Schmidt and Launsby · 2000
Understanding Industrial Designed Experiments
- Matches
- Very close
- Close
- Differs
Factorial gives the book's answers, with a few differences. Where they differ, this page says why: some are misprints in the book, and for some the reason is not known yet.
Examples
Each example, and how closely Factorial gives its answers.
Pages 1 to 99
- Bond strength of two bonding agents, the batch of raw material recorded but not controlledExample · pp. 1-34 to 1-36Very close
- Gas mileage of one vehicle, week by week for twenty weeks: its mean, spread, Cpk and control limitsExample · pp. 1-36 to 1-42Matches
- Gas mileage: tire pressure, timing, oil and gas in a 2^(4-1) fraction, each run driven for three weeksExample · pp. 1-44 to 1-50Misprint found
- A control chart of subgroup averages: nine subgroups of four measurements against a target of 95 ft-lbExample · pp. 1-60Matches
- Nickel plating thickness: bath temperature and plating time in a 2^2 factorial, five products a runExample · pp. 2-2 to 2-23Very close
- Tensile strength against dwell time and cure temperature, a 2 x 3 factorial whose factors do not interactExample · pp. 2-11 to 2-12Matches
- Aircraft paint thickness: thinner, fluid pressure, temperature and vendor in a 2^(4-1) fraction, four readings a runExample · pp. 2-29 to 2-36Close
- Screening eleven factors in a Taguchi L12 design, four readings a runExample · pp. 2-36 to 2-38Misprint found
- Durometer hardness of a butadiene rubber: cure temperature and filler in a 3^2 factorial, three readings a runExample · pp. 2-39 to 2-42Matches
- Dispense volume of a chemical dispensing system: operator and seven sources of variation in a Taguchi L18, four readings a runExample · pp. 2-42 to 2-46Very close
- A two-factor central composite design read four times a row, analysed whole and with one row missingExample · pp. 2-46 to 2-51Matches
- Surface finish of a machined steel rod: RPM, feed rate and tool radius in a 2^3 factorial, four measurements a run (Problem 2 of chapter 2)Exercise · pp. 2-54 to 2-55, answers on J-1, J-2Matches
- Three factors in four runs: the half fraction with C = ABDesign · pp. 2-25 to 2-27Matches
- Four factors in eight runs: the half fraction with D = ABCDesign · pp. 2-27 to 2-28Matches
- Three factors in four runs, balanced and orthogonalDesign · pp. 3-1 to 3-3Matches
- A balanced matrix that is not orthogonal: columns B and C are the sameDesign · pp. 3-3 to 3-4Matches
- A balanced, non-orthogonal matrix without aliased columnsDesign · pp. 3-4 to 3-5Matches
- An orthogonal design for four factors at three levels in nine runsDesign · pp. 3-5 to 3-6Matches
- The 2^3 full factorial in coded unitsDesign · pp. 3-6 to 3-8Matches
- The 3^3 full factorial in coded unitsDesign · pp. 3-8 to 3-9Matches
- Four factors in eight runs: the half fraction D = ABC and its aliasing patternDesign · pp. 3-10 to 3-13Matches
- Seven factors in sixteen runs: the 2^(7-3) with E = ABC, F = BCD and G = ABDDesign · pp. 3-13 to 3-14Matches
- Five factors in eight runs: the 2^(5-2) with D = BC and E = ABCDesign · pp. 3-16Matches
- Six factors in eight runs: the 2^(6-3) with D = AC, E = BC and F = ABCDesign · pp. 3-16Matches
- Five factors in sixteen runs: the 2^(5-1) with E = ABCDDesign · pp. 3-17Matches
- Six factors in sixteen runs: the 2^(6-2) with E = ACD and F = BCDDesign · pp. 3-18Matches
- Eight factors in sixteen runs: the 2^(8-4) with E = ABC, F = ABD, G = ACD and H = BCDDesign · pp. 3-19Matches
- Three factors in four runs, resolution III: C = A × BDesign · pp. 3-20Matches
- The foldover of Table 3.12: four runs reversed, with a blocking column DDesign · pp. 3-20 to 3-21Matches
- The Plackett-Burman 8-run design, built from its generating vectorDesign · pp. 3-21 to 3-24Matches
- The Plackett-Burman 12-run design, built from its generating vectorDesign · pp. 3-22 to 3-24Matches
- A Latin square as a 3^(3-1) designDesign · pp. 3-28 to 3-29Matches
- The Box-Behnken design for three factorsDesign · pp. 3-32Matches
- The Box-Behnken design for four factors, in three orthogonal blocks of nine runsDesign · pp. 3-30 to 3-31Matches
- Box-Behnken designs for three, four and five factors: their run countsDesign · pp. 3-33Matches
- The central composite design for three factors on the full 2^3Design · pp. 3-34 to 3-35Matches
- The central composite design for three factors on the half fraction 2^(3-1)Design · pp. 3-34Matches
- The central composite design for five factors on the 2^(5-1) with E = ABCDDesign · pp. 3-38 to 3-39Matches
- Run counts of five three-level design types for five scenariosDesign · pp. 3-40 to 3-41Matches
- The most frequently used Taguchi designs, and how many factors each screensDesign · pp. 3-42Matches
- The Taguchi L4 orthogonal arrayDesign · pp. 3-43Matches
- The Taguchi L8 orthogonal arrayDesign · pp. 3-43Matches
- The Taguchi L9 orthogonal arrayDesign · pp. 3-44Matches
- The Taguchi L12 orthogonal arrayDesign · pp. 3-45Matches
- The Taguchi L16 orthogonal arrayDesign · pp. 3-46Matches
- The Taguchi L18 orthogonal arrayDesign · pp. 3-47Matches
- The Taguchi L27 orthogonal arrayDesign · pp. 3-48Matches
- Run counts of the designs proposed for two design selection scenariosDesign · pp. 3-49 to 3-52Matches
- Five octane additives in eight runs with D = AC and E = BC (Problem 13 of chapter 3)Design · pp. 3-58 to 3-59, answers on J-2Misprint found
