.1)Example · pp. 346-348Matches
- The canonical analysis of the polymer elasticity equation summarized as slopes, curvatures, distances and changes (Example 11.2)Example · p. 348Matches
- Percentage yield of a consecutive chemical system against temperature, catalyst concentration and time: a composite design whose fitted surface is a near-stationary planar ridge (Example 11.3)Example · pp. 348-353Not yet explained
- Concentration of product in a small continuous reactor: a composite design in four blocks, whose fitted surface is a rising ridge (Example 11.4)Example · pp. 353-359, 366Not yet explained
- Percentage yield of a two-stage chemical process against two temperatures, two reaction times and a concentration: a stationary ridge in five variables (Example 11.5)Example · pp. 359-363Differs
- Consumption of detergent in scouring raw wool against the temperatures of the first two bowls, a 4 × 4 factorial (Exercise 11.1)Exercise · pp. 366-367Very close
- Abrasion index, modulus, elongation and hardness of a tire tread compound against silica, silane and sulfur levels, a central composite design (Exercise 11.5)Exercise · pp. 367-368Not yet explained
- Canonical reduction of two fitted second-degree equations in two variables (Exercise 11.2)Exercise · p. 367Matches
- Canonical analysis of three fitted second-degree equations in two variables (Exercise 11.3)Exercise · p. 367Misprint found
- Canonical reduction of four fitted second-degree equations in two variables given by their coefficients (Exercise 11.4)Exercise · p. 367Misprint found
- Catalytic isomerization of n-pentane: a central composite design with four centre runs, and six further runs to check predictions (Exercise 11.6)Exercise · pp. 368-369Not yet explained
- Survival of motile bovine spermatozoa after storage against sodium citrate, glycerol and equilibration time, a composite design with α = 2 (Exercise 11.7)Exercise · pp. 369-370Very close
- Yield of tomato tops in North Gower clay loam against nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium: a replicated composite design enclosed in a replicated 3^3 (Exercise 11.8)Exercise · pp. 370-372Differs
- Yield of tomato tops in Castor silt loam: a replicated composite design and a wider 3^3 factorial that encloses it (Exercise 11.9)Exercise · pp. 372-373Not yet explained
- Conversion of naphthalene to phthalic anhydride and by-products against air ratio, contact time and bed temperature, 80 observations (Exercise 11.11)Exercise · pp. 375-377Not yet explained
- Canonical form of a fitted second-degree equation in three variables (Exercise 11.12)Exercise · p. 377Matches
- Canonical analysis of four fitted second-degree equations in three variables given by their coefficients (Exercise 11.13)Exercise · p. 378Very close
- Canonical reduction of fitted surfaces for the dry modulus of rupture and the drying shrinkage of a ceramic (Exercise 11.14)Exercise · p. 378Very close
- Canonical form of the fitted flakiness of a pie crust against flour, water and shortening (Exercise 11.15)Exercise · pp. 378-379Misprint found
- Whiteness, absorbency and fluidity of cotton bleached in a pressure kier against temperature, time, peroxide and NaOH, 35 runs (Exercise 11.17)Exercise · pp. 379-381Not yet explained
- Fired absorption of whiteware against three raw-material ratios and the firing temperature (Exercise 11.18)Exercise · pp. 381-382Not yet explained
- A response of starch vinylation against five coded variables: a half fraction 2^(5-1) with ten axial and six centre runs (Exercise 11.19)Exercise · pp. 382-383Not yet explained
- Tensile strength of a silica-filled rubber compound against five ingredients: a central composite design in three blocks (Exercise 11.20)Exercise · pp. 383-384Not yet explained
- Canonical reduction of fitted yield and purity surfaces in five process and catalyst variables (Exercise 11.21)Exercise · pp. 384-385Misprint found
- Yield of lettuce tops against copper, molybdenum and iron, a composite design with x3 = -0.5 in place of -1, for four sources of nitrogen and iron (Exercise 11.22)Exercise · pp. 385-387Not yet explained
- Shell weight of eggs as a percentage of egg weight against dietary calcium and phosphorus, a 3^2 with three hens' eggs at each diet (Exercise 11.23)Exercise · pp. 387-388Very close
- Depth of a crater worn by a carbide cutting tool over a grid of positions, 50 observations, for second- and third-order surfaces (Exercise 11.24)Exercise · p. 388Not yet explained
- Hardness, cohesiveness, springiness and compressible water of a whey protein gel against cysteine and calcium chloride, a central composite design with five centre runs (Exercise 11.25)Exercise · pp. 388-389Very close
- Hoerl's saddle in two factors: the ridge of maximum response from the origin, and the four stationary pathsExample · pp. 394-398Very close
Pages 400 to 499
- Ridge trace of maximum yield from the origin for the second-order fit of Exercise 9.1, worked in MINITABExample · pp. 400-404Very close
- Exercise 12.2: corn yield against nitrogen and phosphate, two fitted second-order models to compare by ridge analysisExercise · pp. 404-405, 710Misprint found
- Exercise 12.3: path of maximum response for a six-factor fitted surface of a flexible manufacturing systemExercise · pp. 405, 710Close
- Exercise 12.4: six properties of edible wheat gluten films against gluten, ethanol and pH in a central composite designExercise · pp. 405-406, 711-712Differs
- Exercise 12.5: the ridge paths 2, 3 and 4 of Hoerl's saddleExercise · pp. 406, 713Differs
- Exercise 12.6: ridge paths of maximum cohesiveness and springiness of heat-induced whey protein gelsExercise · pp. 406-407, 713-714Differs
- Exercise 12.7: ridge path of maximum silicon dioxide etch rate against power, pressure, H2 and flow rateExercise · pp. 407, 714-715Very close
- Exercise 12.8: ridge path of maximum yield of lettuce tops for Exercise 11.22's surface (source 1)Exercise · pp. 407-408, 715-716Differs
- Exercise 12.9: removal of nucleic acids from single-cell protein, a four-factor cube plus star plus five centre pointsExercise · pp. 408-409, 716-718Differs
- Exercise 12.10: NBS abrasion resistance of a rubber compound in a three-factor composite designExercise · pp. 409, 718-720Very close
- Exercise 12.11: viscosity of foliole puree of hearts of palm after cellulase and pectinase treatmentsExercise · pp. 409-410, 720-721Differs
- Exercise 12.12: tensile strength of silica filled natural rubber in a third-order rotatable design in three blocksExercise · pp. 410-411, 721-724Very close
- Exercise 12.13: tensile strength, impact, gloss and izod of an easy flow Rovel grade against four injection molding variablesExercise · pp. 411-412, 724Differs
- Two three-point designs for a straight line over -1 to 1: integrated variance against integrated squared biasDesign · pp. 415-419Matches
- Example 13.1: a 2^3 factorial at plus or minus 0.447 minimizes squared bias from second-order terms over the unit sphereDesign · pp. 425-427Matches
- Example 13.2: a composite design in three factors that minimizes squared bias from third-order terms over the unit sphereDesign · pp. 427-429Matches
- Example 13.3, design A: the 2^2 factorial (+-1, +-1), and the quadratic lack of fit it can detectDesign · pp. 431-434Matches
- Example 13.3, design B: the 2^2 factorial turned through 45 degrees, its points at 2^1/2 on the axes, and the quadratic lack of fit it can detectDesign · pp. 431-434Matches
- A 2^(8-4) resolution IV fraction with centre points: a first-order design for eight variables that checks combinations of quadratic termsDesign · pp. 434-436Matches
- A nine-run three-level fraction in four variables for estimating the linear and pure quadratic terms, a Graeco-Latin squareDesign · pp. 437-438Matches
- A two-block composite design in two factors with manufactured data: lack of fit split into cubic and curvature contrastsExample · pp. 439-445Very close
- Exercise 13.1: a six-point all-bias design for a straight line on [-1, 1] guarding against a cubicExercise · pp. 457, 724Matches
- Exercise 13.2: six ten-point designs at five levels for a quadratic, guarding against a cubic termDesign · pp. 458, 725Matches
- A 2^2 factorial in temperature and concentration, in original and coded units: coding, orthogonality, information function and scaleless DDesign · pp. 463-465, 478, 481Matches
- The 3^2 factorial used as a second-order design: X, X'X, (X'X)^-1, information function and D valueDesign · pp. 466-468, 478-480Matches
- Rotatable second-order designs in k = 2: eight points on a circle with centre points, and the information profile set by λDesign · pp. 468-470Matches
- The central composite design for k = 3: the axial distance that makes it rotatableDesign · pp. 469-470Matches
- A 13-run design roughly approximating Fedorov's D/G-optimal measure on the squareDesign · pp. 473, 475Matches
- Sequential assembly of a three-factor composite design in three orthogonal blocks of six runsDesign · pp. 484-485Matches
- A regular simplex first-order design for k = 3 in N = 4 runs (Box 1952)Design · pp. 487-488Matches
- The regular simplex extended to k = 4 in N = 5 runsDesign · p. 488Matches
- Relative replication of star and cube for composite designs both rotatable and orthogonally blocked (Table 15.1)Design · pp. 489-490Matches
- A useful second-order composite design for k = 2 and its characteristics (Table 15.2)Design · pp. 491-492Matches
- A useful second-order composite design for k = 3 and its characteristics (Table 15.2)Design · pp. 491-492Matches
- A useful second-order composite design for k = 4 and its characteristics (Table 15.2)Design · pp. 491-492Matches
- A useful second-order composite design for k = 5 and its characteristics (Table 15.2)Design · pp. 491-492Matches
- A useful second-order composite design for k = 5 on a 1/2 fraction and its characteristics (Table 15.2)Design · pp. 491-492Matches
- A useful second-order composite design for k = 6 on a 1/2 fraction and its characteristics (Table 15.2)Design · pp. 491-492Matches
- A useful second-order composite design for k = 7 on a 1/2 fraction and its characteristics (Table 15.2)Design · pp. 491-492Matches
- A useful second-order composite design for k = 8 on a 1/4 fraction and its characteristics (Table 15.2)Design · pp. 491-492Matches
- Orthogonally blocked second-order designs for four factors, and the axial distances for six choices of centre points (Tables 15.3 and 15.4)Design · pp. 492-494Matches
- An orthogonally blocked second-order design for five factors in 49 runs (Table 15.5)Design · pp. 492, 494Matches
- An orthogonally blocked second-order design for six factors in 54 runs (Table 15.6)Design · pp. 492, 495Matches
- The three-level Box-Behnken design for four factors in three orthogonal blocks of nine runs (Tables 15.7, 15.8 and 15.9)Design · pp. 495-498Matches
- The three-level Box-Behnken second-order design for 3 factors in 15 runs (Table 15.9)Design · pp. 497-498Matches
- The three-level Box-Behnken second-order design for 5 factors in 46 runs (Table 15.9)Design · pp. 497-498Matches
- The three-level Box-Behnken second-order design for 6 factors in 54 runs (Table 15.9)Design · pp. 497-498Matches
- The three-level Box-Behnken second-order design for 7 factors in 62 runs (Table 15.9)Design · pp. 497-498Matches
- A 27-run, 13-variable three-level screening design that fits a full quadratic model in any five factors (Table 15.10)Design · pp. 499-500Matches
- A 24-run, eight-variable three-level screening design that fits a full quadratic model in any five factors (Table 15.11)Design · pp. 499-500Misprint found
Pages 500 to 599
- Points needed by some small composite designs, k = 2 to 9 (Table 15.12)Design · p. 501Matches
- Five columns of the 12-run Plackett-Burman design with a pair of repeat runs, the cube of a 21-run small composite design (Table 15.13a)Design · pp. 501-503Matches
- Five columns of the 12-run Plackett-Burman design with a mirror-image pair of runs (Table 15.13b)Design · pp. 501-503Matches
- Koshal's first-order design for k = 2 in N = p = 3 runsDesign · p. 503Matches
- Koshal's first-order design for k = 4 in N = p = 5 runsDesign · p. 503Matches
- Koshal's second-order design (a) for k = 3 in N = p = 10 runs (Table 15.14a)Design · pp. 503-504Matches
- Koshal's second-order design (b) for k = 3 in N = p = 10 runs, a less asymmetric pattern (Table 15.14b)Design · pp. 503-504Matches
- A composite design in k = 2 with four centre points: rotatable axial distance and the variance two units from the origin (Exercise 15.1)Exercise · pp. 504-505Matches
- Koshal's third-order design for k = 3 in N = p = 20 runs (Table 15.15)Design · p. 504Matches
- Herzberg's nine-point design in k = 2: estimability, rotatability, variance function and bias (Exercise 15.2)Exercise · p. 505Matches
- The simplex-sum construction of composite designs from 2^(3-1) and 2^(7-4) fractions (Exercise 15.4)Exercise · p. 505Matches
- A rotatable composite design in k = 3 with n0 centre points: V(r), and the centre runs that make V(0) = V(1) (Exercise 15.3)Exercise · p. 505Matches
- Thornquist's twelve-point design: an icosahedron on the unit sphere that needs centre points (Exercise 15.5)Exercise · p. 506Matches
- A three-factor composite design in three blocks: the axial distance for orthogonal blocking (Exercise 15.6)Exercise · p. 506Matches
- A four-factor composite design in three blocks, orthogonally blocked and rotatable at α = 2 (Exercise 15.7)Exercise · pp. 506-507Matches
- Composite designs with a replicated star, 2 <= k <= 8: which are both rotatable and orthogonally blocked (Exercise 15.8)Exercise · p. 507Matches
- Door-closing effort in a randomized Draper-Lin small composite design for General Motors (Exercise 15.10)Exercise · pp. 507-508Matches
- A first-order Scheffé model fitted to seven blends of three ingredients (Table 16.1)Example · pp. 514-515Close
- Research octane of gasoline blends of light FCC, alkylate, butane and reformate: first-order Scheffé fits (Table 16.2, Snee 1973)Example · pp. 515-516Very close
- Ten blends of three ingredients: quadratic and special cubic Scheffé fits (Table 16.3, adapted from Busch and Phelan 1999)Example · pp. 517-521Very close
- The {2, 2} simplex lattice: 3 blends of 2 components in steps of 1/2Design · pp. 522-524Matches
- The {3, 2} simplex lattice: 6 blends of 3 components in steps of 1/2Design · pp. 522-524Matches
- The {4, 2} simplex lattice: 10 blends of 4 components in steps of 1/2Design · pp. 522-524Matches
- The {2, 3} simplex lattice: 4 blends of 2 components in steps of 1/3Design · pp. 522-524Matches
- The {3, 3} simplex lattice: 10 blends of 3 components in steps of 1/3Design · pp. 522-524Matches
- The {4, 3} simplex lattice: 20 blends of 4 components in steps of 1/3Design · pp. 523-524Matches
- The {3, 2} simplex lattice with its centroid and three axial points halfway to the vertices: ten blends (Figure 16.10)Design · pp. 524-525Matches
- Scheffé's simplex centroid design for four components: fifteen blends for the special cubic's fourteen coefficientsDesign · pp. 525-526Matches
- A second-order mixture polynomial fitted exactly to a {3, 2} simplex lattice, and a t-test of the prediction at the centroid (Exercise 16.5, Table E16.5)Exercise · pp. 531, 731Misprint found
- A third-order mixture polynomial fitted exactly to a {3, 3} simplex lattice (Exercise 16.6, Table E16.6)Exercise · pp. 531-532, 731Misprint found
- Volume shrinkage of ternary container media of sand, pine bark and calcined clay: quadratic or special cubic? (Exercise 16.7, Table E16.7, Bures, Pokorny and Ware 1992)Exercise · pp. 532, 731Matches
- Modulus of elasticity of a propellant of binder, oxidizer and fuel with lower bounds: quadratic and special cubic fits in pseudocomponents and in proportions (Table 17.1, Kurotori 1966)Example · pp. 537-542Not yet explained
- Illumination of flares of magnesium, sodium nitrate, strontium nitrate and binder: McLean and Anderson's extreme vertices design and its quadratic fit (Tables 17.2 and 17.3)Example · pp. 545-549Not yet explained
- Viscosity and clear point of detergent formulations of water, alcohol and urea: second-order fits in pseudocomponents (Exercise 17.5, Table E17.5, Narcy and Renaud 1972)Exercise · pp. 551, 733Misprint found
- Cake volume and top contour of cakes whose five ingredients are set by four ratios in a central composite design (Kissell and Marshall 1962)Example · pp. 555-561Misprint found
- Proportion of mice responding to blends of three hormones at three total doses, in two blocks of 30 runs: mixture-amount and component-amount models (Claringbold 1955)Example · pp. 561-570Not yet explained
- The {4, 3} simplex lattice in four ingredients, the design projected into component-amount designsDesign · pp. 570-571Matches
- A component-amount design in three ingredients at four total amounts, the {4, 3} simplex lattice with one column removedDesign · pp. 571-573Matches
- A component-amount design in two ingredients, the {4, 3} simplex lattice with two columns removedDesign · pp. 572-574Matches
- Component-amount designs from the {5, 3} and {5, 4} simplex lattices with one, two or three columns removedDesign · pp. 574-576Matches
- A component-amount design in three ingredients at five amounts, the four-ingredient simplex centroid with one column removedDesign · p. 577Matches
- A component-amount design in four ingredients at six amounts, the five-ingredient simplex centroid with one column removedDesign · pp. 577-578Matches
- A component-amount design in three ingredients, the five-ingredient simplex centroid with two columns removedDesign · p. 578Misprint found
- The D-optimal component-amount design for two ingredients in two orthogonal blocks, Table 18.13 with x3 removedDesign · pp. 579-581Very close
- Designs of type A: a four-ingredient mixture design in two orthogonal blocks from two pairs of mated 4 x 4 Latin squares, and its three-ingredient component-amount projectionDesign · pp. 581-583Matches
- Design A1: a nearly optimal component-amount design of type A for three ingredients in two orthogonal blocksDesign · pp. 583-585Matches
- Design A2: a nearly optimal component-amount design of type A for three ingredients in two orthogonal blocksDesign · pp. 583-585Matches
- Designs of type B: a four-ingredient mixture design in two orthogonal blocks from two pairs of mated 4 x 4 Latin squares, and its three-ingredient component-amount projectionDesign · pp. 585-587Matches
- A nearly optimal component-amount design of type B for three ingredients in two orthogonal blocksDesign · pp. 585-587Matches
- A nearly optimal component-amount design of type C for three ingredients in two orthogonal blocksDesign · pp. 587-589Matches
- A bread-making experiment in four blocks: a nearly D-optimal four-ingredient mixture design in orthogonal blocks, fitted in all four and in the first two ingredients (Draper, Prescott et al. 1993)Example · pp. 589-592Very close
- Dissolution of 14 tablet blends of binder, disintegrant, surfactant and other ingredients: a Scheffé quadratic and a component-amount fit (Exercise 18.1; Cornell and Gorman 2003)Exercise · pp. 592-593Very close
- Solubility of a four-ingredient pharmaceutical mixture on an extreme-vertices design, and its ridge paths under linear restrictionsExample · pp. 596-615Misprint found
Pages 600 to 699
- Becker's ratio-term mixture model against the Scheffé quadratic on the solubility data (Exercise 19.1)Exercise · pp. 615-616, 735-736Very close
- Modulus of elasticity of a propellant (binder, oxidizer, fuel) with lower bounds: ridge path of maximum response (Exercise 19.3)Exercise · pp. 616, 737-738Matches
- Shrinkage of a three-ingredient plant-growing medium: ridge path of maximum response from the centroid (Exercise 19.4)Exercise · pp. 616, 738-739Matches
- Four bread flours: ridge paths of maximum response from the x1 = 0 boundary, followed onto x4 = 0 (Exercise 19.5)Exercise · pp. 616-617, 739-740Matches
- A dog-leg path of steepest ascent that turns along the plane x1 + x2 + 0.5x3 = −2.6 (Exercise 19.6)Exercise · pp. 617, 740-741Matches
- Glass transition temperature of pseudolatex films with three nonionic surfactants: path of minimum response (Exercise 19.7)Exercise · pp. 617, 741-742Differs
- Canonical reduction under the mixture restriction of a three-ingredient shrinkage surfaceExample · pp. 625-627Differs
- Canonical reduction under the mixture restriction of a five-ingredient cake-quality surface, whose stationary point lies far outside the regionExample · pp. 627-628Matches
Misprints
Misprints found in the book, by page. Each shows what the book prints and what its own data give.
