BooksGoos · 2025
OMARS Designs for Factor Screening and Response Surface Experimentation in One Step: A Review
- Matches
Factorial gives the paper's answers.
Examples
Each example, and how closely Factorial gives its answers.
- Table 1: an 8-factor 27-run foldover uniform-precision OMARS design with one center runDesign · pp. 2-3Matches
- Definitive screening designs with one center run, as uniform-precision OMARS designsDesign · p. 2Matches
- Table 2: an 8-factor 32-run non-foldover uniform-precision OMARS designDesign · p. 3Matches
- Table 3: a 4-factor 24-run non-uniform-precision OMARS designDesign · p. 4Matches
- Table 4: a 40-run mixed-level OMARS design with six three-level and four two-level factorsDesign · pp. 5-6Matches
- The two-level design obtained by dropping the six three-level factors of Table 4Design · pp. 5-6Matches
- Run sizes of the 6-factor face-centered central composite and Box-Behnken designs, each with one center run, against strong OMARS designsDesign · p. 6Matches
- Table 5: a 24-run mixed-level OMARS design with four three-level and four two-level factors, and five orthogonal blocking arrangementsDesign · pp. 8-9Matches
- A 7-factor 14-run OMARS design folded over from a circulant weighing matrix of order 7 and weight 4Design · p. 9Matches
Not yet
Answers the paper prints that Factorial cannot compute yet, by what it lacks.
- The library cannot enumerate non-isomorphic OMARS designs (generate_omars searches for one foldover design, and its exhaustive mode counts selections, not isomorphism classes)p. 4