- A 2^(7-2) with F = ABCD and G = BCDE: its defining relationDesign · pp. 3-59, answer on J-2Matches
- A rotatable central composite design on three factors with a full 2^3: axial distance, centre points and run countDesign · pp. 3-60 to 3-61, answer on J-2 and J-3Matches
- A response at two temperatures, four readings each: the one-factor analysis of varianceExample · pp. 4-1 to 4-9Very close
- Strength of a composite material at two autoclave temperatures, nine samples each: F and t testsExample · pp. 4-9 to 4-12Very close
- Temperature and pressure in a 2^2 factorial, two readings a run: the analysis of variance of each effectExample · pp. 4-12 to 4-18Very close
- A 2^3 factorial with three readings a run: the analysis of variance of every effect, and a setting that reaches a targetExample · pp. 4-18 to 4-20Close
- A response at four temperatures, three readings each: simple linear regression, its analysis of variance and prediction intervalsExample · pp. 4-21 to 4-31Differs
- The temperature data with three readings at 50°: a straight line, a line in x², and the quadraticExample · pp. 4-33 to 4-36Differs
- Temperature and pressure, two readings at each of ten settings: multiple regression, lack of fit and multicollinearityExample · pp. 4-36 to 4-43Differs
- A three-factor Box-Behnken design fitted in actual and in coded units: the multicollinearity of the actual unitsExample · pp. 4-43 to 4-48Very close
- A factor at 1, 2 and 3 and its square are 97.9% collinear; coded -1, 0 and +1 they are notExample · pp. 4-45Very close
- One factor at two levels, four readings each: a confidence interval, a t test, an analysis of variance and a regression agreeExample · pp. 4-64 to 4-68Very close
- Critical dimension under two soft bake methods, five setups each (Problem 1 of chapter 4)Exercise · pp. 4-69, answers on J-3, J-4Very close
- Etch rate at five DC bias voltages, seven wafers each (Problem 3 of chapter 4)Exercise · pp. 4-69 to 4-70, answers on J-4Misprint found
- Rate of reaction against the concentration of a plating additive (Problem 4 of chapter 4)Exercise · pp. 4-70 to 4-71, answers on J-5Very close
- Rate constant of cellulose hydrolysis against temperature and sulfuric acid, two readings each (Problem 5 of chapter 4)Exercise · pp. 4-71, answers on J-5Close
- A 2^(5-2) fraction with two readings a run (Problem 6 of chapter 4)Exercise · pp. 4-72Matches
- Seven factors in a Taguchi L8, one reading a run: average effect plots, a Pareto of half effects and a normal probability plotExample · pp. 5-2 to 5-8Matches
- The L8 of Table 5.1 with a second reading a run: analysis of variance, regression, and models of s² and ln sExample · pp. 5-8 to 5-12 and 5-21 to 5-23Very close
- Three factors in four runs with C = A·B: the interaction mistaken for a main effectExample · pp. 5-13 to 5-16Matches
- Five confirmation runs at A- B+ C+ against a prediction of 9Example · pp. 5-15Matches
- Three factors in four runs, two readings each: S/N ratios and ln s compared for finding location and dispersion effectsExample · pp. 5-17 to 5-21Very close
- Shrinkage of cast turbine blades: mold temperature, metal temperature and pour speed in a 2^3, three readings a runExample · pp. 5-24 to 5-28Differs
- Simulated data in a 2^4, one reading a run: dispersion effects found from the residuals' spread at each levelExample · pp. 5-28 to 5-32Very close
- Part shrinkage in injection molding: seven control factors in an L8 inner array, three noise factors in a four-run outer arrayExample · pp. 5-32 to 5-37Not yet explained
- Coating thickness in a 2^2 of time and temperature, four wafers from each of three lots a run: wafer-to-wafer, lot-to-lot and within-wafer variationExample · pp. 5-37 to 5-40Close
- A four-factor face-centred composite design, two readings a run: models for the average and the standard deviationExample · pp. 5-41 to 5-47Not yet explained
- Plating thickness: a 2^(5-1) of time, temperature, nickel, pH and phosphorus, four centre runs, then axial runs in three factors (Case I of 5.10)Example · pp. 5-47 to 5-55Differs
- Plating thickness in a fourteen-run D-optimal design for the full quadratic in time, temperature and nickel (Case II of 5.10)Example · pp. 5-56 to 5-58Very close
- Plating thickness in a Box-Behnken design for time, temperature and nickel (Case II of 5.10)Example · pp. 5-58 to 5-60Very close
- Plating thickness in the 3^3 of time, temperature and nickel (the L27 of Case II of 5.10)Example · pp. 5-60 to 5-64Very close
- A 2^(4-1) with D = ABC, two readings a run (Problem 1 of chapter 5)Exercise · pp. 5-74, answers on J-5Matches
- Turbine blade thickness in a 2^4 of metal and mold temperature, pour time and vendor (Problem 2 of chapter 5)Exercise · pp. 5-74 to 5-75, answers on J-6Matches
- A circuit board etching process: seven factors in an L8 (Problem 3 of chapter 5)Exercise · pp. 5-75 to 5-76, answers on J-6Matches
- Width of an injection molded part: mold temperature, injection velocity, hold pressure and cooling time, B = DAE (Problem 4 of chapter 5)Exercise · pp. 5-77, answers on J-7Matches
- Defects found by four environmental stress screens in a 2^(4-1), three boards a run (Problem 5 of chapter 5)Exercise · pp. 5-77 to 5-78, answers on J-6, J-7Very close
- Solder defects of a wave solder process: five control factors in an L8 inner array, three noise factors in an L4 outer arrayExample · pp. 6-13 to 6-20Very close