Book 94Data 79
A slip: this run's ŷ is 2.745 - 0.375 - 0.295 - 0.175 = 1.90 (Table 2.3), whose antilog is 79.4; 94 is not the antilog of any fitted value of the plane
A book slip: the (1,1) element is 41192/94624 = 0.435323, printed 0.435321; the other eight elements reproduce
Book 78.614709Data 78.614500
A book slip: the data give 78.614533; the book's six-decimal coefficients do not solve its own normal equations (Z'Z times them is 344.18, 439.08, 3069.40 for Z'y = 344.2, 439.1, 3069.7)
Coefficient: xp. 39
Book 3.106313Data 3.106240
A book slip: the data give 3.106244; the book's six-decimal coefficients do not solve its own normal equations (Z'Z times them is 344.18, 439.08, 3069.40 for Z'y = 344.2, 439.1, 3069.7)
Coefficient: x²p. 39
Book -1.263149Data -1.262820
A book slip: the data give -1.262821; the book's six-decimal coefficients do not solve its own normal equations (Z'Z times them is 344.18, 439.08, 3069.40 for Z'y = 344.2, 439.1, 3069.7)
Show the rest
Marginal interval: coefficient of (β1 - β̂1)²p. 67
Book 25/36Data 1.44
A book error: the coefficient is 1/V(b1) = 36/25 = 1.44, V = 25/36 by (3.12.16), as Design A's 4 is 1/(1/4); the book prints the variance 25/36 itself
Marginal interval: coefficient of (β2 - β̂2)², printed with β1p. 67
Book 25/36Data 1.44
A book error: the coefficient is 1/V(b2) = 36/25 = 1.44, V = 25/36 by (3.12.16); the book prints the variance 25/36 itself, and β1 for β2
Residual: brightness, x1 x4 x6 ---, x2 x3 x5 +-- (run 3)p. 107
Book -3Data 3
A sign slip: run 3's brightness is 37 (Tables 4.4 and 4.6) and its fitted value 34.03, so the residual is +3
Designp. 175
Book 24Data 23
Columns 13 and 16 of Table E5.20 are printed identical, as are their CP (-321) and EF (-23), so the 24 main effects have rank 23; the book's own answer (p. 646) says the two columns are identical and drops 16
Aliases: 124p. 177
Book 124 + 345 + 136 + 2456Data 136, 256, 345
With I = 1235 = 2346 = 1456 the string of 124 is 124 + 345 + 136 + 256 (124 × 1456 = 256); the printed 2456 is not an alias of 124
Aliases: 134p. 177
Book 134 + 245 + 126 + 3456Data 126, 245, 356
With I = 1235 = 2346 = 1456 the string of 134 is 134 + 245 + 126 + 356 (134 × 1456 = 356); the printed 3456 is not an alias of 134
N runs: block (x9, x10, x11) = (-1, -1, +1)p. 181
Book 14Data 15
Table E5.33a as printed puts 15 runs in block (x9, x10, x11) = (-1, -1, +1) and 11 in (-1, +1, +1); the text (p. 181) says 14 and 12; all 58 factorial rows obey x9 = 14, x10 = 16, x11 = 17, so either one centre run's x10 (rows 74 to 79 or 86 to 91) or the text's counts are misprinted
N runs: block (x9, x10, x11) = (-1, +1, +1)p. 181
Book 12Data 11
Table E5.33a as printed puts 15 runs in block (x9, x10, x11) = (-1, -1, +1) and 11 in (-1, +1, +1); the text (p. 181) says 14 and 12; all 58 factorial rows obey x9 = 14, x10 = 16, x11 = 17, so either one centre run's x10 (rows 74 to 79 or 86 to 91) or the text's counts are misprinted
Resolutionp. 186
Book IIIData 4
The generators 1235, 1246 and 1347 give I = 1235 = 1246 = 1347 = 3456 = 2457 = 2367 = 1567, seven words of length four, so the design is of resolution IV, not III (the answer's table titles, p. 655, keep III)
Steepest path: direction vector, x1 elementp. 199
Book 2.8Data 3.8
A misprint: (6.5.8) gives b1 = 3.8 and the book uses 3.8 in (6.5.12) to (6.5.16) and Table 6.5, so the vector is (3.8, 2.6, 1.9)
Sum of squares about zero: ΣY²p. 212
Book 40,260,625Data 40260600
The 27 Y of Table 7.1 give ΣY² = 40,260,624; the book's 40,260,625 is one unit high
Fitted: run 7, second-degree Ŷp. 216
Book 210Data 209
The second-degree fit gives Ŷ = 209.4 at run 7; the book's own residual, -39, agrees with 170 - 209.4, so 210 is a slip
Fitted: run 8, second-degree Ŷp. 216
Book 409Data 410
The second-degree fit gives Ŷ = 409.9 at run 8; the book's own residual, 32, agrees with 442 - 409.9, so 409 is a slip
Coefficient: b0, f = infinity, Box and Behnken (1960a) datap. 227
Book 96.60Data 90.60
Least squares gives β0 = 90.60 (numpy agrees); 96.60 is a misprint, the f = 5, 3 and 1 columns printing 90.59, 90.58 and 90.53
Yates column (4): z'y: 02²3²p. 242
Book -1.560Data -1560.000
Z'y = -1,560; the book prints a decimal point for the thousands comma (columns (7) and (8), -14.44 = -1,560/108 and 22,533 = 1,560²/108, use -1,560)
Coefficient: b0p. 262
Book 1.99Data 199.00
B0 = 199.0, the mean of the three centre runs 211, 184 and 202; 1.99 is a misprint
Extra ss: first orderp. 263
Book 1944.5Data 1994.5
The first-order SS is 12Σb² = 12(0.25² + 7.667² + 8.833² + 5.417²) = 1994.5 from the book's own coefficients; 1944.5 transposes two digits
Extra ms: first orderp. 263
Book 486.13Data 498.62
1994.5/4 = 498.63; the book's 486.13 divides the transposed 1944.5
Extra f: first orderp. 263
Book 2.86Data 2.94
498.63/169.76 = 2.94; the book's 2.86 follows from the transposed 1944.5
Extra ss: second order given b0p. 263
Book 3110.8Data 3060.8
The second-order SS is 3060.8; the book's first- plus second-order 5055.3 is right, and 3110.8 is the remainder after its transposed 1944.5
Extra ms: second order given b0p. 263
Book 311.08Data 306.08
3060.8/10 = 306.08; the book's 311.08 follows from the transposed first-order SS
Extra f: second order given b0p. 263
Book 1.83Data 1.80
306.08/169.76 = 1.80; the book's 1.83 follows from the transposed first-order SS
Ss regression: first orderp. 265
Book 19.99Data 19.94
From the book's own totals coefficients, (Σx² = 20)/2 x (0.0552² + 1.4063² + 0.1155²) = 19.94; 19.99 is a slip (its lack of fit, 47.34, would be 47.40)
Ms regression: first orderp. 265
Book 6.663Data 6.647
19.94/3 = 6.647; the book's 6.663 divides its 19.99
Coefficient: b13, the fit to the totals, inside the bracesp. 265
Book -0.1917Data 0.1917
B13 = Σx1x3T/Σ(x1x3)² = 2.3/12 = +0.1917; the sign is a misprint (the other nine coefficients agree)
Coefficient: first-order model: x1p. 265
Book -0.052Data -0.028
Per observation the coefficient is -0.0276, half the totals-fit coefficient; the book prints the totals-fit number unhalved
Coefficient: first-order model: x2p. 265
Book 1.4063Data 0.7032
Per observation the coefficient is 0.7032, half the totals-fit coefficient; the book prints the totals-fit number unhalved
Coefficient: first-order model: x3p. 265
Book 0.1155Data 0.0577
Per observation the coefficient is 0.0577, half the totals-fit coefficient; the book prints the totals-fit number unhalved
Geometric mean: Yp. 290
Book 562.34Data 563.78
The geometric mean of the 27 runs is 563.78, and the book's own S(lambda) table was worked with it (S(0) = 0.2519 needs 563.78; 562.34 gives 0.2506): 562.34 is a misprint
Ss: mean (zero-degree polynomial)p. 309
Book 27,078.0Data 27080.0
N y-bar^2 = 16 x 41.14^2 = 27,080.0 (41.14 = 658.24/16 exactly); the book prints 27,078.0, 2.0 low, and its total 28,571.2 adds its column with that row
Ss: total, uncorrectedp. 309
Book 28,571.2Data 28573.2
Y'y = 28,573.2; the book's 28,571.2 adds its column, whose mean row is 2.0 low (27,078.0 for 27,080.0)
Checking function: l333p. 317
Book -0.32Data 0.32
X3^(3)'y/16 = 5.12/16 = +0.32 from Table 9.5's column x3^(3) and the data; the book prints -0.32 (its sum of squares 16 l333^2 = 1.6 does not depend on the sign)
Ss: Totalp. 355
Book 50,889.6Data 53589.5
Book misprint: Σy² over the 24 runs is 53,589.47, and the table's own rows give 50,517.6 + 3,072.0 = 53,589.6; the printed total is 50,889.6.
Canonical: approximating form, Ẋ3p. 357
Book 6.53Data 6.81
Book slip: (11.4.10) works with λ3 = -0.0925 where (11.4.6) has -0.0965; with the slope m3'b of the fitted equation the coefficient is 6.80762 (and the constant 52.73, not 57.71).
Eigenvector: row 3 of M', x3p. 360
Book 0.255Data 0.225
Book misprint: the element is 0.225386; with the printed 0.255 the squares of row 3 sum to 1.014, with 0.225 to 0.999.
Canonical: constant of X̃4p. 360
Book -1.684Data 1.683
Book slip: with row 4 signed as (11.5.4) prints it, -m4'xS = 1.68257; the printed constant has the sign of the reversed row.
Canonical: constant of X̃5p. 360
Book 2.408Data -2.370
Book slip: with row 5 signed as (11.5.4) prints it, -m5'xS = -2.36973; the printed 2.408 has the sign of the reversed row and differs in size too.
Sum: y1p. 380
Book 250.9Data 252.7
Book misprint: the y1 column of Table E11.17 sums to 252.7; the printed sum is 250.9.
Coefficient: b1, source 1p. 387
Book 6.23Data -6.23
Book sign error: the fit gives -6.23449, and the answer (p. 704) prints b1 = -6.234; Table E11.22c prints +6.23.
