Núñez Ares, Schoen and Goos · 2023

Orthogonal Minimally Aliased Response Surface Designs for Three-Level Quantitative Factors and Two-Level Categorical Factors

Factorial gives most of the paper's answers. Where they differ, this page says why.

Examples

Each example, and how closely Factorial gives its answers.

Answers the paper prints that Factorial cannot compute yet, by what it lacks.

The library has no mixed-level OMARS construction (generate_omars refuses categorical factors) and no check kind reruns the authors' CPLEX search. The row is consistentp. 24
The library has no mixed-level OMARS construction (generate_omars refuses categorical factors) and no check kind reruns the authors' CPLEX search. It equals 245 + 123 + 219, Table 2's Solutionspp. 2 and 23
The library has no mixed-level OMARS construction (generate_omars refuses categorical factors) and no check kind reruns the authors' CPLEX search. It contradicts the 587 designs of the abstract and of Section 5, which is 245 + 123 + 219 from Table 2p. 6
The library has no mixed-level OMARS construction (generate_omars refuses categorical factors) and no check kind reruns the authors' CPLEX search. It equals 1314 + 1173 + 973, Table 2's Instances (the text calls this Table 2's second columnp. 24
The library has no mixed-level OMARS construction (generate_omars refuses categorical factors) and no check kind reruns the authors' CPLEX search. Figure 1a's run axis begins at 16 and shows no 14-run design, so the figure does not show the 14-run sizes the sentence claimsp. 26