- The outer array of the wave solder example: three noise factors in an L4Design · pp. 6-16Matches
- Yield against temperature and pressure, varied one factor at a timeExample · pp. 7-2 to 7-5Matches
- Yield in a 3^2 factorial over a region that does not hold the optimumExample · pp. 7-6Matches
- Yield in a 2^2 factorial with two centre points: a first-order model and its path of steepest ascentExample · pp. 7-9 to 7-11Matches
- Yield in a 2^2 factorial with two centre points, centred on the best run along the path of steepest ascentExample · pp. 7-11 to 7-14Matches
- Yield in a rotatable central composite design: the second-order model, its stationary point and canonical analysisExample · pp. 7-14 to 7-16Not yet explained
- Measurement device repeatability: five gaging factors in an L8 (Kurt Manufacturing)Example · pp. 8-7 to 8-9Matches
- Material remaining on a corroding alloy after zero to three months: a one-way analysis of varianceExample · pp. 8-10 to 8-11Very close
- Force constant of a linear motor: end cap, front cut and centre cut in an L8, analysed by S/N (Digital Equipment)Example · pp. 8-12 to 8-18Very close
- Bottom electrode film stress and resistance: thickness of layer A by the presence of layer C, two readings a run (Ramtron)Example · pp. 8-19 to 8-21Very close
- Bottom electrode film stress after layer B is deposited: a 2^3 full factorial (Ramtron)Example · pp. 8-21 to 8-22Matches
- Shrinkage of an injection molded part: six process settings in an L8, five lengths and five widths a runExample · pp. 8-23 to 8-27Matches
- Simulated integrated computer network: mean packet delay, link utilization and calls blocked against four load and capacity inputsExample · pp. 8-55 to 8-75Differs
- Hang time of paper helicopters: blade ratio, paper and paper clips in a duplicated 2^3Example · pp. 8-81 to 8-86Differs
- Compressive strength of concrete for lunar construction: cement, mixing, wetting agent, plasticizer and five reinforcements in 18 runsExample · pp. 8-87 to 8-100Misprint found
- Compressive strength of three predicted best lunar concrete mixes, confirmed with three specimens eachExample · pp. 8-94 to 8-100Matches
- Silicon doping level of GaAs: arsine, TMGa and silane flows in a duplicated L4Example · pp. 8-102 to 8-109Not yet explained
- Bonding gold wire to GaAs wafers: five bonder settings in an L8, 24 bonds a run scored bond or no bond (Cray Research)Example · pp. 8-110 to 8-113Matches
- Rubber boots for constant velocity joints: seven formulation factors, seven interactions and a test block in an L16 (Quinas)Example · pp. 8-114 to 8-132Very close
- A plasma etch process window: pressure, power and etchant flow in a 20-run central composite design (Honeywell)Example · pp. 8-144 to 8-155Not yet explained
- CPU time of a large program: seven system settings at three levels and one at two, in an 18-run D-optimal design, under three disk file schemesExample · pp. 8-156 to 8-159Not yet explained
- Rivet head protrusion against countersink, the h parameter and head diameter, in four unbalanced blocks (regression on the data collected)Example · pp. 8-168 to 8-180Matches
- BOD removed by a simulated activated sludge system: five parameters in a quarter fractionExample · pp. 8-189 to 8-196Matches
- Moisture titrated from a freeze-dried product: methanol, chloroform, formamide and shake time in a duplicated half fractionExample · pp. 8-204 to 8-207Very close
- Moisture titrated from a freeze-dried product: chloroform by shake time, duplicatedExample · pp. 8-207 to 8-211Misprint found
- Circular runout of a machined lathe part: finish cut, chuck jaws, clamping pressure and feed rate in a 2^4 with three parts a run (Ampex)Example · pp. 8-218 to 8-228Close
- Push-out force of a ball welded over an air bag inflator's fill port: three setup factors in a 12-point D-optimal design (Morton International)Example · pp. 8-229 to 8-234Matches
- Screening an analog filter in SPICE: five components in the first five columns of an L12, ten repetitions a run (Texas Instruments)Example · pp. 8-240 to 8-242Matches
- Modeling an analog filter in SPICE: five components in a 33-run central composite design on a half fraction, four repetitions a runExample · pp. 8-243 to 8-249Misprint found
- A robust active low-pass filter: peaking and resistor value in a 2^2 simulated in PSPICE, with a centre run (Texas Instruments)Example · pp. 8-250 to 8-261Misprint found
- Solder defects on printed wiring assemblies: four board design and two flow solder parameters in an L18, three boards a run (Texas Instruments)Example · pp. 8-262 to 8-271Matches
- Light from a liquid chemiluminescence activator: three reagents and pump type in a 2^4 with a centre run for each pump (Abbott Laboratories)Example · pp. 8-272 to 8-280Very close
- A 2^(8-4) screening design on a photolithography process (critical dimension of CMOS III gates)Design · pp. 8-2 to 8-6Matches
- Sizing a simulation study of a strategic defense architecture: twelve factors at two to four levels (Logicon/RDA)Design · pp. 8-133 to 8-143Matches
- Screening 134 inputs of an AIDS epidemic model with a 136-run Plackett-Burman designDesign · pp. 8-198 to 8-203Matches
- The L18 of the solderability case study, its INT column as the array has it before its level 3 is set to 2Design · pp. 8-265Matches
Misprints
Misprints found in the book, by page. Each shows what the book prints and what its own data give.