Ridge path: lambda = 4.00: x2p. 395
Book 0.06Data 0.05
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 4.00, (12.3.4) gives (0.017, 0.028) and the table prints about (0.03, 0.06); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 4.00: lambdap. 395
Book 4.00Data 2.44
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 4.00, (12.3.4) gives (0.017, 0.028) and the table prints about (0.03, 0.06); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 3.00: x2p. 395
Book 0.08Data 0.07
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 3.00, (12.3.4) gives (0.025, 0.039) and the table prints about (0.05, 0.08); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 3.00: lambdap. 395
Book 3.00Data 1.84
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 3.00, (12.3.4) gives (0.025, 0.039) and the table prints about (0.05, 0.08); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 1.60: x2p. 395
Book 0.18Data 0.17
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 1.60, (12.3.4) gives (0.068, 0.089) and the table prints about (0.14, 0.18); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 1.60: lambdap. 395
Book 1.60Data 1.13
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 1.60, (12.3.4) gives (0.068, 0.089) and the table prints about (0.14, 0.18); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 1.20: x1p. 395
Book 0.25Data 0.26
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 1.20, (12.3.4) gives (0.124, 0.147) and the table prints about (0.25, 0.29); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 1.20: x2p. 395
Book 0.29Data 0.28
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 1.20, (12.3.4) gives (0.124, 0.147) and the table prints about (0.25, 0.29); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 1.20: lambdap. 395
Book 1.20Data 0.93
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 1.20, (12.3.4) gives (0.124, 0.147) and the table prints about (0.25, 0.29); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 1.00: x1p. 395
Book 0.40Data 0.42
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 1.00, (12.3.4) gives (0.202, 0.223) and the table prints about (0.40, 0.45); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 1.00: x2p. 395
Book 0.45Data 0.43
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 1.00, (12.3.4) gives (0.202, 0.223) and the table prints about (0.40, 0.45); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 1.00: lambdap. 395
Book 1.00Data 0.83
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 1.00, (12.3.4) gives (0.202, 0.223) and the table prints about (0.40, 0.45); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.90: x1p. 395
Book 0.58Data 0.60
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.90, (12.3.4) gives (0.290, 0.306) and the table prints about (0.58, 0.61); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.90: x2p. 395
Book 0.61Data 0.59
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.90, (12.3.4) gives (0.290, 0.306) and the table prints about (0.58, 0.61); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.90: lambdap. 395
Book 0.90Data 0.78
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.90, (12.3.4) gives (0.290, 0.306) and the table prints about (0.58, 0.61); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.80: x1p. 395
Book 1.00Data 1.02
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.80, (12.3.4) gives (0.500, 0.500) and the table prints about (1.00, 1.00); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.80: x2p. 395
Book 1.00Data 0.97
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.80, (12.3.4) gives (0.500, 0.500) and the table prints about (1.00, 1.00); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.80: lambdap. 395
Book 0.80Data 0.73
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.80, (12.3.4) gives (0.500, 0.500) and the table prints about (1.00, 1.00); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.78: x1p. 395
Book 1.16Data 1.19
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.78, (12.3.4) gives (0.582, 0.575) and the table prints about (1.16, 1.15); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.78: x2p. 395
Book 1.15Data 1.13
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.78, (12.3.4) gives (0.582, 0.575) and the table prints about (1.16, 1.15); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.78: lambdap. 395
Book 0.78Data 0.72
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.78, (12.3.4) gives (0.582, 0.575) and the table prints about (1.16, 1.15); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.76: x1p. 395
Book 1.39Data 1.41
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.76, (12.3.4) gives (0.694, 0.677) and the table prints about (1.39, 1.35); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.76: x2p. 395
Book 1.35Data 1.33
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.76, (12.3.4) gives (0.694, 0.677) and the table prints about (1.39, 1.35); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.76: lambdap. 395
Book 0.76Data 0.71
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.76, (12.3.4) gives (0.694, 0.677) and the table prints about (1.39, 1.35); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.74: x1p. 395
Book 1.72Data 1.74
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.74, (12.3.4) gives (0.858, 0.826) and the table prints about (1.72, 1.65); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.74: x2p. 395
Book 1.65Data 1.63
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.74, (12.3.4) gives (0.858, 0.826) and the table prints about (1.72, 1.65); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.74: lambdap. 395
Book 0.74Data 0.70
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.74, (12.3.4) gives (0.858, 0.826) and the table prints about (1.72, 1.65); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.72: x1p. 395
Book 2.24Data 2.26
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.72, (12.3.4) gives (1.119, 1.064) and the table prints about (2.24, 2.13); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.72: x2p. 395
Book 2.13Data 2.10
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.72, (12.3.4) gives (1.119, 1.064) and the table prints about (2.24, 2.13); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.72: lambdap. 395
Book 0.72Data 0.69
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.72, (12.3.4) gives (1.119, 1.064) and the table prints about (2.24, 2.13); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.70: x1p. 395
Book 3.20Data 3.23
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.70, (12.3.4) gives (1.600, 1.500) and the table prints about (3.20, 3.00); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.70: x2p. 395
Book 3.00Data 2.97
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.70, (12.3.4) gives (1.600, 1.500) and the table prints about (3.20, 3.00); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Ridge path: lambda = 0.70: lambdap. 395
Book 0.70Data 0.68
The table's points are twice Eq. (12.3.4), x = -(1/2)(B - lambda I)^-1 b, the factor 1/2 of (12.2.8) dropped: at lambda = 0.70, (12.3.4) gives (1.600, 1.500) and the table prints about (3.20, 3.00); such points lie near, not on, the path of maximum y-hat of (12.3.1), so on the sphere of the printed R the library's maximum is elsewhere and its multiplier is not the printed lambda
Lack of fit ms: Lack of fitp. 440
Book 29.691Data 29.641
88.923/3 = 29.641; the printed 29.691 is a misprint
Lack of fit f: Lack of fitp. 440
Book 64.86Data 108.92
The book divides 29.641 by its pure error mean square 0.457, itself 1.480/8 too large (the printed runs give 0.2721); 29.641/0.2721 = 108.92
Extra f: Lack of fit, b111p. 440
Book 16.74Data 28.30
The book divides 7.701 by 0.46, its pure error mean square 0.457 rounded, itself 1.480/8 too large; with the printed runs' 0.2721 the ratio is 28.30
Extra f: Lack of fit, b222p. 440
Book 173.17Data 292.72
The book divides 79.656 by 0.46, its pure error mean square 0.457 rounded, itself 1.480/8 too large; with the printed runs' 0.2721 the ratio is 292.72
Extra f: Lack of fit, CCp. 440
Book 3.14Data 5.76
1.567/0.46 = 3.41, printed with its digits transposed as 3.14, and 0.46 is the book's pure error mean square rounded, itself 1.480/8 too large; with the printed runs' 0.2721 the ratio is 5.76
Pure error ss: Pure errorp. 440
Book 3.657Data 2.177
The printed runs give a pure error of 2.177 on 8 df (cube pairs 1.845, star-block centre points 0.332), mean square 0.2721; the book's 3.657 exceeds it by 1.480, as its total 15,069.910 exceeds Sum y^2 = 15,068.430
Pure error ms: Pure errorp. 440
Book 0.457Data 0.272
The printed runs give a pure error of 2.177 on 8 df (cube pairs 1.845, star-block centre points 0.332), mean square 0.2721; the book's 3.657 exceeds it by 1.480, as its total 15,069.910 exceeds Sum y^2 = 15,068.430
Ms residual: s_e^2p. 440
Book 0.457Data 0.272
The printed runs give a pure error of 2.177 on 8 df (cube pairs 1.845, star-block centre points 0.332), mean square 0.2721; the book's 3.657 exceeds it by 1.480, as its total 15,069.910 exceeds Sum y^2 = 15,068.430
Sum of squares: Total, uncorrectedp. 440
Book 15,069.910Data 15068.400
Sum y^2 of the printed runs is 15,068.430; the printed total exceeds it by the 1.480 that the printed pure error exceeds the data's
Pure error ss: transformed predictors: Pure errorp. 444
Book 3.657Data 2.177
The printed runs give a pure error of 2.177 on 8 df (cube pairs 1.845, star-block centre points 0.332), mean square 0.2721; the book's 3.657 exceeds it by 1.480, as its total 15,069.910 exceeds Sum y^2 = 15,068.430; Table 13.9 repeats Table 13.8's figure, and pure error does not depend on the predictors
Pure error ms: transformed predictors: Pure errorp. 444
Book 0.457Data 0.272
The printed runs give a pure error of 2.177 on 8 df (cube pairs 1.845, star-block centre points 0.332), mean square 0.2721; the book's 3.657 exceeds it by 1.480, as its total 15,069.910 exceeds Sum y^2 = 15,068.430; Table 13.9 repeats Table 13.8's figure, and pure error does not depend on the predictors
Sum of squares: transformed predictors: Totalp. 444
Book 15,069.910Data 15068.400
Sum y^2 of the printed runs is 15,068.430; Table 13.9 repeats Table 13.8's total, 1.480 too large like its pure error
Projections: any five factorsp. 500
Book 0Data 21
21 of the 56 five-factor projections, each containing factor 8, cannot fit the full quadratic; with levels 0 and 1 of column 8 swapped every projection fits, so column 8 appears misprinted (in the book or its source)
Ms residual: first-order modelp. 515
Book 0.196Data 0.020
(20.790 - 20.692)/5 = 0.0196 (unrounded 0.01969); the printed 0.196 is a decimal slip
Extra f: H0: β1 = β2 = β3p. 516
Book 0.0155Data 0.7856
The printed 0.0155 is the extra mean square (20.692 - 20.661)/2, not divided by s²; F = 0.0155/0.0197 = 0.79
Sequential ss: z3 after z1 and z2p. 540
Book 16.157Data 16.154
The sequential sum of squares of z3 is 16.154; the book's three values add to 73.028, not the 73.025 it states
Coefficient: x3, special cubicp. 540
Book 3.673Data 35.672
The x3 coefficient of the special cubic in x is 35.673; the printed 3.673 drops a digit
Coefficient: x1·x2·x3, special cubicp. 540
Book −767.62Data 767.624
The x1x2x3 coefficient is +767.62 (6.141/0.2^3); the printed minus sign is a misprint
R squared: the ratio fit, Eq. 18.2.9p. 558
Book 0.9063Data 0.9627
The book prints R² = 0.9063 beside its own 96.3%; the fit gives 0.9627, the 96.3%, so 0.9063 is a misprint
Coefficient: x2·x3p. 560
Book -6202Data -6206
A misprint: the fit gives -6205.9, that is -6206, while the other 14 coefficients of Eq. 18.2.10, up to 1,904,909, agree to the unit
Extra ms: Extra for A (first order)p. 567
Book 2,195Data 2194
A slip: the book prints 2,195 for its own 6,582/3 = 2,194 (2,193.9 from the fit)
Extra f: Extra for A (first order)p. 567
Book 38.51Data 38.48
The book divides its mean square 2,195 (a slip for 2,194) by s² rounded to 57.0, 2,195/57.0 = 38.51; unrounded, 2,193.9/57.016 = 38.48
R squared: model 7p. 569
Book 0.699Data 0.735
The book prints model 7's adjusted R², 1 - (1 - 0.735)(59/52) = 0.699, as its R²; R² is 0.735 (models 5 and 6 print R² itself)
R squared: model 7, in the textp. 570
Book 0.699Data 0.735
The book prints model 7's adjusted R², 1 - (1 - 0.735)(59/52) = 0.699, as its R²; R² is 0.735 (models 5 and 6 print R² itself)
Levels of A: the projected designp. 578
Book 8Data 7
A slip: the 31 points the text lists lie at seven levels of A (0, 1/3, 1/2, 3/5, 2/3, 3/4, 1), as the text itself says later
Mean: x4p. 592
Book 96.170Data 96.172
A slip: the column's 14 values average 96.172 (1,346.403/14), as 100 - 1.830 - 1.906 - 0.092 also gives
Range: x4p. 592
Book 1.300Data 2.600
The book prints half the range: its own Min. and Max give 97.500 - 94.900 = 2.600
Ridge path predicted response: Table 19.2, Path A, λ = ∞: ŷp. 605
Book 6.27Data 6.25
Eq. 19.2.4 gives 6.252 at the focus f = (0.21, 0.21, 0.04, 0.44), the fitted value of run 14; every other ŷ of Table 19.2 agrees with the same equation, so the book's 6.27 is a slip for 6.25
Ridge path predicted response: Table 19.2, Path F, λ = −∞: ŷp. 605
Book 6.27Data 6.25
Eq. 19.2.4 gives 6.252 at the focus f = (0.21, 0.21, 0.04, 0.44), the fitted value of run 14; every other ŷ of Table 19.2 agrees with the same equation, so the book's 6.27 is a slip for 6.25
Coefficient: z2·1, y = θz1 + θ2z2·1p. 631
Book 14.34828Data 14.34830
A book slip: the coefficient of z2·1 is θ̂2 of (b), 14.348267, printed there as 14.34827; here 14.34828
Ss residual: y = θ1z1 + θ2z2p. 631
Book 102Data 107
A book error: S_R = 381592 - 374949.97 - 6535.17 = 106.86; the book prints 102, so its rows fall 5 short of its total, which it calls rounding error
Ms residual: y = θ1z1 + θ2z2p. 631
Book 26Data 27
A book error: s² = 106.86/4 = 26.72; the book's 26 is its residual 102 over 4
Ms residual: s², in units of 100 (MS/100)p. 631
Book 0.26Data 0.27
A book error: s²/100 = 106.86/400 = 0.267, giving a bound of 3.71 (371.0 in the units of the printed quadratic form); the book's 0.26 and 3.61 come from its residual 102
Coding: x2, centrep. 633
Book 1760Data 1750
The levels of X2 are 1000 and 2500 lb (Table E4.9), so the centre is 1750; with 1760 the coded levels would be -1.013 and 0.987
Coefficient: b1p. 635
Book -7.506Data 7.506
A sign slip: b1 is +7.506, half the effect 1 <- 15.01 of Exercise 4.9; the runs at 110 rpm average 37.10 and those at 60 rpm 22.09
Ms regression: first orderp. 636
Book 36.485Data 36.458
109.375/3 = 36.458; the printed 36.485 transposes two digits
Curvature contrast: CC, transformed, response 1 (PDA)p. 637
Book -0.101Data -0.104
The book's -101 does not follow from the printed data: the transformed factorial average 0.12150 less arcsin(0.05^½) = 0.22551 gives 1000 x (-0.10401) = -104.0
Effect: transformed, response 3 (PD), 134p. 637
Book 0.031Data -0.031
A lost minus sign: 1000 times the effect is -31.26, and the same effect untransformed is -1.85 (Table A4.16a)
Effect: transformed, response 3 (PD), 1234p. 637
Book 0.057Data -0.057
A lost minus sign: 1000 times the effect is -57.02, and the same effect untransformed is -4.95 (Table A4.16a)
Effect: transformed, response 4 (R), 124p. 637
Book 0.097Data -0.097
A lost minus sign: 1000 times the effect is -96.61, and the same effect untransformed is -8.03 (Table A4.16a)
Effect: transformed, response 4 (R), 134p. 637
Book 0.147Data -0.147
A lost minus sign: 1000 times the effect is -146.99, and the same effect untransformed is -12.55 (Table A4.16a)
Mean: Ip. 643
Book -106.875Data 106.875
The eight responses of Table E5.15 sum to 855, so the average is +106.875; the mean column is minus the 1234 column, which does not change the average's sign, so the minus sign is a misprint
Effect: 3 - 124p. 643
Book 0.26Data 0.25
The runs of Table E5.15 with x3 = +1 total 428 and those with x3 = -1 total 427, so the 3 - 124 estimate is (428 - 427)/4 = 0.25, not 0.26; the other six estimates reproduce
Effect: 2 + 13p. 643
Book 0.625Data -0.625
Over the 16 readings of Table E5.16, x2 = +1 totals 159 and x2 = -1 totals 164, so the 2 + 13 estimate is (159 - 164)/8 = -0.625; the printed 0.625 has lost its sign
Usable members: without renaming the variablesp. 644
Book -134Data -1256, -135, -2345, -456, 124, 1346, 236
-134 is a word of no member of the family I = ±124 = ±135 = ±236; the members that keep 1, 3 and 5 from all being at + have -135, as Ozzie's I = 124 = -135 = 236 (p. 173) does
Variables transferred to the residual: the eight smallest sums of squaresp. 646
Book 13,075Data 19343
With 3, 5, 6, 11, 19, 21, 22 and 24 transferred the residual is 19,343; the eight smallest sums of squares, CP²/28 from the CP row of Table E5.20, are those of 19, 11, 3, 21, 6, 23, 24 and 5 (86 to 1094), and the table printed (129,730 on 15 df, residual 13,075) is for 23 transferred; 22 (SS 7264, named effective on p. 646) is a misprint for 23
Words of length threep. 648
Book 129 + 789Data 129, 359, 469, 789
The relation of I = 1235 = 1246 = 1347 = 2348 = 129 also holds 359 (1235 × 129) and 469 (1246 × 129): four words of length three, 129, 359, 469 and 789, not two
Aliases: 9p. 648
Book 9 + 12 + 78Data 12, 35, 46, 78
9 = 12 = 35 = 46 = 78 in this design, since 359 and 469 are words of its relation, so 9's string also holds 35 and 46
Aliases: 3, 4, 5, 6p. 648
Book all main effects are estimated clear except for those in the combinationsData 59
3 is aliased with 59, from the word 359 (1235 × 129 = 359, 1246 × 129 = 469), so it is not clear
Aliases: 3, 4, 5, 6p. 648
Book all main effects are estimated clear except for those in the combinationsData 69
4 is aliased with 69, from the word 469 (1235 × 129 = 359, 1246 × 129 = 469), so it is not clear
Aliases: 3, 4, 5, 6p. 648
Book all main effects are estimated clear except for those in the combinationsData 39
5 is aliased with 39, from the word 359 (1235 × 129 = 359, 1246 × 129 = 469), so it is not clear
Aliases: 3, 4, 5, 6p. 648
Book all main effects are estimated clear except for those in the combinationsData 49
6 is aliased with 49, from the word 469 (1235 × 129 = 359, 1246 × 129 = 469), so it is not clear
Coefficient: (a), x1p. 651
Book 505.083Data -571.750
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is -571.75; the printed 505.083 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give 505.08
Coefficient: (a), x2p. 651
Book -556.083Data 255.417
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is 255.42; the printed -556.083 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give -556.08
Coefficient: (a), x3p. 651
Book 476.417Data 243.917
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is 243.92; the printed 476.417 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give 476.42
Coefficient: (a), x4p. 651
Book 0.417Data 18.583
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is 18.58; the printed 0.417 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give 0.42
Std error: (a), every coefficientp. 651
Book 51.68Data 259.18
The standard error of the four coefficients is 259.18 in Table 5.7's run order and 136.74 in the order the printed coefficients come from; the printed 51.68 is 136.74/√7, the residual variance divided by its 7 df a second time
Coefficient: (b), x1p. 651
Book 505Data -572
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is -571.75; the printed 505 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give 505.08
Coefficient: (b), x2p. 651
Book -556Data 255
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is 255.42; the printed -556 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give -556.08
Coefficient: (b), x3p. 651
Book 476Data 244
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is 243.92; the printed 476 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give 476.42
Coefficient: (b), x4p. 651
Book 0Data 19
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is 18.58; the printed 0 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give 0.42
Coefficient: (b), x5p. 651
Book 25Data 21
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is 20.92; the printed 25 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give 25.42
Coefficient: (b), x6p. 651
Book 94Data 137
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is 136.58; the printed 94 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give 94.25
Coefficient: (b), x7p. 651
Book 62Data -51
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is -50.75; the printed 62 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give 62.25
Coefficient: (b), x8p. 651
Book 112Data 148
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is 147.92; the printed 112 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give 111.58
Coefficient: (b), x9p. 651
Book 81Data -92
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is -92.08; the printed 81 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give 81.42
Coefficient: (b), x10p. 651
Book -269Data -60
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is -59.75; the printed -269 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give -269.08
Coefficient: (b), x11p. 651
Book 161Data 644
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is 643.92; the printed 161 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give 161.25
Coefficient: (d), x1p. 652
Book 280Data -818
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is -818.17; the printed 280 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give 280.33
Coefficient: (d), x2p. 652
Book -556Data 84
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is 83.67; the printed -556 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give -555.58
Coefficient: (d), x3p. 652
Book 304Data 40
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is 40.33; the printed 304 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give 304.33
Coefficient: (d), x4p. 652
Book -140Data 177
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is 177.33; the printed -140 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give -140.42
Coefficient: (d), x1:x2p. 652
Book -225Data -194
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is -194.33; the printed -225 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give -224.58
Coefficient: (d), x1:x3p. 652
Book -55Data -633
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is -633.42; the printed -55 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give -55.42
Coefficient: (d), x1:x4p. 652
Book -36Data -121
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is -120.92; the printed -36 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give -36.17
Coefficient: (d), x2:x3p. 652
Book -253Data 37
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is 37.17; the printed -253 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give -253.33
Coefficient: (d), x2:x4p. 652
Book -328Data -537
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is -537.33; the printed -328 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give -327.83
Coefficient: (d), x3:x4p. 652
Book 93Data 239
In Table 5.7's printed run order, as the exercise gives the observations, this coefficient is 239.08; the printed 93 reproduces only with observations 2 to 11 on rows 11 to 2 (rows built by moving the first row's signs one place to the left), which give 93.08
Generatorp. 652
Book 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16Data
Every run of Table E5.32 has x1x2x3x4x5 = -1: the fraction is I = -12345, not I = 12345
Resolutionp. 652
Book IVData 5
A 2^(5-1) whose one word, 12345, has five letters is of resolution V, not IV
S²p. 655
Book 5.49Data 5.47
43.775/8 = 5.472, not 5.49; the column sum 43.775, its 8 df and all 16 entries of Table E5.36b reproduce
Nonadditivity ss: S_αp. 659
Book 0.00007Data 0.00003
S_α = 0.00285²/0.2507 = 0.000032 (numpy and the library); the book's 0.00007 uses Σ(q - q̂)² = 0.1366, which is 0.2507 from the q of its own table, and Σ(y - ŷ)q = 0.0030 for 0.00285
Nonadditivity ss: transformation SS (Table 7.6 form)p. 659
Book 0.00007Data 0.00003
S_α = 0.00285²/0.2507 = 0.000032 (numpy and the library); the book's 0.00007 uses Σ(q - q̂)² = 0.1366, which is 0.2507 from the q of its own table, and Σ(y - ŷ)q = 0.0030 for 0.00285
Nonadditivity ms: transformation (one degree of freedom)p. 659
Book 0.00007Data 0.00003
S_α = 0.00285²/0.2507 = 0.000032 (numpy and the library); the book's 0.00007 uses Σ(q - q̂)² = 0.1366, which is 0.2507 from the q of its own table, and Σ(y - ŷ)q = 0.0030 for 0.00285
Nonadditivity f: transformationp. 659
Book 0.01Data 0.00
F = 0.000032/0.007257 = 0.004; the book's 0.01 follows from its S_α = 0.00007, whose Σ(q - q̂)² should be 0.2507
Nonadditivity ss error: adjusted residualp. 659
Book 0.03623Data 0.03628
The adjusted residual is 0.036317 - 0.000032 = 0.03628; the book subtracts its S_α = 0.00007
Nonadditivity ms error: adjusted residualp. 659
Book 0.00725Data 0.00726
0.03628/5 = 0.00726; the book's 0.00725 follows from its S_α = 0.00007
Coefficient: (c), centre of the circle, β2, printed (β2 - 0.2683)²p. 661
Book 0.2683Data -0.2683
B2 = -0.2683, as the book prints it on pp. 657-658, so the circle's centre is β2 = -0.2683 and the term is (β2 + 0.2683)²; the printed minus sign is a slip
Nonadditivity ss: SS(transformation), 1 dfp. 662
Book 83Data 8318
S_α = 8,318 (numpy and the library); the book's 83 is S_α computed for y/10 (83.18), a factor of 100 off
Nonadditivity ss error: SS(adjusted residual)p. 662
Book 76,066Data 67627
The adjusted residual is 75,945 - 8,318 = 67,627; the book's 76,066 is 76,149 - 83, and the second-order residual is 75,945, not 76,149 (the book's own 3^k mean squares sum to 75,943)
Nonadditivity df error: SS(adjusted residual) dfp. 662
Book 17Data 16
The second-order residual has 17 df and the transformation takes one, leaving 16; the book keeps 17
Mean square (z'y)²/z'z: 1p. 662
Book 24,481Data 28481
716²/18 = 28,481; 24,481 is a misprint (the printed root mean square, 169, is the root of 28,481)
Mean square (z'y)²/z'z: 12p. 663
Book 2,607Data 2670
179²/12 = 2,670.1; 2,607 transposes two digits (the printed final column -179 and divisor 12 are right)
Coefficient: b33, second-order modelp. 664
Book 24.28Data -24.28
B33 = -437/18 = -24.28 from the book's own 3^k table, and its b0 = 367.48 needs -24.28; the plus sign is a misprint
Extra f: first orderp. 664
Book 122.0Data 122.9
F = 55,245/449.7 = 122.85; the book's s² = 453 carries its transposed mean square 2,607
Extra ss: second order given b0p. 664
Book 25,275Data 25340
The book adds its mean squares 7,467 + 2,607 + 11,324 + 80 + 261 + 3,536 = 25,275; with 2,670.1 for the transposed 2,607 the second-order SS is 25,339.6
Extra ms: second order given b0p. 664
Book 4,213Data 4223
25,339.6/6 = 4,223.3; the book's 4,213 is its 25,275/6
Extra f: second order given b0p. 664
Book 9.3Data 9.4
4,223.3/449.7 = 9.39; the book's 9.3 is 4,213/453, both carrying the transposed 2,607
Ss residual: residualp. 664
Book 7,709Data 7645
The residual is 7,644.8; the book's 7,709 is the remainder after its 25,275, which adds the transposed 2,607
Ms residual: residualp. 664
Book 453Data 450
7,644.8/17 = 449.7; the book's 453 is 7,709/17
Coefficient: b1, second-order model, all 81 observationsp. 664
Book 131.46Data 177.00
With Table E7.9 as printed (x1 changing fastest) the fit gives b1 = 177.00; the book's equation interchanges x1 and x3, its b1 being the fit's b3
Coefficient: b3, second-order model, all 81 observationsp. 664
Book 177.00Data 131.46
With Table E7.9 as printed (x1 changing fastest) the fit gives b3 = 131.46; the book's equation interchanges x1 and x3, its b3 being the fit's b1
Coefficient: b12, second-order model, all 81 observationsp. 664
Book 43.58Data 66.03
With Table E7.9 as printed (x1 changing fastest) the fit gives b12 = 66.03; the book's equation interchanges x1 and x3, its b12 being the fit's b23
Coefficient: b23, second-order model, all 81 observationsp. 664
Book 66.03Data 43.58
With Table E7.9 as printed (x1 changing fastest) the fit gives b23 = 43.58; the book's equation interchanges x1 and x3, its b23 being the fit's b12
Extra ss: second-order terms given b0p. 664
Book 471,778Data 473039
The second-order SS is 473,039; the book's rows add to 3,271,619 + 471,778 + 295,990 + 244,025 = 4,283,412, 764 short of its own total 4,284,176, so 471,778 is a slip
R squared: second-order modelp. 664
Book 0.8738Data 0.8741
(3,271,619 + 473,039)/4,284,176 = 0.8741; the book's 0.8738 uses its 471,778
Lack of fit ss: lack of fitp. 664
Book 295,990Data 295493
The lack of fit is 539,518 - 244,025 = 295,493; the book's rows do not add to its total (764 short)
Anova sum sq: b11 given b0p. 665
Book 23,053.87Data 23053.40
SS(b11 | b0) = 23,053.36 (numpy and the library); the book's partition slips, though its rows still add to the corrected total 32,408.3
Anova mean sq: b11 given b0p. 665
Book 23,053.87Data 23053.40
The mean square on 1 df is 23,053.36; the book's partition slips, though its rows still add to the corrected total 32,408.3
Anova f: b11 given b0p. 665
Book 102.97Data 103.05
F = 23,053.36/223.72 = 103.05; the book's uses its 23,053.87 and 223.90; the book's partition slips, though its rows still add to the corrected total 32,408.3
Anova sum sq: b22 given b0p. 665
Book 5,827.03Data 5826.78
SS(b22 | b0) = 5,826.78 (numpy and the library); the book's partition slips, though its rows still add to the corrected total 32,408.3
Anova mean sq: b22 given b0p. 665
Book 5,827.03Data 5826.78
The mean square on 1 df is 5,826.78; the book's partition slips, though its rows still add to the corrected total 32,408.3
Anova f: b22 given b0p. 665
Book 26.03Data 26.05
F = 5,826.78/223.72 = 26.05; the book's partition slips, though its rows still add to the corrected total 32,408.3
Anova sum sq: b12p. 665
Book 403.13Data 406.12
SS(b12) = 57²/8 = 406.125 exactly (Σx1x2y = 57); the book's partition slips, though its rows still add to the corrected total 32,408.3
Anova mean sq: b12p. 665
Book 403.13Data 406.12
The mean square on 1 df is 57²/8 = 406.125; the book's partition slips, though its rows still add to the corrected total 32,408.3
Anova f: b12p. 665
Book 1.80Data 1.82
F = 406.125/223.72 = 1.82; the book's partition slips, though its rows still add to the corrected total 32,408.3
Ss residual: residualp. 665
Book 2,686.84Data 2684.60
The residual is 2,684.60; the book's partition slips, though its rows still add to the corrected total 32,408.3
Ms residual: residualp. 665
Book 223.90Data 223.72
S² = 2,684.60/12 = 223.72; the book's partition slips, though its rows still add to the corrected total 32,408.3
Lack of fit ss: lack of fitp. 665
Book 1,085.34Data 1083.10
The lack of fit is 2,684.60 - 1,601.50 = 1,083.10; the book's partition slips, though its rows still add to the corrected total 32,408.3
Lack of fit ms: lack of fitp. 665
Book 361.72Data 361.03
1,083.10/3 = 361.03; the book's partition slips, though its rows still add to the corrected total 32,408.3
Coefficient: b0, (c), second-order modelp. 665
Book 7.5Data 43.5
B0 = 43.5, the mean of the four centre runs; 7.5 is a misprint
Extra f: first orderp. 666
Book 13.53Data 11.26
The twelve observations give Σy² = 16,651, not the book's 16,639.00, so s² = 11.912 and F = 134.08/11.912 = 11.26; the book's 13.53 uses s² = 9.912
Extra f: second order given b0p. 666
Book 18.25Data 15.18
The twelve observations give Σy² = 16,651, not the book's 16,639.00, so s² = 11.912 and F = 180.88/11.912 = 15.18
Lack of fit ss: lack of fitp. 666
Book 42.47Data 54.47
The twelve observations give Σy² = 16,651, not the book's 16,639.00, so the lack of fit, which the book works as a remainder, is 54.47
Lack of fit ms: lack of fitp. 666
Book 14.16Data 18.16
The twelve observations give Σy² = 16,651, not the book's 16,639.00, so the lack-of-fit MS is 54.47/3 = 18.16
Lack of fit f: lack of fitp. 666
Book 2.50Data 3.20
The twelve observations give Σy² = 16,651, not the book's 16,639.00, so F = 18.16/5.667 = 3.20, still below F(3, 3, 0.95) = 9.28
Ss total uncorrected: totalp. 666
Book 16,639.00Data 16651.00
The twelve observations give Σy² = 16,651; the book's 16,639.00 is 12 short (its part (d) total, 40,331, agrees with 16,651), and its lack of fit, worked as a remainder, inherits the slip
Ms residual: residualp. 666
Book 9.912Data 11.912
The twelve observations give Σy² = 16,651, not the book's 16,639.00, so s² = (54.47 + 17.00)/6 = 11.912
Lack of fit f: first-order modelp. 666
Book 17.20Data 17.56
The twelve observations give Σy² = 16,651, not the book's 16,639.00, so F = {(542.63 + 54.47)/6}/5.667 = 17.56; the book also divides by 5.67 rounded
Lack of fit ss: first-order modelp. 666
Book 542.63 + 42.47Data 597.099
The twelve observations give Σy² = 16,651, not the book's 16,639.00, so the first-order model's lack of fit is 542.63 + 54.47 = 597.10
Extra f: nine points: b1, b2p. 668
Book 691.9Data 69.2
F = 81.42/1.176 = 69.24 (the book's own rows give 81.42/1.177 = 69.19); 691.9 misplaces the decimal point
Coefficient: b22, second-order model, all 12 observationsp. 668
Book -16.30Data -16.29
B22 = -16.289 (numpy agrees), which rounds to -16.29; the book's -16.30 is a slip
Coefficient: b12, second-order model, all 12 observationsp. 668
Book -6.00Data 6.00
B12 = (130 - 121 - 110 + 125)/4 = +6.00, and the book's own centre (0.067, -0.051) needs +6 (with -6 it is (0.092, -0.080)); the minus sign is a misprint
Extra ss: b1, b2p. 668
Book 87.90Data 87.91
The first-order SS is 21²/8.5 + 17.5²/8.5 = 87.91; the book's 87.90 is a slip
Extra ms: b1, b2p. 668
Book 43.95Data 43.96
87.91/2 = 43.96; the book's 43.95 halves its 87.90
Extra f: b1, b2p. 668
Book 2.24Data 2.23
The twelve observations give the corrected total Σy² - (Σy)²/12 = 199,887 - 196,352.08 = 3,534.92, not the book's 3,534.19, so s² = 19.728 and F = 43.96/19.728 = 2.23
Extra ss: b11, b22, b12 given b0p. 668
Book 3328.62Data 3328.64
The second-order SS is 3,328.64; the book's 3,328.62 is a slip
Extra f: b11, b22, b12 given b0p. 668
Book 56.57Data 56.24
The twelve observations give the corrected total Σy² - (Σy)²/12 = 199,887 - 196,352.08 = 3,534.92, not the book's 3,534.19, so F = 1,109.55/19.728 = 56.24
Lack of fit ss: lack of fitp. 668
Book 100.67Data 101.37