Mean of readings: run 5p. 1-47
Book 17.98Data 17.97
The three readings, 17.35, 18.60 and 17.97, average 17.973; the book prints 17.98. Both of run 5's printed values would follow from a first reading of 17.37 (average 17.98, standard deviation 0.615), which suggests a misprint of one digit, but the page prints 17.35
Std dev of readings: run 5p. 1-47
Book .62Data 0.625007
The standard deviation of the three readings is 0.6250; the book prints .62. Both of run 5's printed values would follow from a first reading of 17.37 (average 17.98, standard deviation 0.615), which suggests a misprint of one digit, but the page prints 17.35
Mean of readings: run 1p. 2-37
Book 535.094Data 535.029
The four readings of run 1 average 535.030; the book prints 535.094 and works with it in Table 2.20
Std dev of readings: run 5p. 2-37
Book 88.87Data 89.87
The four readings of run 5 have a standard deviation of 89.87, which Table 2.20 works with; Table 2.19 prints 88.87, a misprint of one digit
Mean of readings: run 1p. 2-44
Book 103.00Data 103.05
The four readings average 103.050; the book prints 103.00. Twelve of Table 2.22's eighteen ȳ differ from the averages of their printed readings, by up to 0.125, while every s agrees with its readings and Table 2.23 averages the readings
Show the rest
Mean of readings: run 3p. 2-44
Book 104.00Data 104.12
The four readings average 104.125; the book prints 104.00. Twelve of Table 2.22's eighteen ȳ differ from the averages of their printed readings, by up to 0.125, while every s agrees with its readings and Table 2.23 averages the readings
Mean of readings: run 4p. 2-44
Book 101.00Data 101.05
The four readings average 101.050; the book prints 101.00. Twelve of Table 2.22's eighteen ȳ differ from the averages of their printed readings, by up to 0.125, while every s agrees with its readings and Table 2.23 averages the readings
Mean of readings: run 5p. 2-44
Book 103.30Data 103.33
The four readings average 103.325; the book prints 103.30. Twelve of Table 2.22's eighteen ȳ differ from the averages of their printed readings, by up to 0.125, while every s agrees with its readings and Table 2.23 averages the readings
Mean of readings: run 8p. 2-44
Book 103.10Data 103.08
The four readings average 103.075; the book prints 103.10. Twelve of Table 2.22's eighteen ȳ differ from the averages of their printed readings, by up to 0.125, while every s agrees with its readings and Table 2.23 averages the readings
Mean of readings: run 9p. 2-44
Book 103.10Data 103.15
The four readings average 103.150; the book prints 103.10. Twelve of Table 2.22's eighteen ȳ differ from the averages of their printed readings, by up to 0.125, while every s agrees with its readings and Table 2.23 averages the readings
Mean of readings: run 11p. 2-44
Book 103.80Data 103.83
The four readings average 103.825; the book prints 103.80. Twelve of Table 2.22's eighteen ȳ differ from the averages of their printed readings, by up to 0.125, while every s agrees with its readings and Table 2.23 averages the readings
Mean of readings: run 13p. 2-44
Book 99.80Data 99.78
The four readings average 99.775; the book prints 99.80. Twelve of Table 2.22's eighteen ȳ differ from the averages of their printed readings, by up to 0.125, while every s agrees with its readings and Table 2.23 averages the readings
Mean of readings: run 15p. 2-44
Book 102.10Data 102.12
The four readings average 102.125; the book prints 102.10. Twelve of Table 2.22's eighteen ȳ differ from the averages of their printed readings, by up to 0.125, while every s agrees with its readings and Table 2.23 averages the readings
Mean of readings: run 16p. 2-44
Book 103.20Data 103.25
The four readings average 103.250; the book prints 103.20. Twelve of Table 2.22's eighteen ȳ differ from the averages of their printed readings, by up to 0.125, while every s agrees with its readings and Table 2.23 averages the readings
Mean of readings: run 17p. 2-44
Book 102.90Data 102.88
The four readings average 102.875; the book prints 102.90. Twelve of Table 2.22's eighteen ȳ differ from the averages of their printed readings, by up to 0.125, while every s agrees with its readings and Table 2.23 averages the readings
Mean of readings: run 18p. 2-44
Book 101.00Data 101.03
The four readings average 101.025; the book prints 101.00. Twelve of Table 2.22's eighteen ȳ differ from the averages of their printed readings, by up to 0.125, while every s agrees with its readings and Table 2.23 averages the readings
Mean: sp. 2-44
Book 0.433Data 0.443
The eighteen standard deviations average 0.443, whether as printed or from the readings; the book prints 0.433
Residual std errorp. 4-41
Book .0436Data 0.435889
Printed .0436; the square root of the residual mean square, .190, is .436, so the printed value has lost a digit
Tolerance: x1²p. 4-42
Book .0006840Data 0.00110192
The book prints .0006840, the next row's tolerance (x1²·x2); x1²'s is .0011019, the same as x1's
Residual std errorp. 4-42
Book .0143Data 0.142853
Printed .0143; the square root of the residual mean square, .020, is .143, so the printed value has lost a digit
Coefficient: Dp. 5-23
Book -0.036Data 0.036
The coefficient of D for ln s is +0.036 (ln s averages .504 at D = -1 and .576 at D = +1); the book prints -0.036
Std dev of readings: run 2p. 5-25
Book 0.225Data 0.255
The three readings have a standard deviation of 0.255, which the averages of s at each level use; the book prints 0.225
Std dev of readings: run 4p. 5-25
Book 1.190Data 0.190
The three readings have a standard deviation of 0.190, which the averages of s at each level use; the book prints 1.190
Ln variance ratio: B·Cp. 5-25
Book -.150Data 0.140538
The averages of s are .1305 at BC = -1 and .140 at +1, a ratio whose logarithm is positive (2 ln(.140/.130) = .148 as the book rounds them); the book prints -.150
Coefficient: Ap. 5-31
Book 2.591Data 2.587
The fitted values and residuals of Table 5.16, and the t values of Table 5.15, follow the data's coefficients, 2.587, 6.602 and 5.946; the printed coefficients do not
Coefficient: Bp. 5-31
Book 6.606Data 6.602
The fitted values and residuals of Table 5.16, and the t values of Table 5.15, follow the data's coefficients, 2.587, 6.602 and 5.946; the printed coefficients do not