The twelve observations give the corrected total Σy² - (Σy)²/12 = 199,887 - 196,352.08 = 3,534.92, not the book's 3,534.19, so the lack of fit, a remainder, is 101.37
Lack of fit ms: lack of fitp. 668
Book 33.557Data 33.790
The twelve observations give the corrected total Σy² - (Σy)²/12 = 199,887 - 196,352.08 = 3,534.92, not the book's 3,534.19, so the lack-of-fit MS is 101.37/3 = 33.79
Lack of fit f: lack of fitp. 668
Book 5.92Data 5.96
The twelve observations give the corrected total Σy² - (Σy)²/12 = 199,887 - 196,352.08 = 3,534.92, not the book's 3,534.19, so F = 33.79/5.667 = 5.96
Ss total: total, correctedp. 668
Book 3534.19Data 3534.92
199,887 - 196,352.08 = 3,534.92; 3,534.19 transposes the last two digits
Ss residual: residualp. 668
Book 117.67Data 118.37
The twelve observations give the corrected total Σy² - (Σy)²/12 = 199,887 - 196,352.08 = 3,534.92, not the book's 3,534.19, so the residual is 101.37 + 17.00 = 118.37
Ms residual: residualp. 668
Book 19.612Data 19.728
The twelve observations give the corrected total Σy² - (Σy)²/12 = 199,887 - 196,352.08 = 3,534.92, not the book's 3,534.19, so s² = 118.37/6 = 19.728
Ms residual: s²p. 669
Book 19.612Data 19.728
The twelve observations give the corrected total Σy² - (Σy)²/12 = 199,887 - 196,352.08 = 3,534.92, not the book's 3,534.19, so s² = 118.37/6 = 19.728
Ratio: (ŷmax - ŷmin)/(ps²/n)^1/2p. 669
Book 13.70Data 13.65
The book's s² = 19.612 rests on a corrected total of 3,534.19, where the twelve observations give 3,534.92 and s² = 19.728 (see s² above); with it, and the fitted values 150.836 and 107.950, the ratio is 13.65; the book's own numbers give (150.84 - 107.94)/{6(19.612)/12}^1/2 = 13.70
Significance at 5%: lack of fit, all 20 readingsp. 669
Book < 0.05Data 0.78107
With all 20 readings the lack of fit F is (212.5/3)/(2,147.0/11) = 0.36, p = 0.78 (numpy and the library): no lack of fit is exhibited, contrary to the book
Coefficient: b0, reduced first-order modelp. 672
Book 15.8Data 15.7
The first-order intercept is ȳ = 376.8/24 = 15.70; the book repeats the full model's 15.8
Ss residual: first-order modelp. 672
Book 12.359Data 12.328
The first-order SS is (12.6² + 22.2² + 91.4²)/24 = 375.232 (b1, b2, b3 = 0.525, 0.925, 3.8083 as printed), 0.031 more than the book's 375.201, and the book's remainders inherit the slip: the first-order residual is 387.560 - 375.232 = 12.328
Ms residual: first-order modelp. 672
Book 0.61795Data 0.61642
The first-order SS is (12.6² + 22.2² + 91.4²)/24 = 375.232 (b1, b2, b3 = 0.525, 0.925, 3.8083 as printed), 0.031 more than the book's 375.201, and the book's remainders inherit the slip: 12.328/20 = 0.6164
Σxi²: each x over the 24 observationsp. 672
Book 16Data 24
Over the 24 observations Σxi² = 8 + 16 = 24, each axial point being run twice; the book's 16 counts each axial point once
Σxi²: each x over the 24 observationsp. 672
Book 16Data 24
Over the 24 observations Σxi² = 8 + 16 = 24, each axial point being run twice; the book's 16 counts each axial point once
Σxi²: each x over the 24 observationsp. 672
Book 16Data 24
Over the 24 observations Σxi² = 8 + 16 = 24, each axial point being run twice; the book's 16 counts each axial point once
Std error: first-order model, b1p. 672
Book 0.20Data 0.16
Se = (0.6164/24)^1/2 = 0.16; the book's 0.20 uses Σxi² = 16 (24 over the 24 observations)
Std error: first-order model, b2p. 672
Book 0.20Data 0.16
Se = (0.6164/24)^1/2 = 0.16; the book's 0.20 uses Σxi² = 16 (24 over the 24 observations)
Std error: first-order model, b3p. 672
Book 0.20Data 0.16
Se = (0.6164/24)^1/2 = 0.16; the book's 0.20 uses Σxi² = 16 (24 over the 24 observations)
Extra ss: first orderp. 672
Book 375.201Data 375.232
The first-order SS is (12.6² + 22.2² + 91.4²)/24 = 375.232 (b1, b2, b3 = 0.525, 0.925, 3.8083 as printed), 0.031 more than the book's 375.201, and the book's remainders inherit the slip: 375.232
Extra ms: first orderp. 672
Book 125.067Data 125.077
The first-order SS is (12.6² + 22.2² + 91.4²)/24 = 375.232 (b1, b2, b3 = 0.525, 0.925, 3.8083 as printed), 0.031 more than the book's 375.201, and the book's remainders inherit the slip: MS = 375.232/3 = 125.077
Extra f: first orderp. 672
Book 302.09Data 303.31
The first-order SS is (12.6² + 22.2² + 91.4²)/24 = 375.232 (b1, b2, b3 = 0.525, 0.925, 3.8083 as printed), 0.031 more than the book's 375.201, and the book's remainders inherit the slip: F = 125.077/0.4124 = 303.3
Extra ss: second order given b0p. 672
Book 6.558Data 6.555
The first-order SS is (12.6² + 22.2² + 91.4²)/24 = 375.232 (b1, b2, b3 = 0.525, 0.925, 3.8083 as printed), 0.031 more than the book's 375.201, and the book's remainders inherit the slip: the second-order SS is 6.555
Extra f: second order given b0p. 672
Book 2.64Data 2.65
The first-order SS is (12.6² + 22.2² + 91.4²)/24 = 375.232 (b1, b2, b3 = 0.525, 0.925, 3.8083 as printed), 0.031 more than the book's 375.201, and the book's remainders inherit the slip: F = 1.0925/0.4124 = 2.65
Lack of fit ss: lack of fitp. 672
Book 3.308Data 3.281
The first-order SS is (12.6² + 22.2² + 91.4²)/24 = 375.232 (b1, b2, b3 = 0.525, 0.925, 3.8083 as printed), 0.031 more than the book's 375.201, and the book's remainders inherit the slip: lack of fit 3.281
Lack of fit ms: lack of fitp. 672
Book 0.661Data 0.656
The first-order SS is (12.6² + 22.2² + 91.4²)/24 = 375.232 (b1, b2, b3 = 0.525, 0.925, 3.8083 as printed), 0.031 more than the book's 375.201, and the book's remainders inherit the slip: 3.281/5 = 0.656
Lack of fit f: lack of fitp. 672
Book 2.39Data 2.37
The first-order SS is (12.6² + 22.2² + 91.4²)/24 = 375.232 (b1, b2, b3 = 0.525, 0.925, 3.8083 as printed), 0.031 more than the book's 375.201, and the book's remainders inherit the slip: F = 0.656/0.277 = 2.37
Ms residual: residualp. 673
Book 0.414Data 0.412
The first-order SS is (12.6² + 22.2² + 91.4²)/24 = 375.232 (b1, b2, b3 = 0.525, 0.925, 3.8083 as printed), 0.031 more than the book's 375.201, and the book's remainders inherit the slip: s² = (3.281 + 2.493)/14 = 0.4124
Extra ss: second order given b0, blocks (x 10^3)p. 674
Book 292.4e-3Data 0.268884
The book's own fitted equation (its 16 coefficients agree with the fit) has ten second-order terms; with them numpy and the library give second order 268.9 (x 10^-3)
Df: second order given b0, blocks (x 10^3)p. 674
Book 7Data 10
The book's own fitted equation (its 16 coefficients agree with the fit) has ten second-order terms; with them numpy and the library give 10 df for the second-order terms, as Table E7.26b prints
Extra ms: second order given b0, blocks (x 10^3)p. 674
Book 41.77e-3Data 0.0268884
The book's own fitted equation (its 16 coefficients agree with the fit) has ten second-order terms; with them numpy and the library give 268.9/10 = 26.89 (x 10^-3)
Lack of fit ss: (SS and MS x 10^3)p. 674
Book 43.6e-3Data 0.0670697
The book's own fitted equation (its 16 coefficients agree with the fit) has ten second-order terms; with them numpy and the library give lack of fit 67.07 (x 10^-3); the book's 292.4 and 43.6 add to the same 336.0
Lack of fit dfp. 674
Book 12Data 9
The book's own fitted equation (its 16 coefficients agree with the fit) has ten second-order terms; with them numpy and the library give 28 - 16 - 3 = 9 lack-of-fit df, as Table E7.26b prints
Lack of fit ms: (SS and MS x 10^3)p. 674
Book 3.63e-3Data 0.00745219
The book's own fitted equation (its 16 coefficients agree with the fit) has ten second-order terms; with them numpy and the library give 67.07/9 = 7.452 (x 10^-3)
Lack of fit fp. 674
Book 22.85Data 46.87
The book's own fitted equation (its 16 coefficients agree with the fit) has ten second-order terms; with them numpy and the library give F = 7.452/0.159 = 46.9
Coefficient: b11, ŷ6, second-order modelp. 675
Book 43.81Data 43.84
The fit gives 43.84 (numpy agrees); the book's 43.81 is a slip (the other 82 coefficients and every significance mark agree, so the data are as printed)
Coefficient: b22, ŷ6, second-order modelp. 675
Book 113.3Data 111.3
The fit gives 111.34 (numpy agrees); 113.3 is likely a misprint of 111.3
Coefficient: b0, ŷ6, cubic model with blocksp. 677
Book 15.29Data 14.71
Table E7.28 prints y6 = 20.0 for run 2; the book's y6 answer is the fit with 28.0 (numpy: one change of +8.0 at run 2 reproduces all twelve printed y6 coefficients to 0.006); with 20.0 the fit gives 14.714
Coefficient: b1, ŷ6, cubic model with blocksp. 677
Book -0.60Data 0.74
Table E7.28 prints y6 = 20.0 for run 2; the book's y6 answer is the fit with 28.0 (numpy: one change of +8.0 at run 2 reproduces all twelve printed y6 coefficients to 0.006); with 20.0 the fit gives 0.737
Coefficient: b2, ŷ6, cubic model with blocksp. 677
Book -2.21Data -3.54
Table E7.28 prints y6 = 20.0 for run 2; the book's y6 answer is the fit with 28.0 (numpy: one change of +8.0 at run 2 reproduces all twelve printed y6 coefficients to 0.006); with 20.0 the fit gives -3.545
Coefficient: b11, ŷ6, cubic model with blocksp. 677
Book 0.97Data 0.47
Table E7.28 prints y6 = 20.0 for run 2; the book's y6 answer is the fit with 28.0 (numpy: one change of +8.0 at run 2 reproduces all twelve printed y6 coefficients to 0.006); with 20.0 the fit gives 0.469
Coefficient: b22, ŷ6, cubic model with blocksp. 677
Book 5.28Data 4.78
Table E7.28 prints y6 = 20.0 for run 2; the book's y6 answer is the fit with 28.0 (numpy: one change of +8.0 at run 2 reproduces all twelve printed y6 coefficients to 0.006); with 20.0 the fit gives 4.781
Coefficient: b12, ŷ6, cubic model with blocksp. 677
Book 1.19Data 2.74
Table E7.28 prints y6 = 20.0 for run 2; the book's y6 answer is the fit with 28.0 (numpy: one change of +8.0 at run 2 reproduces all twelve printed y6 coefficients to 0.006); with 20.0 the fit gives 2.741
Coefficient: b111, ŷ6, cubic model with blocksp. 677
Book 0.29Data -0.45
Table E7.28 prints y6 = 20.0 for run 2; the book's y6 answer is the fit with 28.0 (numpy: one change of +8.0 at run 2 reproduces all twelve printed y6 coefficients to 0.006); with 20.0 the fit gives -0.448
Coefficient: b222, ŷ6, cubic model with blocksp. 677
Book -3.93Data -3.19
Table E7.28 prints y6 = 20.0 for run 2; the book's y6 answer is the fit with 28.0 (numpy: one change of +8.0 at run 2 reproduces all twelve printed y6 coefficients to 0.006); with 20.0 the fit gives -3.187
Coefficient: b112, ŷ6, cubic model with blocksp. 677
Book -1.63Data 0.83
Table E7.28 prints y6 = 20.0 for run 2; the book's y6 answer is the fit with 28.0 (numpy: one change of +8.0 at run 2 reproduces all twelve printed y6 coefficients to 0.006); with 20.0 the fit gives 0.825
Coefficient: b122, ŷ6, cubic model with blocksp. 677
Book -0.10Data -2.56
Table E7.28 prints y6 = 20.0 for run 2; the book's y6 answer is the fit with 28.0 (numpy: one change of +8.0 at run 2 reproduces all twelve printed y6 coefficients to 0.006); with 20.0 the fit gives -2.556
Coefficient: a1, ŷ6, cubic model with blocksp. 677
Book 0.93Data 2.07
Table E7.28 prints y6 = 20.0 for run 2; the book's y6 answer is the fit with 28.0 (numpy: one change of +8.0 at run 2 reproduces all twelve printed y6 coefficients to 0.006); with 20.0 the fit gives 2.071
Coefficient: a2, ŷ6, cubic model with blocksp. 677
Book -0.07Data 1.07
Table E7.28 prints y6 = 20.0 for run 2; the book's y6 answer is the fit with 28.0 (numpy: one change of +8.0 at run 2 reproduces all twelve printed y6 coefficients to 0.006); with 20.0 the fit gives 1.071
Lack of fit f: first-order model with blocks, y6, marked bp. 678
Book 110.8Data 119.2
With run 2's y6 at 28.0 numpy gives F = 110.79, as printed; with the 20.0 of Table E7.28, F = 119.2
Lack of fit f: second-order model with blocks, y6, marked bp. 678
Book 21.4Data 36.8
With run 2's y6 at 28.0 numpy gives F = 21.42, as printed; with the 20.0 of Table E7.28, F = 36.8
Lack of fit f: third-order model with blocks, y6p. 678
Book 5.3Data 9.7
With run 2's y6 at 28.0 numpy gives F = 5.29, as printed; with the 20.0 of Table E7.28, F = 9.69
Lack of fit f: third-order model with blocks, y6p. 678
Book > 0.05Data 0.0235466
With the 20.0 of Table E7.28 the third-order lack of fit is significant (p = 0.024); with run 2's y6 at 28.0, F = 5.29 is not, as the book marks it
Ms residual: y2: s2^2p. 679
Book 0.0049Data 0.0048
S2^2 = 0.04797/10 = 0.0048, as the book's own rows give, (0.026 + 0.022)/10; it prints 0.0049
Coefficient: x1:x3p. 679
Book -0.1112Data -0.0471
The x1x3 coefficient of ln y is -0.0471; the book repeats the x1x2 coefficient -0.1112, and its own stationary point (0.693, 0.404, 0.472) needs -0.0471 and -0.0161
Coefficient: x2:x3p. 679
Book -0.1112Data -0.0161
The x2x3 coefficient of ln y is -0.0161; the book repeats the x1x2 coefficient -0.1112, and its own stationary point (0.693, 0.404, 0.472) needs -0.0471 and -0.0161
Std error: b12, b13, b23, s from pure errorp. 680
Book 0.301Data 0.395
With the pure-error s = 1.118 the se is 1.118/8^1/2 = 0.395; the book's 0.301 is 1.273 x 1.118/4.723, but 1.273 comes from the 6 df residual of the plane plus interactions (s = 3.601), not from s = 4.723 (which gives 1.670)
Mean: y-bar_0, the 5 centre runsp. 680
Book 28.2Data 28.5
The five centre runs (29.0, 28.5, 30.0, 27.0, 28.0) average 28.5, as the answer's pure error 5.00 and intercept 29.731 require; the book prints 28.2
Curvature: c = y-bar_f - y-bar_0p. 680
Book 2.3Data 2.0
C = 30.5 - 28.5 = 2.0; the book's 2.3 uses its misprinted centre average 28.2
T value: c over its standard errorp. 680
Book 3.61Data 3.14
C/se = 2.0/0.637 = 3.14; the book's 3.61 is 2.3/0.637, from its misprinted centre average 28.2
Ss total: correctedp. 681
Book 4760.11Data 4750.11
The total corrected SS is 4750.105: the printed rows add to 4750.11, and the answer's 62% needs it; 4760.11 is a misprint
Ss residualp. 682
Book 0.2888915Data 0.2889150
Book misprint: the table's total 9.404509 less its other rows (6.572814, 1.688804, 0.853976) is 0.288915, as the fit gives; the printed 0.2888915 has an extra digit.
Stationary point: (c) x2p. 683
Book 0.515Data 51.500
Book slip: the exercise (p. 367) prints 206x1; the answer's centre (0.2125, 0.515) and ŷS = 75.43775 are those of 2.06x1 (x2S = 2.06/4, ŷS = 75 + 0.43775). With 206x1 as printed the library gives 51.5.
Stationary point: (c) predictedp. 683
Book 75.43775Data 118.77500
Book slip: the exercise (p. 367) prints 206x1; the answer's centre (0.2125, 0.515) and ŷS = 75.43775 are those of 2.06x1 (x2S = 2.06/4, ŷS = 75 + 0.43775). With 206x1 as printed the library gives 118.775.
Coefficient: Y1: b1p. 684
Book 15.493Data 16.494
Book misprint: the fit gives 16.4936, and the answer's own SS(bi) = 9,476.2 needs b1 = 16.49; the printed 15.493 has a wrong first digit.
Coefficient: Y3: b2p. 684
Book 31.4Data -31.4
Book sign error: the fit gives -31.3964, and the answer's own xS = (14.85, -2.17, -18.72) needs b2 = -31.4.
Lack of fit ss: Y3, 5 dfp. 684
Book 1,442.7Data 1422.7
Book misprint: the fit gives 1422.68; with 1,422.7 the four rows sum to the printed total 228,175.0, with the printed 1,442.7 to 228,195.0.
Stationary point: problem 3: x1p. 684
Book 0.901Data 0.910
Book misprint: -½B⁻¹b = (0.9103, 0.7410) for problem 3; the printed 0.901 transposes the digits of 0.910.
Eigenvalue: λ1p. 689
Book -5.520Data -5.521
Book slip: the reduced equation as printed (and the fit) gives eigenvalues -5.5211 and -14.9501, which sum to the trace b11 + b22 = -20.4712; the printed -5.520 and -14.948 sum to -20.468.
Eigenvalue: λ2p. 689
Book -14.948Data -14.950
Book slip: the reduced equation as printed (and the fit) gives eigenvalues -5.5211 and -14.9501, which sum to the trace b11 + b22 = -20.4712; the printed -5.520 and -14.948 sum to -20.468.
Eigenvector: m3, x2p. 691
Book 0.357Data 0.359
Book slip: the fit and the printed equation both give 0.358737 (0.359); the answer prints 0.357.
Eigenvector: m3, x3p. 697
Book -0.3421Data -0.3214
Book misprint: the equation as printed gives -0.321376; the printed -0.3421 transposes the digits of -0.3214 (the column then has unit length).
Lack of fit ss: y1: lofp. 698
Book 4.27Data 3.87
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. Without them y1's pure error is 0.674 (the printed 0.67); with them 3.86976.
Lack of fit df: y1: lofp. 698
Book 15Data 14
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. Without them y1's pure error is 0.674 (the printed 0.67); with them 14.
Lack of fit ms: y1: lofp. 698
Book 0.285Data 0.276
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. Without them y1's pure error is 0.674 (the printed 0.67); with them 0.276411.
Lack of fit f: y1: lofp. 698
Book 2.12Data 1.54
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. Without them y1's pure error is 0.674 (the printed 0.67); with them 1.5368.
Pure error ss: y1: pep. 698
Book 0.67Data 1.08
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. Without them y1's pure error is 0.674 (the printed 0.67); with them 1.07917.
Pure error df: y1: pep. 698
Book 5Data 6
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. Without them y1's pure error is 0.674 (the printed 0.67); with them 6.
Pure error ms: y1: pep. 698
Book 0.134Data 0.180
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. Without them y1's pure error is 0.674 (the printed 0.67); with them 0.179861.
Ratio: y1: (ŷmax - ŷmin)/(ps²/n)^1/2p. 698
Book 22.84Data 22.06
The book takes p = 14, (9.61 - 2.43)/{14(0.247)/35}^1/2 = 22.84; the second-order model in four factors has 15 coefficients (35 runs less the 20 residual df), and with p = 15 the fit gives 22.06
Stationary point: y1: x1p. 698
Book -1.43Data -1.38
Book slip: the printed canonical form does not come from the answer's own B (its λ's sum to -0.68, the printed B's trace is -0.512); the fit, whose B agrees with the printed one, gives xS = (-1.378, 3.244, 6.511, 1.595), ŷS = 10.218 and λ = (-0.401, -0.068, -0.025, -0.016). Found -1.37829.
Stationary point: y1: x2p. 698
Book 2.67Data 3.24
Book slip: the printed canonical form does not come from the answer's own B (its λ's sum to -0.68, the printed B's trace is -0.512); the fit, whose B agrees with the printed one, gives xS = (-1.378, 3.244, 6.511, 1.595), ŷS = 10.218 and λ = (-0.401, -0.068, -0.025, -0.016). Found 3.24354.
Stationary point: y1: x3p. 698
Book 0.60Data 6.51
Book slip: the printed canonical form does not come from the answer's own B (its λ's sum to -0.68, the printed B's trace is -0.512); the fit, whose B agrees with the printed one, gives xS = (-1.378, 3.244, 6.511, 1.595), ŷS = 10.218 and λ = (-0.401, -0.068, -0.025, -0.016). Found 6.51115.
Stationary point: y1: x4p. 698
Book 2.40Data 1.59
Book slip: the printed canonical form does not come from the answer's own B (its λ's sum to -0.68, the printed B's trace is -0.512); the fit, whose B agrees with the printed one, gives xS = (-1.378, 3.244, 6.511, 1.595), ŷS = 10.218 and λ = (-0.401, -0.068, -0.025, -0.016). Found 1.59454.
Stationary point: y1: predictedp. 698
Book 9.55Data 10.22
Book slip: the printed canonical form does not come from the answer's own B (its λ's sum to -0.68, the printed B's trace is -0.512); the fit, whose B agrees with the printed one, gives xS = (-1.378, 3.244, 6.511, 1.595), ŷS = 10.218 and λ = (-0.401, -0.068, -0.025, -0.016). Found 10.2184.
Eigenvalue: y1: λ2p. 698
Book -0.19Data -0.07
Book slip: the printed canonical form does not come from the answer's own B (its λ's sum to -0.68, the printed B's trace is -0.512); the fit, whose B agrees with the printed one, gives xS = (-1.378, 3.244, 6.511, 1.595), ŷS = 10.218 and λ = (-0.401, -0.068, -0.025, -0.016). Found -0.0683511.
Lack of fit ss: y2, with run 16: lofp. 699
Book 189.34Data 188.97
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. y2's printed 1.22 matches neither 1.19 without them nor 1.595 with them; found 188.969.
Lack of fit df: y2, with run 16: lofp. 699
Book 15Data 14
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. y2's printed 1.22 matches neither 1.19 without them nor 1.595 with them; found 14.
Lack of fit ms: y2, with run 16: lofp. 699
Book 12.623Data 13.498
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. y2's printed 1.22 matches neither 1.19 without them nor 1.595 with them; found 13.4978.
Lack of fit f: y2, with run 16: lofp. 699
Book 51.73Data 50.78
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. y2's printed 1.22 matches neither 1.19 without them nor 1.595 with them; found 50.7753.
Pure error ss: y2, with run 16: pep. 699
Book 1.22Data 1.59
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. y2's printed 1.22 matches neither 1.19 without them nor 1.595 with them; found 1.595.
Pure error df: y2, with run 16: pep. 699
Book 5Data 6
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. y2's printed 1.22 matches neither 1.19 without them nor 1.595 with them; found 6.
Pure error ms: y2, with run 16: pep. 699
Book 0.244Data 0.266
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. y2's printed 1.22 matches neither 1.19 without them nor 1.595 with them; found 0.265833.
Lack of fit ss: y2, without run 16: lofp. 699
Book 15.54Data 15.16
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. y2's printed 1.22 matches neither 1.19 without them nor 1.595 with them; found 15.1649.
Lack of fit df: y2, without run 16: lofp. 699
Book 14Data 13
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. y2's printed 1.22 matches neither 1.19 without them nor 1.595 with them; found 13.
Lack of fit ms: y2, without run 16: lofp. 699
Book 1.110Data 1.167
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. y2's printed 1.22 matches neither 1.19 without them nor 1.595 with them; found 1.16653.
Lack of fit f: y2, without run 16: lofp. 699
Book 4.55Data 4.39
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. y2's printed 1.22 matches neither 1.19 without them nor 1.595 with them; found 4.38821.
Pure error ss: y2, without run 16: pep. 699
Book 1.22Data 1.59
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. y2's printed 1.22 matches neither 1.19 without them nor 1.595 with them; found 1.595.
Pure error df: y2, without run 16: pep. 699
Book 5Data 6
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. y2's printed 1.22 matches neither 1.19 without them nor 1.595 with them; found 6.
Pure error ms: y2, without run 16: pep. 699
Book 0.244Data 0.266
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. y2's printed 1.22 matches neither 1.19 without them nor 1.595 with them; found 0.265833.
Lack of fit df: y3: lofp. 700
Book 15Data 14
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. For y3 the printed 0.060 is the 6-df value (0.04 without runs 33 and 34), set against 5 df; found 14.
Lack of fit ms: y3: lofp. 700
Book 0.0528Data 0.0566
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. For y3 the printed 0.060 is the 6-df value (0.04 without runs 33 and 34), set against 5 df; found 0.0565858.
Lack of fit f: y3: lofp. 700
Book 4.40Data 5.66
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. For y3 the printed 0.060 is the 6-df value (0.04 without runs 33 and 34), set against 5 df; found 5.65858.
Pure error df: y3: pep. 700
Book 5Data 6
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. For y3 the printed 0.060 is the 6-df value (0.04 without runs 33 and 34), set against 5 df; found 6.
Pure error ms: y3: pep. 700
Book 0.017Data 0.010
Book slip: the answer's pure error has 5 df, leaving out runs 33 and 34, which Table E11.17 prints at the same settings (1.3, -1, 2, 2); with them the library takes 6 df. The printed MS 0.017 is a misprint for 0.012 = 0.060/5, the value its F of 4.40 uses; the library gives 0.060/6 = 0.01.
Stationary point: predictedp. 700
Book 8.20Data 1.80
Book slip: the answer's own printed equation and xS give ŷS = b0 + ½xS'b = 1.79906 (the fit 1.80); the printed 8.20 does not follow.
Eigenvalue: λ4p. 702
Book 0.00000Data -0.00786
Klein and Marshall's reduction as the book reprints it is wrong in its last two axes: the authors' equation gives the eigenvalues -0.13168, -0.11121, 0.01996, -0.01282 and -0.00786 (the last two sum to the printed -0.02069, but are not 0 and -0.02069), and the printed rows 4 and 5 of M' are not orthogonal (their product is 0.89). Found -0.00785805.
Eigenvalue: λ5p. 702
Book -0.02069Data -0.01282
Klein and Marshall's reduction as the book reprints it is wrong in its last two axes: the authors' equation gives the eigenvalues -0.13168, -0.11121, 0.01996, -0.01282 and -0.00786 (the last two sum to the printed -0.02069, but are not 0 and -0.02069), and the printed rows 4 and 5 of M' are not orthogonal (their product is 0.89). Found -0.0128243.
Eigenvector: m2, x5p. 702
Book 0.12784Data -0.12780
Book sign error: with the other four elements of row 2 as printed, the authors' equation gives -0.127802.
Eigenvector: m4, x1p. 702
Book 0.53409Data 0.68581
Klein and Marshall's reduction as the book reprints it is wrong in its last two axes: the authors' equation gives the eigenvalues -0.13168, -0.11121, 0.01996, -0.01282 and -0.00786 (the last two sum to the printed -0.02069, but are not 0 and -0.02069), and the printed rows 4 and 5 of M' are not orthogonal (their product is 0.89). Found 0.685806.
Eigenvector: m4, x2p. 702
Book -0.11307Data 0.08723
Klein and Marshall's reduction as the book reprints it is wrong in its last two axes: the authors' equation gives the eigenvalues -0.13168, -0.11121, 0.01996, -0.01282 and -0.00786 (the last two sum to the printed -0.02069, but are not 0 and -0.02069), and the printed rows 4 and 5 of M' are not orthogonal (their product is 0.89). Found 0.0872308.
Eigenvector: m4, x3p. 702
Book 0.07621Data -0.48047
Klein and Marshall's reduction as the book reprints it is wrong in its last two axes: the authors' equation gives the eigenvalues -0.13168, -0.11121, 0.01996, -0.01282 and -0.00786 (the last two sum to the printed -0.02069, but are not 0 and -0.02069), and the printed rows 4 and 5 of M' are not orthogonal (their product is 0.89). Found -0.48047.
Eigenvector: m4, x4p. 702
Book 0.20054Data -0.08525
Klein and Marshall's reduction as the book reprints it is wrong in its last two axes: the authors' equation gives the eigenvalues -0.13168, -0.11121, 0.01996, -0.01282 and -0.00786 (the last two sum to the printed -0.02069, but are not 0 and -0.02069), and the printed rows 4 and 5 of M' are not orthogonal (their product is 0.89). Found -0.0852509.
Eigenvector: m4, x5p. 702
Book 0.80990Data 0.53286
Klein and Marshall's reduction as the book reprints it is wrong in its last two axes: the authors' equation gives the eigenvalues -0.13168, -0.11121, 0.01996, -0.01282 and -0.00786 (the last two sum to the printed -0.02069, but are not 0 and -0.02069), and the printed rows 4 and 5 of M' are not orthogonal (their product is 0.89). Found 0.532862.
Eigenvector: m5, x1p. 702
Book 0.24178Data -0.07659
Klein and Marshall's reduction as the book reprints it is wrong in its last two axes: the authors' equation gives the eigenvalues -0.13168, -0.11121, 0.01996, -0.01282 and -0.00786 (the last two sum to the printed -0.02069, but are not 0 and -0.02069), and the printed rows 4 and 5 of M' are not orthogonal (their product is 0.89). Found -0.0765853.
Eigenvector: m5, x2p. 702
Book -0.19807Data -0.27736
Klein and Marshall's reduction as the book reprints it is wrong in its last two axes: the authors' equation gives the eigenvalues -0.13168, -0.11121, 0.01996, -0.01282 and -0.00786 (the last two sum to the printed -0.02069, but are not 0 and -0.02069), and the printed rows 4 and 5 of M' are not orthogonal (their product is 0.89). Found -0.277357.
Eigenvector: m5, x3p. 702
Book 0.12837Data 0.43154
Klein and Marshall's reduction as the book reprints it is wrong in its last two axes: the authors' equation gives the eigenvalues -0.13168, -0.11121, 0.01996, -0.01282 and -0.00786 (the last two sum to the printed -0.02069, but are not 0 and -0.02069), and the printed rows 4 and 5 of M' are not orthogonal (their product is 0.89). Found 0.431538.
Eigenvector: m5, x4p. 702
Book 0.52994Data 0.58210
Klein and Marshall's reduction as the book reprints it is wrong in its last two axes: the authors' equation gives the eigenvalues -0.13168, -0.11121, 0.01996, -0.01282 and -0.00786 (the last two sum to the printed -0.02069, but are not 0 and -0.02069), and the printed rows 4 and 5 of M' are not orthogonal (their product is 0.89). Found 0.582105.
Eigenvector: m5, x5p. 702
Book 0.77464Data 0.62621
Klein and Marshall's reduction as the book reprints it is wrong in its last two axes: the authors' equation gives the eigenvalues -0.13168, -0.11121, 0.01996, -0.01282 and -0.00786 (the last two sum to the printed -0.02069, but are not 0 and -0.02069), and the printed rows 4 and 5 of M' are not orthogonal (their product is 0.89). Found 0.626209.
Stationary point: ŷ in the plane X̃1 = X̃2 = X̃5 = 0p. 702
Book 1.5029Data 1.0529
Book misprint: the constant is ŷS, printed two lines above as 1.0529 (the authors' equation gives 1.0529); 1.5029 transposes its digits.
Lack of fit msp. 703
Book 363Data 366
Book misprint: 2,198/6 = 366.3 and the fit gives 366.417; the table prints 363.
Lack of fit fp. 703
Book 8.07Data 8.06
Follows the misprinted mean square: 363/45 = 8.07; the fit gives 366.42/45.47 = 8.05902.
Stationary point: yield: predictedp. 703
Book -85.25Data 97.45
Book slip: the exercise's yield equation gives ŷS = b0 + ½XS'b = 97.4536 at the printed XS (1.15, 1.10, 1.11, 0.49, 0.68), with the printed eigenvalues; the answer prints -85.25.
Canonical: yield: constant of X̃1p. 703
Book 0.09Data 1.88
Book slip: the printed matrix holds the eigenvectors as its columns (checked element by element) but X̃ = (matrix)X + c applies it by rows, and the printed constants are -(matrix)XS row-wise (numpy: yield 0.10, 1.38, 0.71, 0.68, -1.21; purity -1.04, 1.24, 0.63, 0.77, 1.72); -mi'XS with the columns is 1.8803.
Canonical: yield: constant of X̃2p. 703
Book 1.38Data -0.29
Book slip: the printed matrix holds the eigenvectors as its columns (checked element by element) but X̃ = (matrix)X + c applies it by rows, and the printed constants are -(matrix)XS row-wise (numpy: yield 0.10, 1.38, 0.71, 0.68, -1.21; purity -1.04, 1.24, 0.63, 0.77, 1.72); -mi'XS with the columns is -0.286862.
Eigenvector: yield: m3, X5p. 703
Book 0.53Data 0.57
Book misprint: the yield equation gives 0.567288, which rounds to 0.57; the matrix prints 0.53.
Canonical: yield: constant of X̃3p. 703
Book 0.71Data -0.18
Book slip: the printed matrix holds the eigenvectors as its columns (checked element by element) but X̃ = (matrix)X + c applies it by rows, and the printed constants are -(matrix)XS row-wise (numpy: yield 0.10, 1.38, 0.71, 0.68, -1.21; purity -1.04, 1.24, 0.63, 0.77, 1.72); -mi'XS with the columns is -0.183732.
Canonical: yield: constant of X̃4p. 703
Book 0.68Data -0.50
Book slip: the printed matrix holds the eigenvectors as its columns (checked element by element) but X̃ = (matrix)X + c applies it by rows, and the printed constants are -(matrix)XS row-wise (numpy: yield 0.10, 1.38, 0.71, 0.68, -1.21; purity -1.04, 1.24, 0.63, 0.77, 1.72); -mi'XS with the columns is -0.502585.
Canonical: yield: constant of X̃5p. 703
Book -1.25Data 0.75
Book slip: the printed matrix holds the eigenvectors as its columns (checked element by element) but X̃ = (matrix)X + c applies it by rows, and the printed constants are -(matrix)XS row-wise (numpy: yield 0.10, 1.38, 0.71, 0.68, -1.21; purity -1.04, 1.24, 0.63, 0.77, 1.72); -mi'XS with the columns is 0.751074.
Extra ms: first orderp. 704
Book 186.46Data 186.48
Book slip: 559.43/3 = 186.48, and the fit gives 186.477; the answer prints 186.46.
Stationary point: purity: predictedp. 704
Book 68.97Data 68.07
Book slip: the exercise's purity equation gives ŷS = 68.0697 at the printed XS, with the printed eigenvalues; the answer prints 68.97.
Canonical: purity: constant of X̃1p. 704
Book -1.03Data 1.93
Book slip: the printed matrix holds the eigenvectors as its columns (checked element by element) but X̃ = (matrix)X + c applies it by rows, and the printed constants are -(matrix)XS row-wise (numpy: yield 0.10, 1.38, 0.71, 0.68, -1.21; purity -1.04, 1.24, 0.63, 0.77, 1.72); -mi'XS with the columns is 1.93096.
Canonical: purity: constant of X̃2p. 704
Book 1.24Data 0.05
Book slip: the printed matrix holds the eigenvectors as its columns (checked element by element) but X̃ = (matrix)X + c applies it by rows, and the printed constants are -(matrix)XS row-wise (numpy: yield 0.10, 1.38, 0.71, 0.68, -1.21; purity -1.04, 1.24, 0.63, 0.77, 1.72); -mi'XS with the columns is 0.0474314.
Canonical: purity: constant of X̃3p. 704
Book 0.63Data -1.02
Book slip: the printed matrix holds the eigenvectors as its columns (checked element by element) but X̃ = (matrix)X + c applies it by rows, and the printed constants are -(matrix)XS row-wise (numpy: yield 0.10, 1.38, 0.71, 0.68, -1.21; purity -1.04, 1.24, 0.63, 0.77, 1.72); -mi'XS with the columns is -1.02209.
Canonical: purity: constant of X̃4p. 704
Book 0.78Data 0.55
Book slip: the printed matrix holds the eigenvectors as its columns (checked element by element) but X̃ = (matrix)X + c applies it by rows, and the printed constants are -(matrix)XS row-wise (numpy: yield 0.10, 1.38, 0.71, 0.68, -1.21; purity -1.04, 1.24, 0.63, 0.77, 1.72); -mi'XS with the columns is 0.549163.