Coefficient: A·Bp. 5-31
Book 5.941Data 5.946
The fitted values and residuals of Table 5.16, and the t values of Table 5.15, follow the data's coefficients, 2.587, 6.602 and 5.946; the printed coefficients do not
Coefficient: Ap. 5-30
Book 2.591Data 2.587
The fitted values and residuals of Table 5.16, and the t values of Table 5.15, follow the data's coefficients, 2.587, 6.602 and 5.946; the printed coefficients do not
Coefficient: Bp. 5-30
Book 6.606Data 6.602
The fitted values and residuals of Table 5.16, and the t values of Table 5.15, follow the data's coefficients, 2.587, 6.602 and 5.946; the printed coefficients do not
Coefficient: A·Bp. 5-30
Book 5.941Data 5.946
The fitted values and residuals of Table 5.16, and the t values of Table 5.15, follow the data's coefficients, 2.587, 6.602 and 5.946; the printed coefficients do not
Ss residualp. 5-31
Book 185.032Data 185.082
The residual sum of squares is 185.082, which its mean square 15.423 (185.082/12) follows; the book prints 185.032
Mean of wafer ranges: run 4p. 5-39
Book 3.000Data 3.167
The book's R̄ for run 4 is 3.000, but its twelve printed ranges sum to 38, an average of 3.167; the averages that include run 4 follow the 3.000
Mean: Y: AB (-)p. 5-39
Book 201.9Data 199.8
The book's averages for AB are in swapped rows: 201.9 and 5.833 are the averages at AB = +1, 199.8 and 6.292 at AB = -1; its Δ/2 are right
Mean: Y: AB (+)p. 5-39
Book 199.8Data 201.9
The book's averages for AB are in swapped rows: 201.9 and 5.833 are the averages at AB = +1, 199.8 and 6.292 at AB = -1; its Δ/2 are right
Mean: R: A (+)p. 5-39
Book 5.958Data 6.042
The book's R̄ for run 4 is 3.000, but its twelve printed ranges sum to 38, an average of 3.167; the averages that include run 4 follow the 3.000
Coefficient: R: Ap. 5-39
Book -.104Data -0.0625
The book's R̄ for run 4 is 3.000, but its twelve printed ranges sum to 38, an average of 3.167; the averages that include run 4 follow the 3.000
Mean: R: B (+)p. 5-39
Book 3.333Data 3.417
The book's R̄ for run 4 is 3.000, but its twelve printed ranges sum to 38, an average of 3.167; the averages that include run 4 follow the 3.000
Coefficient: R: Bp. 5-39
Book -2.73Data -2.69
The book's R̄ for run 4 is 3.000, but its twelve printed ranges sum to 38, an average of 3.167; the averages that include run 4 follow the 3.000
Mean: R: AB (-)p. 5-39
Book 5.833Data 6.292
The book's averages for AB are in swapped rows: 201.9 and 5.833 are the averages at AB = +1, 199.8 and 6.292 at AB = -1; its Δ/2 are right
Mean: R: AB (+)p. 5-39
Book 6.292Data 5.917
The book's averages for AB are in swapped rows: 201.9 and 5.833 are the averages at AB = +1, 199.8 and 6.292 at AB = -1; its Δ/2 are right
Coefficient: R: A·Bp. 5-39
Book -.229Data -0.1875
The book's R̄ for run 4 is 3.000, but its twelve printed ranges sum to 38, an average of 3.167; the averages that include run 4 follow the 3.000
Coefficient: R: Interceptp. 5-38
Book 6.062Data 6.104
The book's R̄ for run 4 is 3.000, but its twelve printed ranges sum to 38, an average of 3.167; the averages that include run 4 follow the 3.000
Coefficient: R: Bp. 5-38
Book -2.73Data -2.69
The book's R̄ for run 4 is 3.000, but its twelve printed ranges sum to 38, an average of 3.167; the averages that include run 4 follow the 3.000
Prediction: run 17: time 8, temp 32, nickel 14p. 5-64
Book 323.8Data 326.8
342.0 - 15.2 is 326.8; the book prints 323.8
Coefficient: Interceptp. 5-57
Book 314.786500Data 314.688000
The intercept is 314.6875; the book prints 314.786500, two digits exchanged
P value: TEp. 5-62
Book 0.0016Data 0.0113
The significance column repeats Table 5.38's (0.0016, 0.0802, 0.0656); the t values printed beside them give 0.0113
P value: T²p. 5-62
Book 0.0802Data 0.0000
The significance column repeats Table 5.38's (0.0016, 0.0802, 0.0656); the t values printed beside them give 6e-7
P value: N²p. 5-62
Book 0.0656Data 0.0683
The significance column repeats Table 5.38's (0.0016, 0.0802, 0.0656); the t values printed beside them give 0.068
Mean: F (+)p. 6-18
Book 255Data 254
The sixteen readings average 254.0, which rounds to 254; the book prints 255
Prediction: sn_smaller at S = +1, F = -1p. 6-18
Book 41.57Data -41.57
-45.52 + 1.35 + 2.60 is -41.57; the book drops the minus sign
Mean: R-P (+)p. 8-84
Book 1.477Data 1.471
Runs 1, 2, 7 and 8 average 1.471; with 1.705 at R-P = - the two must sum to twice the grand mean, 3.176, which 1.477 does not
Mean of readings: run 5p. 8-98
Book 2946.91Data 2996.91
The two readings average 2996.91; the book's 2946.91, 50 lower, is the value its averages, prediction and deviation use
Predicted: run 14p. 8-98
Book 4863.01Data 4836.01
The book's equation [8] gives 4836.01, from which the printed deviation of 15.05% follows; the printed 4863.01 has two digits exchanged
Deviation: run 16p. 8-98
Book -33.13Data -32.87
(3857.92 - 5125.97)/3857.92 x 100 is -32.87; the book prints -33.13
Mean: ln s: A (+)p. 8-105
Book 37.731Data 37.737
The printed Ln(S) of runs 3 and 4, 37.593 and 37.881, average 37.737, as printed for C (+); the book prints 37.731
Coefficient: Ap. 8-106
Book 0.63Data 0.69
The coefficient of A is 0.6925, half the effect 1.39; the equation printed beside the vector has 0.69
Mean: x̄: A (low)p. 8-158
Book 337Data 315
Table 1 as printed gives 314.7. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 336.9, which the book may have cut to 337
Mean: x̄: A (mid)p. 8-158
Book 339Data 334
Table 1 as printed gives 333.6. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 339.6, which the book may have cut to 339
Mean: x̄: B (low)p. 8-158
Book 363Data 357
Table 1 as printed gives 357.3. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 363.3
Mean: x̄: B (mid)p. 8-158
Book 265Data 244
Table 1 as printed gives 243.7. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 265.7, which the book may have cut to 265
Mean: x̄: C (low)p. 8-158
Book 333Data 327
Table 1 as printed gives 327.4. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 333.4
Mean: x̄: C (mid)p. 8-158
Book 276Data 254
Table 1 as printed gives 253.6. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 275.6