Canonical: purity: constant of X̃5p. 704
Book 1.72Data 1.22
Book slip: the printed matrix holds the eigenvectors as its columns (checked element by element) but X̃ = (matrix)X + c applies it by rows, and the printed constants are -(matrix)XS row-wise (numpy: yield 0.10, 1.38, 0.71, 0.68, -1.21; purity -1.04, 1.24, 0.63, 0.77, 1.72); -mi'XS with the columns is 1.22065.
Stationary point: Calciump. 706
Book 0.777619Data 0.787500
Book slip: the answer's own printed equation (and the fit) gives xS = (0.7875, -0.1423) and ŷS = 9.135, with the printed eigenvalues; found 0.7875.
Stationary point: Phosphorusp. 706
Book -0.144422Data -0.142343
Book slip: the answer's own printed equation (and the fit) gives xS = (0.7875, -0.1423) and ŷS = 9.135, with the printed eigenvalues; found -0.142343.
Stationary point: predictedp. 706
Book 9.268Data 9.135
Book slip: the answer's own printed equation (and the fit) gives xS = (0.7875, -0.1423) and ŷS = 9.135, with the printed eigenvalues; found 9.13533.
Stationary point: Calcium, actualp. 706
Book 47Data 5
Book misprint: 3.75 + 1.25x1S = 4.73437 from the fit (4.72 from the answer's own x1S); the printed 47 has lost its decimal point.
Coefficient: quadratic: Interceptp. 706
Book -307.73Data -165.07
Book slip: the intercept and linear coefficients of the two printed equations are interchanged; the fit gives -165.068 here, the value printed in the other equation (quadratic -165.07, 59.859, 61.732; cubic -307.73, 126.38, 98.847).
Coefficient: quadratic: x1p. 706
Book 126.38Data 59.86
Book slip: the intercept and linear coefficients of the two printed equations are interchanged; the fit gives 59.8592 here, the value printed in the other equation (quadratic -165.07, 59.859, 61.732; cubic -307.73, 126.38, 98.847).
Coefficient: quadratic: x2p. 706
Book 98.847Data 61.732
Book slip: the intercept and linear coefficients of the two printed equations are interchanged; the fit gives 61.732 here, the value printed in the other equation (quadratic -165.07, 59.859, 61.732; cubic -307.73, 126.38, 98.847).
Coefficient: cubic: Interceptp. 706
Book -165.07Data -307.73
Book slip: the intercept and linear coefficients of the two printed equations are interchanged; the fit gives -307.732 here, the value printed in the other equation (quadratic -165.07, 59.859, 61.732; cubic -307.73, 126.38, 98.847).
Coefficient: cubic: x1p. 706
Book 59.859Data 126.376
Book slip: the intercept and linear coefficients of the two printed equations are interchanged; the fit gives 126.376 here, the value printed in the other equation (quadratic -165.07, 59.859, 61.732; cubic -307.73, 126.38, 98.847).
Coefficient: cubic: x2p. 706
Book 61.732Data 98.847
Book slip: the intercept and linear coefficients of the two printed equations are interchanged; the fit gives 98.8468 here, the value printed in the other equation (quadratic -165.07, 59.859, 61.732; cubic -307.73, 126.38, 98.847).
Coefficient: cubic: x2²p. 706
Book -6.533Data -6.347
Book slip: the cubic's x2² coefficient is -6.34733; the printed -6.533 is the quadratic's.
Coefficient: cubic: x1²x2p. 706
Book -0.4188Data 0.2998
Book slip: the printed third-order coefficients are rotated: the fit gives x1²x2 0.2998, x1x2² 1.3508 and x2³ -0.4188, printed as -0.4188, 0.2998 and 1.3508; found 0.299807.
Coefficient: cubic: x1x2²p. 706
Book 0.2998Data 1.3509
Book slip: the printed third-order coefficients are rotated: the fit gives x1²x2 0.2998, x1x2² 1.3508 and x2³ -0.4188, printed as -0.4188, 0.2998 and 1.3508; found 1.35085.
Coefficient: cubic: x2³p. 706
Book 1.3508Data -0.4188
Book slip: the printed third-order coefficients are rotated: the fit gives x1²x2 0.2998, x1x2² 1.3508 and x2³ -0.4188, printed as -0.4188, 0.2998 and 1.3508; found -0.418795.
Extra ms: cubic: first order|b0p. 707
Book 779.5Data 729.3
Book misprint: 1,459/2 = 729.5, and the fit gives 729.283; the table prints 779.5.
Extra f: cubic: first order|b0p. 707
Book 17.6Data 16.4
Follows the misprinted mean square: 779.5/44.4 = 17.6; the fit gives 729.28/44.39 = 16.4304.
Classification: y1p. 707
Book maximumData saddle_point
Book slip: Table E11.25c's y1 coefficients give B with eigenvalues -0.298 and +0.029 (det < 0), a saddle centred at (8.2, 10.7), outside the region; the library says saddle_point, not a maximum.
Classification: y4p. 707
Book minimumData saddle_point
Book slip: Table E11.25c's y4 coefficients give B with eigenvalues -0.017 and +0.067 (det < 0), a saddle centred at (2.79, 3.35), outside the region; the library says saddle_point, not a minimum.
Canonical: model III: eigenvalue 1 of Bp. 710
Book -0.544Data -0.545
The answer's model III numbers follow b12 = 0.3410 for N^1/2 P^1/2, not the exercise's printed 0.34310 (solving 2Bx = -b at the printed stationary point gives b12/2 = 0.17050 and 0.17051 from its two rows); with 0.3410 the eigenvalues are -0.5443 and -0.1887
Canonical: model III: eigenvalue 2 of Bp. 710
Book -0.189Data -0.188
The answer's model III numbers follow b12 = 0.3410 for N^1/2 P^1/2, not the exercise's printed 0.34310 (solving 2Bx = -b at the printed stationary point gives b12/2 = 0.17050 and 0.17051 from its two rows); with 0.3410 the eigenvalues are -0.5443 and -0.1887
Stationary point: model III: N^1/2p. 710
Book 19.9624Data 20.0761
The answer's model III numbers follow b12 = 0.3410 for N^1/2 P^1/2, not the exercise's printed 0.34310 (solving 2Bx = -b at the printed stationary point gives b12/2 = 0.17050 and 0.17051 from its two rows); with 0.3410 the stationary point is (19.9624, 18.3725) exactly
Stationary point: model III: P^1/2p. 710
Book 18.3725Data 18.4696
The answer's model III numbers follow b12 = 0.3410 for N^1/2 P^1/2, not the exercise's printed 0.34310 (solving 2Bx = -b at the printed stationary point gives b12/2 = 0.17050 and 0.17051 from its two rows); with 0.3410 the stationary point is (19.9624, 18.3725) exactly
Stationary point: model III: Np. 710
Book 398Data 403
The answer's model III numbers follow b12 = 0.3410 for N^1/2 P^1/2, not the exercise's printed 0.34310 (solving 2Bx = -b at the printed stationary point gives b12/2 = 0.17050 and 0.17051 from its two rows); with 0.3410 the stationary point has N = 19.9624^2 = 398.5
Stationary point: model III: Pp. 710
Book 338Data 341
The answer's model III numbers follow b12 = 0.3410 for N^1/2 P^1/2, not the exercise's printed 0.34310 (solving 2Bx = -b at the printed stationary point gives b12/2 = 0.17050 and 0.17051 from its two rows); with 0.3410 the stationary point has P = 18.3725^2 = 337.55
Stationary point: model III: y-hat at the maximump. 710
Book 147.3Data 148.1
The answer's model III numbers follow b12 = 0.3410 for N^1/2 P^1/2, not the exercise's printed 0.34310 (solving 2Bx = -b at the printed stationary point gives b12/2 = 0.17050 and 0.17051 from its two rows); with 0.3410 the maximum is 147.30
Ridge path: model III: lambda where the path leaves the regionp. 710
Book 0.0207Data 0.0217
The answer's model III numbers follow b12 = 0.3410 for N^1/2 P^1/2, not the exercise's printed 0.34310 (solving 2Bx = -b at the printed stationary point gives b12/2 = 0.17050 and 0.17051 from its two rows); with 0.3410 the multiplier on the sphere N + P = 599 is 0.02063, and Eq. (12.2.8) at lambda = 0.0207 puts the path at (N, P) = (319.9, 278.7)
Ridge path: model III: y-hat where the path leaves the regionp. 710
Book 145.95Data 146.59
The answer's model III numbers follow b12 = 0.3410 for N^1/2 P^1/2, not the exercise's printed 0.34310 (solving 2Bx = -b at the printed stationary point gives b12/2 = 0.17050 and 0.17051 from its two rows); with 0.3410 the maximum on the sphere N + P = 599 is 145.96, and Eq. (12.2.8) at lambda = 0.0207 gives 145.95
Ridge path: lambda = 100: x6p. 710
Book -0.233Data -0.223
Eq. (12.2.8) at lambda = 100 gives x6 = -0.2226 (the library on the printed sphere -0.2225); the printed -0.233 is a misprint of -0.223
Ridge path: full quadratic, lambda = 0.57: x1p. 712
Book 0.979Data 0.978
The row's R, 0.979, is the radius of (0.977, -0.051, -0.011); Eq. (12.2.8) at lambda = 0.57 gives x1 = 0.977 and the library on the printed sphere 0.9776: the printed 0.979 is a misprint of 0.977
Ridge path: path 4, lambda = -100: x2p. 713
Book 0.001Data -0.001
Eq. (12.2.8) at lambda = -100 gives (-0.0005, -0.0010), and the library on the sphere R = 0.001 gives x2 = -0.0009: x2 is -0.001, the printed minus sign missing
Ridge path: y2, lambda = 0: x2p. 714
Book 0.261Data 0.260
The stationary point of the y2 surface is (-0.574, 0.260), as Table 11.25d prints it; the printed 0.261 is one unit high
Ridge path: y3, lambda = -0.3: lambdap. 714
Book -0.3Data -0.0
The row's point lies on the path at lambda = -0.030 (a maximum path needs lambda above the largest eigenvalue, -0.0787); the printed -0.3 is a misprint of -0.03
Ridge path: y3, lambda = -0.4: lambdap. 714
Book -0.4Data -0.0
The row's point lies on the path at lambda = -0.040 (a maximum path needs lambda above the largest eigenvalue, -0.0787); the printed -0.4 is a misprint of -0.04
Ridge path: lambda = 50: lambdap. 714
Book 50Data 80
The row's point (1.719, -1.356, 0.171), R = 2.196, y-hat = 975 lies on the path at lambda = 80.0; at lambda = 50 Eq. (12.2.8) puts the path at R = 5.906: the printed 50 is a misprint of 80
Ridge path: lambda = -0.1: x1p. 715
Book -0.767Data -0.770
The row's R, 0.829, is the radius of (-0.770, -0.051, -0.303), and Eq. (12.2.8) at lambda = -0.1 gives x1 = -0.770; the printed -0.767 is a misprint of -0.770
Coefficient: B-form b, x1p. 719
Book -6.902Data -6.906
B1 is -6.90625 (the fitted equation prints -6.9062); the printed -6.902 is a misprint of -6.906
Coefficient: B[1,1]p. 719
Book 0.285Data -0.285
B11 is -0.2847 (the fitted equation prints -0.285); the minus sign of B[1,1] is missing
Canonical: eigenvalue 1 of Bp. 719
Book -3.64Data -3.55
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Canonical: eigenvalue 2 of Bp. 719
Book -0.66Data -0.56
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Canonical: eigenvalue 3 of Bp. 719
Book 3.14Data 3.48
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 10: x1p. 720
Book -0.44Data -0.43
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 10: x2p. 720
Book -0.03Data -0.02
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 10: x3p. 720
Book 0.41Data 0.42
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 6: x1p. 720
Book -0.99Data -0.95
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 6: x2p. 720
Book -0.07Data -0.06
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 6: x3p. 720
Book 1.04Data 1.06
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 6: y-hatp. 720
Book 49.8Data 50.2
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.5: x1p. 720
Book -1.18Data -1.14
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.5: x2p. 720
Book -0.08Data -0.07
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.5: x3p. 720
Book 1.27Data 1.31
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.5: y-hatp. 720
Book 55.3Data 56.2
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.5: lambdap. 720
Book 5.5Data 5.8
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.4: x1p. 720
Book -1.23Data -1.19
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.4: x2p. 720
Book -0.08Data -0.07
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.4: x3p. 720
Book 1.33Data 1.38
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.4: y-hatp. 720
Book 56.7Data 57.8
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.4: lambdap. 720
Book 5.4Data 5.7
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.3: x1p. 720
Book -1.29Data -1.24
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.3: x2p. 720
Book -0.09Data -0.07
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.3: x3p. 720
Book 1.39Data 1.44
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.3: y-hatp. 720
Book 58.4Data 59.5
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.3: lambdap. 720
Book 5.3Data 5.6
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.19: x1p. 720
Book -1.35Data -1.30
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.19: x2p. 720
Book -0.09Data -0.08
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.19: x3p. 720
Book 1.47Data 1.52
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.19: y-hatp. 720
Book 60.5Data 61.6
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Ridge path: lambda = 5.19: lambdap. 720
Book 5.19Data 5.50
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Optimum: optimum response on or in a sphere of radius 2p. 720
Book 60.5Data 61.6
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Optimum: its coded point: x1p. 720
Book -1.35Data -1.30
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Optimum: its coded point: x2p. 720
Book -0.09Data -0.08
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Optimum: its coded point: x3p. 720
Book 1.47Data 1.52
The answer's eigenvalues and ridge table follow a surface with b33 about 1.17 in place of the fitted b33 = 1.690 it prints (b33 = 1.17 gives eigenvalues -3.638, -0.656, 3.143 and the table's points to within a unit in the last digit); the printed surface, which the data reproduce, has eigenvalues -3.550, -0.561, 3.481 and on the sphere R = 2 its maximum is 61.64 at (-1.296, -0.075, 1.521), lambda = 5.50
Coefficient: y1: B[1,3]p. 720
Book 4.1935Data 4.1937
B13/2 = 8.3875/2 = 4.19375; the printed 4.1935 drops the digit 7
Coefficient: y1: B[2,3]p. 720
Book 9.2685Data 9.2688
B23/2 = 18.5375/2 = 9.26875; the printed 9.2685 drops the digit 7
R squared: y1p. 720
Book 0.910Data 0.900
The R^2 of the two responses are swapped: the fit of y1 gives 0.900 and that of y2 0.910
Ridge path: y1, lambda = -10.5: lambdap. 720
Book -10.5Data -10.1
The row's point lies on the path at lambda = -10.05 (the rows run -10.1, -10.05, -10.01, -10 as R grows); the printed -10.5, here and in the text, is a misprint of -10.05
Coefficient: y2: b, x2p. 721
Book -6.984Data -6.948
The fit gives b2 = -6.948, and Table E12.11c follows -6.948; the printed -6.984 transposes two digits
R squared: y2p. 721
Book 0.900Data 0.910
The R^2 of the two responses are swapped: the fit of y2 gives 0.910 and that of y1 0.900
Lack of fit msp. 722
Book 51,851Data 10370
The printed mean square is the sum of squares undivided by its 5 df; 51,850.5/5 = 10,370.1
Lack of fit fp. 722
Book 2.72Data 2.18
The printed F is 51,851/19,067, the sums of squares undivided by their df; with the mean squares, 10,370.1/4,766.7 = 2.18 on 5 and 4 df
Pure error msp. 722
Book 19,067Data 4767
The printed mean square is the sum of squares undivided by its 4 df; 19,066.7/4 = 4,766.7
Coefficient: x1x3p. 731
Book −4Data 4
Table E16.5's y = 7 at (0.5, 0, 0.5) gives b13 = 4(7) - 2(6 + 6) = +4; the printed -4 has the wrong sign
Prediction: ŷ at the centroid (1/3, 1/3, 1/3)p. 731
Book 7.11Data 8.00
With b13 = +4 the centroid prediction is 8 + (-4 + 4 + 0)/9 = 8; the printed 8 - 8/9 = 7.11 carries the sign slip in b13
Coefficient: x1x2(x1 − x2)p. 731
Book −54Data -6.69182e-15
The exact fit gives 0 for x1x2(x1 - x2); with the printed -54 the equation predicts 3 and 13 at (2/3, 1/3, 0) and (1/3, 2/3, 0), where Table E16.6 has 7 and 9
Pseudocomponents: run 6: water, alcohol, ureap. 733
Row 6 of Table E17.5a prints the percentages 0, 3, 3 instead of the pseudocomponents 0, 0.5, 0.5
Coefficient: E19.1c: x4p. 736
Book 3.67Data 3.66
The fit of Eq. (E19.1c) gives 3.6633, which rounds to 3.66; the book's 3.67 is the x4 coefficient of Eq. (E19.1a), 3.6656, carried over
Book 20.69Data 21.08
The refitted model predicts 21.08 at the centroid; the book repeats 20.69, the full model's value, from the first table, and the second table's other rows agree with the refitted model
Not yet
Answers the book prints that Factorial cannot compute yet, by what it lacks.
- The library has no ridge analysis under linear restrictionspp. 605, 607, 608 and more
- The library has no robust fit of a model by reweighting (process_improve.regression has repeated-median and Theil-Sen lines only)pp. 227, 228 and 229
- The library has no all-bias composite designpp. 246 and 247
- The library has no steepest ascent subject to a linear constraint (the point where the path meets the constraint, and the path projected onto it)pp. 200, 201, 656 and more
- The library has no intermediate (secondary) ridge pathspp. 396 and 713
Show the rest
- The library has no log transformation of a factorpp. 694 and 695
- The library has no placement of a first-order design by matching its second-order moments to those of a spherical region (an all-bias design)pp. 205 and 206
- The library has no placement of a first-order design by matching its second-order moments to those of a cuboidal region (an all-bias design)pp. 206 and 207
- The library has no ridge analysis about a focus f other than the originp. 400
- The library has no projection of a mixture design into a component-amount design, and the catalogue's design checks build a design from factors coded -1 to +1 and cannot make a mixture designp. 576
- The library has no tool that tabulates points of a stationary ridge and converts them through the log codings (11.5.1)p. 362
- The library has no orthogonal and normalized basis T of the space orthogonal to the restrictions (Appendix 19A)pp. 605, 607, 609 and more
- The library has no direct (nonlinear least squares) fit of a canonical formpp. 352, 353, 358 and more
- The library has no distribution of the ratio of the largest to the smallest of k independent chi-squared(1) variables (Hartley's Fmax for 1 df), which this integral isp. 204
- The library has no canonical reduction of a second-order model subject to linear restrictions (it reproducespp. 625, 626 and 627
- The library has no iteratively reweighted least squares (no t-distribution or other robust weights, and no weighted least squares with given weights)p. 75
- The library has no reduction of a quadratic to the space a set of linear restrictions leaves, so no matrix TBT' or its eigenvalues (it reproducespp. 606, 607, 737 and more
- The library has no orthogonal and normalized basis T of the space orthogonal to the restrictions (Appendix 19A) (it reproducesp. 612
- The library has no A canonical formpp. 332, 348, 351 and more
- The library has no axial points at another distancep. 730
- The library has no integrated variance-plus-bias criterion for a weight function, nor minimum-bias designsp. 424
- The library has no test or sum of squares about a stated parameter vectorp. 630
- The library has no rule for an approximate limiting formpp. 684, 685, 695 and more
- The library has no projection of a mixture design into a component-amount designpp. 572, 573, 575 and more
- The library has no transformation of the predictors in a model (analyze_experiment refuses np.log in a formula), so no fit on log xi3 and log xi4 can be checkedp. 678
- The library has no designs in ratios of mixture components, nor a conversion from ratios to proportionsp. 555
- The library has no orthogonally blocked mixture or component-amount designs, nor a search over the parameters of a Latin-square designpp. 579, 580 and 583
- The library has no confidence region (cone) for the direction of steepest ascentpp. 196 and 197
- The library has no alias matrix against third-order termspp. 314, 315 and 316
- The library has no steepest ascent subject to linear restrictions (Eq. 19.6.1) (it reproducespp. 740 and 741
- The library has no canonical reduction of a second-order model subject to linear restrictions (it reproduces from the printed W equationspp. 626 and 627
- The library has no residual matrix X_2.1 = X2 - X(X'X)^-1 X'X2 of the omitted terms, nor the noncentrality X_2.1'X_2.1 of the lack-of-fit test it givesp. 432
- The library has no solution of several fitted models for their targets at once (the intersection of two contour planes)p. 110
- The library has no conversion between ratio variables and mixture proportionsp. 556
- The library has no continuous (approximate) design measures, only exact designs of N runspp. 475, 478 and 480
- An intermediate column of Yates' algorithm for a 3^k factorial (the operations (0) w1 + w2 + w3, (i) w3 - w1 and (i²) w1 - 2w2 + w3 applied once or twice); the library's yates_table is for two-level factorials only, and column (4) and the effects are checked by regression on the orthogonal polynomial columnspp. 242 and 243
- The library has no moments of a region or weight function (here the uniform density over the unit sphere)pp. 426 and 428
- The library cannot set a composite design's centre runs block by blockpp. 484, 492, 494 and more
- The library has no small composite designs built on Plackett-Burman columns (Draper 1985b)p. 502
- The library has no test of a stated parameter vectorpp. 48 and 49
- The library has no analysis of variance about a stated parameter vectorp. 49
- Rows of the alias matrix A = (Z1'Z1)^-1 Z1'Z2 of the second-degree model against the ten third-order terms; the library's alias matrix (evaluate_design, alias_terms 'interactions' or 'quadratic') works out biases from omitted two-factor interactions and squares only, not from third-order terms or a model the user namesp. 224
- The library has no efficiency of one design against another for a group of coefficients after scaling the designs to the same second momentp. 691
- The library has no alias matrix for omitted third-order termsp. 726
- The library has no design that matches the moments of a region (a minimum-bias design)pp. 427 and 429
- The library has no Westlake designsp. 501
- The library has no solve for the (real) number of centre runs at which V(0) equals V at a chosen radiusp. 727
- The library has no regular simplex designs, and the edge is arithmetic of Np. 507
- The library has no regular simplex designsp. 729
- The library has no alias matrix against a named regressor (evaluate_design's alias_terms takes only interactions or squares) and no orthogonalization of one regressor on othersp. 631
- The library has no alias matrix against a named set of omitted terms (evaluate_design takes alias_terms 'interactions' or 'quadratic' only), though (X1'X1)^-1 and X1'X2 are checkedp. 660
- The library has no confidence region for a subset of the coefficients (its joint_confidence_region bounds all p together)p. 661
- The library has no transformation of the predictors in a modelp. 287
- The library has no such summary, and it needs the slopes θi, which it does not reportpp. 348 and 358
- The library has no log coding of a factorp. 705
- The library has no Bartlett correctionp. 565
- The library makes no three-quarter fractionp. 159
- The library has no moments of a region or of a designpp. 245 and 247
- The library has no design that matches the moments of a region (the all-bias conditions of Appendix 13B)p. 724
- The library does not test whether two designs are rotations of each otherpp. 487 and 497
- The library has no catalogue of projection-optimal three-level screening designsp. 500
- The library has no full simplex centroid design for five or more componentsp. 526
- The library has no test of the U-simplex condition U - Umin <= 1 and no U-pseudocomponentsp. 543
- The library has no analysis of variance about a stated parameter value, its sums of squares test terms against zerop. 44
- The library has no analysis of variance about a stated parameter valuep. 44
- The total sum of squares about the hypothesised mean 0.5, Σ(y - η0)²; the library's totals are about the mean or about zero (model_summary ss_total and ss_total_uncorrected), and it has no analysis of variance about a stated parameter valuep. 44
- The least squares coefficient of z2 regressed on z1, (z1'z1)^-1 z1'z2, the alias of z1 for z2; the library's alias matrix is worked only against interactions and squares left out of a model, not against a named regressor, and it has no orthogonalization of one regressor on othersp. 49
- The library has no orthogonalization of one regressor on others (the checks below write it into the model as z2 - 0.2 z1)p. 49
- The library has no test or sum of squares about a stated parameter vector, and the catalogue's classical_test cannot square the t it readsp. 630
- Values of the standard normal distribution function; the library gives its quantiles (z_value), not the function itself (they reproduce)p. 113
- A value of the standard normal distribution function; the library gives its quantiles, not the function itself (it reproduces)p. 113
- The library has no matching of effect signs to a run of the table of signsp. 117
- The library has no detection of an aberrant observation from the effects of an unreplicated two-level factorialp. 118
- The library has no normal plot or Lenth's method for estimates given without their runs. Lenth's method worked by hand on the 15 contrasts (PSE 4.5, ME 11.6 at 5%) flags 4, 2 and 1p. 632
- The library has no normal plot or Lenth's method for estimates given without their runs. Lenth's method worked by hand on the 15 contrasts (PSE 7.43, ME 19.1 at 5%) flags D alonep. 632
- The library has no normal plot or Lenth's method for estimates given without their runs. Lenth's method worked by hand on the 31 estimates (PSE 44.25, ME 98.2 at 5%) flags E, C and Ap. 126
- The library has no stepwise selection by F-to-enter and F-to-remove (its search scores by AICc with strong heredity, which would not admit x5x6 without x6)p. 653
- The library does not give, and the book gives no formula herep. 219
- The alias matrix of the second-degree model against third-order terms; the library's alias matrix (evaluate_design, alias_terms 'interactions' or 'quadratic') works out biases from omitted two-factor interactions and squares only, not from third-order terms or a model the user namesp. 235
- The library has no function that returns a model's extra columns made orthogonal to a fitted model (Z2 - Z1A). Run 15's 133 entry is printed 2/3p. 237
- The effects a normal plot of the 26 signed standardized components labels; the library's normal plot (Lenth's effects) is for two-level factorials and has no single-degree-of-freedom components of a 3^k; the components are column sqrt(8) of Table 7G.1p. 241
- The effects a normal plot of the 26 signed standardized components labels; the library's normal plot (Lenth's effects) is for two-level factorials and has no single-degree-of-freedom components of a 3^k; the components are column sqrt(8) of Table 7G.2p. 241
- The library has no robust fit. They carry the largest residuals of the ordinary fit, 2.61 and -2.41p. 230
- The library has no power transform of the response with an exponent the user sets, such as -1/2p. 272
- The library has no transformation of the predictors in a model (analyze_experiment refuses np.log in a formula)p. 287
- The library has no two-parameter (shifted) Box-Cox transformation, nor the likelihood surface over (lambda1, lambda2)p. 292
- The library has no transformation of a predictor (np.log is refused in a model formula), and regression.box_tidwell builds a constructed variable of its own internally and does not return itp. 297
- The library has no confidence region for the stationary point of a fitted quadratic (Box and Hunter 1954)p. 313
- The library has no alias matrix against third-order terms (alias_terms takes 'interactions' or 'quadratic' only)p. 681
- The four independent columns of Z2.1, with the 19 runs taken as the 8 cube runs, the 6 axial runs and the 5 centre runs: the first three are x_i^3 orthogonalised against the model (-x_i on the cube, z times the sign of x_i on its axial pair), the fourth x1x2x3; each is orthogonal to every column of the model of (c) (numpy); the library's third_order_contrasts gives the first three as each factor's axial slope less its factorial slope, one eighth of these contrasts (8 x 3.7681 = 30.145 for x1, whose square over 8 + 2z^2 is the 47.06 below), but not their coefficients, nor the fourth; no check kind calls itp. 681
- The library has no such summary, and it needs the slopes θi, which it does not report (from the unrounded θ and λ, r = (10.04, 5.91, 4.17))p. 348
- The library has no limiting (ridge) form that drops several small eigenvaluesp. 351
- The library has no such summary, and it needs the slopes θi, which it does not report. From the unrounded θ and λ, r3 = 0.50p. 351
- The library has no distance to a ridge of several small eigenvaluesp. 351
- Ŷ at R, the point of the plane X̃1 = 0 nearest the design origin, from (11.4.9); the library's ridge form (ridge_form) takes one axis, that of the smallest eigenvalue, as the ridge and sets its origin where the response is stationary along all the others; it has no form that treats several eigenvalues as negligible and takes as origin the point R of the plane X̃1 = 0 nearest the design centrep. 357
- 10^(2^1/4 x1S + log 0.02) = 0.00256 from the checked x1S; the library converts coded to actual units linearly between a factor's low and high and has no log coding of a factorp. 705
- Y-bar_c - y-bar_c0 - (k/alpha^2)(y-bar_s - y-bar_s0) = 1.3925 from the printed y (the 8CC column times y is 11.14, eight times it); no check computes this contrast of a two-block composite designp. 445
- Sigma {1/nc + 1/nc0 + (k^2/alpha^4)[1/(2k rs) + 1/ns0]}^1/2 of Eq. (13.8.28) with sigma^2 = 0.457 (0.75202); it uses the pure error mean square s_e^2 = 0.457 for sigma^2; no check kind computes this contrast (see above) or its standard error, and 0.457 is itself not what the printed data give (see the pure error rows)p. 445
- The coefficient Q of the variance function, which enters it only through 2Q + 1/B; the library gives the prediction variance at points, not its coefficients, so Q is checked only through the variance function at the cube and axial runsp. 725
- The coefficient R of r^4 in the variance function; the library gives the prediction variance at points, not its coefficients, so R is checked only through the variance function at the cube and axial runsp. 725
- The rotatable α^2 with the star run twice, solved from the condition above (checked there for k = 3, α^2 = 2); arithmetic; the library's rotatable α takes the cube and the star run equally often (n_replicates repeats both), so it has no rotatable α for a star replicated alonep. 728
- The library has no function that gives the centre runs for orthogonal blocking at a chosen α (blocking_alpha gives α from them)p. 728
- The library has no function that solves for Bp. 728
- The library has no Draper-Lin small composite designsp. 508
- The multiplier at the centre, reached as λ goes to -∞; the library reports no multiplier at radius 0p. 730
- The library has no t-test of a prediction against a stated value with an external estimate of σ²p. 731
- The library has no orthogonally blocked mixture designsp. 590
- The library has no rule or function for combining two fractions of the same familyp. 146
- The library has no function that projects a regular fraction onto some of its factors and reports the design left (its defining relation and replication)p. 149
- The library does not classify projections by type (66 and 396 hold, worked here)p. 156
- The library has no such augmentationp. 156
- A nonregular design has no defining relation; each main effect is partly aliased with two-factor interactions (correlations of 1/3 for n = 12); the library reports no resolution for a design without generatorsp. 152
- The library makes no Rechtschaffner designp. 159
- The library makes no Tobias designp. 159
- The library makes no such design (its smallest regular fraction of resolution V in nine factors has 128 runs)p. 159
- The library makes no such design (its smallest regular fraction of resolution V in ten factors has 128 runs)p. 159
- The library makes no three-quarter fraction (its smallest regular fraction of resolution V in 11 factors has 128 runs)p. 159
- The library cannot find a design's defining relation from its runs (evaluate_design reports none without generators) and makes no three-quarter fractionp. 159
- 8 = I: the eighth factor's column is all plus signs in the first fraction, which no library fraction holdsp. 639
- -8 = I: the eighth factor's column is all minus signs in the folded fraction, which no library fraction holdsp. 639
- The library has no search for a fraction that estimates a named set of interactionsp. 642
- The library has no continuous (approximate) design measures, only exact designs of N runs, so no variance function of a measurep. 475
- The library has no continuous (approximate) design measures, only exact designs of N runs, so there is no measure to compare them withp. 473
- The library has no regular simplex (Box 1952) first-order designsp. 487
- Hartley's number of points for two factors; the library refuses a fractional cube for fewer than three factorsp. 501
- The library has no Koshal designs (it evaluates the printed ones, checked here and in the entries that follow)p. 503
- The coefficient Q, which enters V(r) only through 2Q + 1/B; the library gives the prediction variance at points, not its coefficients, so Q is checked only through V(r) at the cube runsp. 726
- The coefficient R of r^4; the library gives the prediction variance at points, not its coefficients, so R is checked only through V(r) at the cube runsp. 726
- P as a function of n0, its constant (272 - 192·2^(1/2))/40 = 0.0117749; the library evaluates a design with a whole number of centre runs (its prediction variance and variance_dispersion); it has no closed form for V(r) as a function of n0p. 727
- 0.682843 = B/20 and 0.011775, the terms in n0; the library evaluates a design with a whole number of centre runs (its prediction variance and variance_dispersion); it has no closed form for V(r) as a function of n0p. 727
- R as a function of n0, its constant (448 - 2B^2)/640 = 0.1171573; the library evaluates a design with a whole number of centre runs (its prediction variance and variance_dispersion); it has no closed form for V(r) as a function of n0p. 727
- The library has no regular simplex designs, and no check kind measures the distance between runsp. 729
- The library has no full simplex centroid design for five or more components (42 points for a special cubic in six, verified)p. 526
- The U-pseudocomponent transformation (Ui - xi)/(U - 1); the library has L-pseudocomponents only (to_pseudocomponents), no U-pseudocomponentsp. 542
- An algebraic formula, verified numerically while cataloguing; the table is printed in symbols; the library evaluates designs with numbers only, so this is checked in the numeric design of the type (box-draper-18-two-ingredient-orthogonal-blocks, with x3 = 1 - a1 - a2)p. 579
- The blocks are orthogonal to the Scheffé quadratic terms, as Nigam's and John's conditions require; the table is printed in symbols; the library evaluates designs with numbers only, so this is checked in the numeric design of the typep. 579
- An algebraic formula, verified numerically while cataloguing; the library evaluates numeric designs onlyp. 580
- An algebraic formula; at u = v = 1/3 it is Eq. 18.5.5 (verified while cataloguing); the library evaluates numeric designs onlyp. 580
- The table is printed in symbols; the library evaluates designs with numbers only, so this is checked in the numeric design of the type (box-draper-18-type-a-design-a1 and -a2)p. 583