Mean: x̄: E (mid)p. 8-158
Book 331Data 303
Table 1 as printed gives 303.1. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 331.1
Mean: x̄: F (mid)p. 8-158
Book 290Data 268
Table 1 as printed gives 268.4. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 290.4
Mean: x̄: F (high)p. 8-158
Book 418Data 412
Table 1 as printed gives 411.9. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 417.9
Mean: x̄: G (mid)p. 8-158
Book 288Data 266
Table 1 as printed gives 265.6. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 287.6
Mean: x̄: G (high)p. 8-158
Book 540Data 534
Table 1 as printed gives 534.4. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 540.4
Mean: x̄: H (low)p. 8-158
Book 417Data 399
Table 1 as printed gives 398.9. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 417.5, which the book may have cut to 417
Mean: ln s: A (low)p. 8-158
Book 5.48Data 5.27
Table 1 as printed gives 5.270. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 5.48
Mean: ln s: B (mid)p. 8-158
Book 5.26Data 5.05
Table 1 as printed gives 5.052. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 5.26
Mean: ln s: C (mid)p. 8-158
Book 5.27Data 5.05
Table 1 as printed gives 5.052. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 5.264, which rounds to 5.26
Mean: ln s: E (mid)p. 8-158
Book 5.41Data 5.20
Table 1 as printed gives 5.196. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 5.404, which rounds to 5.40
Mean: ln s: F (mid)p. 8-158
Book 5.31Data 5.10
Table 1 as printed gives 5.103. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 5.315, which rounds to 5.32
Mean: ln s: G (mid)p. 8-158
Book 5.75Data 5.54
Table 1 as printed gives 5.541. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 5.75
Mean: ln s: H (low)p. 8-158
Book 5.56Data 5.43
Table 1 as printed gives 5.426. Most of Tables 2 and 3 follow if run 2's X3 is read as 681 (printed 285) and run 4's X1 as 149 (printed 41), which may be misprints; with those readings it is 5.56
Anova sum sq: Ap. 8-207
Book 0.0025Data 0.0045
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed sum of squares; in Yates order the library's A is 0.00451
Coefficient: Ap. 8-207
Book 0.013Data -0.017
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed half effect; in Yates order the library's A is -0.0168
Anova mean sq: Ap. 8-207
Book 0.0025Data 0.0045
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed mean square; in Yates order the library's A is 0.00451
Anova f: Ap. 8-207
Book 0.608Data 1.083
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed F ratio; in Yates order the library's A is 1.083
Anova sum sq: Bp. 8-207
Book 0.0163Data 0.0021
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed sum of squares; in Yates order the library's B is 0.00214
Coefficient: Bp. 8-207
Book 0.032Data -0.012
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed half effect; in Yates order the library's B is -0.0116
Anova mean sq: Bp. 8-207
Book 0.0163Data 0.0021
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed mean square; in Yates order the library's B is 0.00214
Anova f: Bp. 8-207
Book 3.904Data 0.513
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed F ratio; in Yates order the library's B is 0.513
Anova sum sq: A·Bp. 8-207
Book 0.0188Data 0.0355
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed sum of squares; in Yates order the library's A·B is 0.0355
Coefficient: A·Bp. 8-207
Book 0.034Data 0.047
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed half effect; in Yates order the library's A·B is 0.0471
Anova mean sq: A·Bp. 8-207
Book 0.0188Data 0.0355
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed mean square; in Yates order the library's A·B is 0.0355
Anova f: A·Bp. 8-207
Book 4.513Data 8.519
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed F ratio; in Yates order the library's A·B is 8.519
Anova sum sq: A·Cp. 8-207
Book 0.0002Data 0.0173
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed sum of squares; in Yates order the library's A·C is 0.0173
Coefficient: A·Cp. 8-207
Book 0.004Data 0.033
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed half effect; in Yates order the library's A·C is 0.0329
Anova mean sq: A·Cp. 8-207
Book 0.0002Data 0.0173
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed mean square; in Yates order the library's A·C is 0.0173
Anova f: A·Cp. 8-207
Book 0.048Data 4.159
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed F ratio; in Yates order the library's A·C is 4.159
Anova sum sq: B·Cp. 8-207
Book 0.0051Data 0.0001
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed sum of squares; in Yates order the library's B·C is 0.000101
Coefficient: B·Cp. 8-207
Book -0.018Data -0.003
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed half effect; in Yates order the library's B·C is -0.00251
Anova mean sq: B·Cp. 8-207
Book 0.0051Data 0.0001
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed mean square; in Yates order the library's B·C is 0.000101
Anova f: B·Cp. 8-207
Book 1.219Data 0.024
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed F ratio; in Yates order the library's B·C is 0.0241
Anova sum sq: A·B·Cp. 8-207
Book 0.0355Data 0.0188
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed sum of squares; in Yates order the library's A·B·C is 0.0188
Coefficient: A·B·Cp. 8-207
Book -0.047Data -0.034
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed half effect; in Yates order the library's A·B·C is -0.0343
Anova mean sq: A·B·Cp. 8-207
Book 0.0355Data 0.0188
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed mean square; in Yates order the library's A·B·C is 0.0188
Anova f: A·B·Cp. 8-207
Book 8.518Data 4.514
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (ab, a, b, (1), bc, abc, c, ac) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed F ratio; in Yates order the library's A·B·C is 4.514
Anova sum sq: Ap. 8-209
Book 0.0126Data 0.0000
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (b, (1), a, ab) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed sum of squares; in Yates order the library's A is 0.0000028
Coefficient: Ap. 8-209
Book 0.040Data -0.001
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (b, (1), a, ab) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed half effect; in Yates order the library's A is -0.00059
Anova mean sq: Ap. 8-209
Book 0.0126Data 0.0000
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (b, (1), a, ab) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed mean square; in Yates order the library's A is 0.0000028
Anova f: Ap. 8-209
Book 12.651Data 0.003
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (b, (1), a, ab) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed F ratio; in Yates order the library's A is 0.0028
Anova sum sq: Bp. 8-209
Book 0.0000Data 0.0064
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (b, (1), a, ab) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed sum of squares; in Yates order the library's B is 0.00639
Coefficient: Bp. 8-209
Book -0.001Data -0.028
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (b, (1), a, ab) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed half effect; in Yates order the library's B is -0.0283
Anova mean sq: Bp. 8-209
Book 0.0000Data 0.0064
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (b, (1), a, ab) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed mean square; in Yates order the library's B is 0.00639
Anova f: Bp. 8-209
Book 0.003Data 6.438
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (b, (1), a, ab) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed F ratio; in Yates order the library's B is 6.438
Anova sum sq: A·Bp. 8-209
Book 0.0064Data 0.0126
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (b, (1), a, ab) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed sum of squares; in Yates order the library's A·B is 0.0126
Coefficient: A·Bp. 8-209
Book -0.028Data 0.040
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (b, (1), a, ab) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed half effect; in Yates order the library's A·B is 0.0396
Anova mean sq: A·Bp. 8-209
Book 0.0064Data 0.0126
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (b, (1), a, ab) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed mean square; in Yates order the library's A·B is 0.0126
Anova f: A·Bp. 8-209
Book 6.440Data 12.648
The book runs Yates's algorithm on the run totals in run-number order (b, (1), a, ab) as though they were in Yates order, which gives the printed F ratio; in Yates order the library's A·B is 12.648
P value: C·Dp. 8-224
Book .0377Data 0.376794
The two-sided p-value is 0.377; the table prints .0377, a misplaced decimal point
Coefficient: over: L1²p. 8-246
Book -0.189Data 0.189
The coefficient is +0.1887; the printed model has lost its sign
Coefficient: over_s: R1·C2p. 8-246
Book 0.008Data -0.008
The coefficient is -0.0084; the printed model has lost its sign
Prediction: YB at the centrep. 8-256
Book -18.9Data -21.4
The four corner runs average -21.375; -18.9 would follow if the third corner's -27.5 were -17.5, which may be a misprint
Anova sum sq: Ap. 8-274
Book 210578Data 6
Table 1 gives 6.25. Table 2 does not follow from the printed runs, with the centre runs' pump type at -1 and +1 or at 0: its sums of squares for A and A·D are far from 16 times the squares of Table 3's coefficients, 6.25 and 132.25
Anova mean sq: Ap. 8-274
Book 2.11E+05Data 6.25
Table 1 gives 6.25. Table 2 does not follow from the printed runs, with the centre runs' pump type at -1 and +1 or at 0: its sums of squares for A and A·D are far from 16 times the squares of Table 3's coefficients, 6.25 and 132.25
Anova f: Ap. 8-274
Book 0.04Data 0.00
Table 1 gives F = 1.2E-06 and p = 0.9992, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova p: Ap. 8-274
Book 0.8532Data 0.9992
Table 1 gives F = 1.2E-06 and p = 0.9992, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova f: Bp. 8-274
Book 24083Data 24
Table 1 gives F = 24.03 and p = 0.0163; the printed 24083 has also lost its decimal point, as Table 2's own 24.83 would read
Anova p: Bp. 8-274
Book 0.0155Data 0.0163
Table 1 gives F = 24.03 and p = 0.0163, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova f: Cp. 8-274
Book 17.51Data 16.94
Table 1 gives F = 16.94 and p = 0.0260, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova p: Cp. 8-274
Book 0.0249Data 0.0260
Table 1 gives F = 16.94 and p = 0.0260, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova sum sq: Dp. 8-274
Book 41652843Data 41180800
Table 1 gives 4.118E+07. Table 2 does not follow from the printed runs, with the centre runs' pump type at -1 and +1 or at 0: its sums of squares for A and A·D are far from 16 times the squares of Table 3's coefficients, 6.25 and 132.25
Anova mean sq: Dp. 8-274
Book 4.17E+07Data 4.11808e+07
Table 1 gives 4.118E+07. Table 2 does not follow from the printed runs, with the centre runs' pump type at -1 and +1 or at 0: its sums of squares for A and A·D are far from 16 times the squares of Table 3's coefficients, 6.25 and 132.25
Anova f: Dp. 8-274
Book 8.25Data 7.90
Table 1 gives F = 7.898 and p = 0.0673, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova p: Dp. 8-274
Book 0.0639Data 0.0673
Table 1 gives F = 7.898 and p = 0.0673, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova sum sq: A·Bp. 8-274
Book 135831506Data 136832000
Table 1 gives 1.368E+08. Table 2 does not follow from the printed runs, with the centre runs' pump type at -1 and +1 or at 0: its sums of squares for A and A·D are far from 16 times the squares of Table 3's coefficients, 6.25 and 132.25
Anova f: A·Bp. 8-274
Book 27.12Data 26.24
Table 1 gives F = 26.24 and p = 0.0144, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova p: A·Bp. 8-274
Book 0.0138Data 0.0144
Table 1 gives F = 26.24 and p = 0.0144, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova f: A·Cp. 8-274
Book 2.00Data 1.94
Table 1 gives F = 1.936 and p = 0.2584, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova p: A·Cp. 8-274
Book 0.2522Data 0.2584
Table 1 gives F = 1.936 and p = 0.2584, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova sum sq: A·Dp. 8-274
Book 201694Data 132
Table 1 gives 132.25. Table 2 does not follow from the printed runs, with the centre runs' pump type at -1 and +1 or at 0: its sums of squares for A and A·D are far from 16 times the squares of Table 3's coefficients, 6.25 and 132.25
Anova mean sq: A·Dp. 8-274
Book 2.02E+05Data 132.25
Table 1 gives 132.25. Table 2 does not follow from the printed runs, with the centre runs' pump type at -1 and +1 or at 0: its sums of squares for A and A·D are far from 16 times the squares of Table 3's coefficients, 6.25 and 132.25
Anova f: A·Dp. 8-274
Book 0.04Data 0.00
Table 1 gives F = 2.5E-05 and p = 0.9963, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova p: A·Dp. 8-274
Book 0.8563Data 0.9963
Table 1 gives F = 2.5E-05 and p = 0.9963, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova f: B·Cp. 8-274
Book 2.19Data 2.12
Table 1 gives F = 2.115 and p = 0.2418, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova p: B·Cp. 8-274
Book 0.2358Data 0.2418
Table 1 gives F = 2.115 and p = 0.2418, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova f: B·Dp. 8-274
Book 23.86Data 23.09
Table 1 gives F = 23.09 and p = 0.0172, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova p: B·Dp. 8-274
Book 0.0164Data 0.0172
Table 1 gives F = 23.09 and p = 0.0172, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova f: C·Dp. 8-274
Book 1.49Data 1.44
Table 1 gives F = 1.440 and p = 0.3163, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova p: C·Dp. 8-274
Book 0.3097Data 0.3163
Table 1 gives F = 1.440 and p = 0.3163, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova sum sq: A·B·Cp. 8-274
Book 10126124Data 10125100
Table 1 gives 1.01251E+07. Table 2 does not follow from the printed runs, with the centre runs' pump type at -1 and +1 or at 0: its sums of squares for A and A·D are far from 16 times the squares of Table 3's coefficients, 6.25 and 132.25
Anova f: A·B·Cp. 8-274
Book 2.01Data 1.94
Table 1 gives F = 1.942 and p = 0.2578, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova p: A·B·Cp. 8-274
Book 0.2516Data 0.2578
Table 1 gives F = 1.942 and p = 0.2578, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova f: A·B·Dp. 8-274
Book 30.22Data 29.25
Table 1 gives F = 29.25 and p = 0.0124, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova p: A·B·Dp. 8-274
Book 0.0118Data 0.0124
Table 1 gives F = 29.25 and p = 0.0124, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova f: A·C·Dp. 8-274
Book 2.67Data 2.58
Table 1 gives F = 2.583 and p = 0.2064, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova p: A·C·Dp. 8-274
Book 0.2008Data 0.2064
Table 1 gives F = 2.583 and p = 0.2064, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova f: B·C·Dp. 8-274
Book 1.78Data 1.73
Table 1 gives F = 1.726 and p = 0.2804, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Anova p: B·C·Dp. 8-274
Book 0.2740Data 0.2803
Table 1 gives F = 1.726 and p = 0.2804, against an error mean square of 5.214E+06 on 3 degrees of freedom; Table 2's error mean square is 5.05E+06
Ss residualp. 8-274
Book 15138512Data 15642200
Table 1 gives 15642200 for the error, the fourteen terms fitted to the 18 runs. Table 2 does not follow from the printed runs, with the centre runs' pump type at -1 and +1 or at 0: its sums of squares for A and A·D are far from 16 times the squares of Table 3's coefficients, 6.25 and 132.25
Ms residualp. 8-274
Book 5.05E+06Data 5.21408e+06
Table 1 gives 5.214E+06 for the error mean square. Table 2 does not follow from the printed runs, with the centre runs' pump type at -1 and +1 or at 0: its sums of squares for A and A·D are far from 16 times the squares of Table 3's coefficients, 6.25 and 132.25
R squaredp. 8-274
Book .9796Data 0.978902
Table 1 gives R² = 0.9789. Table 2 does not follow from the printed runs, with the centre runs' pump type at -1 and +1 or at 0: its sums of squares for A and A·D are far from 16 times the squares of Table 3's coefficients, 6.25 and 132.25
R squared adjp. 8-274
Book .8843Data 0.880446
Table 1 gives adjusted R² = 0.8804. Table 2 does not follow from the printed runs, with the centre runs' pump type at -1 and +1 or at 0: its sums of squares for A and A·D are far from 16 times the squares of Table 3's coefficients, 6.25 and 132.25
Coefficient: s: A·Dp. 8-278
Book -11.220Data -5.344
The coefficient of A·D is -5.344 and that of B·C -11.219: Table 4 prints them exchanged
Coefficient: s: B·Cp. 8-278
Book -5.340Data -11.219
The coefficient of A·D is -5.344 and that of B·C -11.219: Table 4 prints them exchanged
Coefficient: s: A·B·Cp. 8-278
Book 89.660Data 89.694
The coefficient is 89.694, which Table 4 prints, cut, as B·C·D's 89.690; its ABC row has 89.660
Coefficient: s: B·C·Dp. 8-278
Book 89.690Data -50.156
The coefficient is -50.156; Table 4's 89.690 is A·B·C's coefficient, 89.694, cut
Anova mean sq: biasp. J-4
Book 17843Data 17652
The 35 readings, checked against the page, give a mean square of 17651.8 (70607 on 4 degrees of freedom) and F = 348.6; the answer's 17843 does not follow from them
Anova f: biasp. J-4
Book 352.3Data 348.6
The 35 readings, checked against the page, give a mean square of 17651.8 (70607 on 4 degrees of freedom) and F = 348.6; the answer's 352.3 is 17843/50.64
Resolutionp. J-2
Book IVData 3
ACD and BCE, words of three letters, are in the defining relation, so the design is of resolution III, as the problem's own aliases of the main effects with two-factor interactions show
Aliases: Ap. J-2
Book CD = ABDE = BDEData ABCE, BDE, CD
A's aliases are CD, ABCE and BDE; the answer prints ABDE, a word of the defining relation, for ABCE
Not yet
Answers the book prints that Factorial cannot compute yet, by what it lacks.
- A three-level fraction that also estimates the named interactions; the library makes three-level fractions only as Taguchi arrays chosen for the main effectsp. 3
- The book's own rule for the number of centre runs, 4√(n_F + 1) - 2k rounded up (6.49 here); no library function computes itp. 3
- The book's own rule for the centre runs of a composite design; no library function computes itp. 3
- The book's own rule for centre runs, 4√(n_F + 1) - 2k; no library function computes itp. 3
- The book's own rule for centre runs, rounded up from 8.49; no library function computes itp. 3
Show the rest
- The answer's rule for an orthogonal design, 4√8 + 1 - 6 = 6.3, which the library does not use